|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:26 AM Original message |
Final OH results (certified) coming in NOW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jo March
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
1. 56% of precincts reporting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrUnderhill
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
2. I think we know all but a couple counties now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:35 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Some of Vote Suppressions' numbers look odd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:38 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I'll have the final tally within the hour n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeeBGBz
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
4. Quite a Bush margin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:38 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. The numbers will close dramatically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:01 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Cuyahoga came in. Kerry netted 9242 there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:05 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I've seen that but the numbers don't add up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:17 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. I think it does include absentees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
7. Up to 60.49% (69/88 counties) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
8. Why so few votes from Franklin county? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. There's over a half million votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:15 AM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Because I thought the population of Franklin Cty. was something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:20 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Franklin has 845,720 registered voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
10. * +57,203 K+74,078 84 out of 88 counties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmknapp
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
11. Say what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:03 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. No, it's not -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:07 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. but CNN reported about an hour ago that the certification was done and tha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:08 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Yes the certification is done... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrydemocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:20 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. I'm not believing these numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
21. 79 of 88 counties in (71.47% of precincts) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atim
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
22. Does the counting involves checking software integrity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 12:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
33. All kinds of things are possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
23. There is a thread running that has the Final Tally n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:25 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Yes, but it is interesting to see the number breakdown. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RawMaterials
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
25. this makes me sick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:39 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Yes, it is updated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrydemocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:50 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. I dont believe the Warren County numbers at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:54 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Do you know what type of voting equipment was used there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrydemocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:58 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. I'm not sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 12:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Actually I found it-- Warren used punchcard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrydemocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 12:13 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. OK Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 12:42 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. Boy I hope so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
53. In 2000, Warren was Bush 47,235, Gore 18,749 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wordie
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
32. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrydemocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 12:21 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Does anyone know if these are heavy dem precints |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 12:24 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Four are Republican, 1 is Democrat... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepthemhonest
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
34. another thread says it should only be a differance of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 12:22 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. That number looks right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrydemocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 12:24 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. I hope it gets closer than that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
40. 74.000 is all that is left of the lead!!! with 90% reporting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 12:57 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. We're at 98% now, Bush's lead is up to 97,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepthemhonest
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
42. oh my god it is only a difference of 96,000 right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:03 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Yes, but the last 3 counties are all solid Republican n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrydemocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:14 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. I have been up all night with no sleep so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemis12
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:16 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. It's 96,000 but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrydemocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:20 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. LOL Ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemis12
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:21 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. I'd be angry too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrydemocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:28 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. I'm fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtb33
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
48. 98.11% reporting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabra
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:25 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Which counties are left? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemis12
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:26 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. They are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:30 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. 98.83% in now. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrydemocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:40 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. why did they erase athens numbers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
O.M.B.inOhio
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:47 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. did you see what the Athens numbers were before? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepthemhonest
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:49 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. does anyone know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrydemocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:53 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. I don't know what the numbers were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 02:02 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Most of Ohio voted on punch cards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabra
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:49 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. The site's been hacked! :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrydemocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:51 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 01:58 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Here are the Nov. 15 results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mostly_lurking
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 02:37 PM Response to Reply #54 |
63. Athens apparently was entered in error |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
m.standridge
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
62. OH certified results; thanks for link; plurality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC