|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
HR_Pufnstuf
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 05:37 PM Original message |
Bev Harris has not trademarked "clean up crew" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. I Think We All Have More Important Matters To Tend To Right Now, Thank You |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HR_Pufnstuf
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 05:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. You are so so welcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Much more important things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neversaynever
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 09:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
34. but seriously folks, is Bev-Bashing really a priority here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bloom
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. Be careful. Her supporters are very touchy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HR_Pufnstuf
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 05:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. lol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 05:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. next time have the conviction to debate your own thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 08:32 PM Response to Reply #7 |
31. That thread wasn't up for debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 09:33 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. So you get to bash away and if anyone disagrees, they're touchy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 10:55 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. I did not bash Bev Harris. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 11:32 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Look at your own post #4. Hey, you're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 11:35 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Okay, just wanted to prove I didn't bash Bev. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 11:42 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. nice, tidy, and smooth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 11:45 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Actually, factually, veirfiably, I DIDN'T say you did - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
6. I would say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 05:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Only Thing Is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HR_Pufnstuf
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 05:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Oh I see. sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IAMREALITY
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 05:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HR_Pufnstuf
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 05:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Better yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 05:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Better run that by Andy first... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. AND, I have to add this- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 08:43 PM Response to Reply #15 |
32. I work for an airline. The team that cleans the planes is called... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HR_Pufnstuf
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:08 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. I said maybe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:15 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Deleted message |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:00 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. That was cute. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Well, I missed the other threads on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ParanoidPat
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
18. She doesn't have to....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HR_Pufnstuf
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:13 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. ewww.. i better hurry then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:56 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. Is she selling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HR_Pufnstuf
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 07:10 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Raggedy Andy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ParanoidPat
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-04 01:35 AM Response to Reply #26 |
46. Mike, keep one thing in mind....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamboi
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
19. Doesn't work that way. She's been using it for an extended time and that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HR_Pufnstuf
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 07:33 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. But, what if someone else already has trademarked it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
21. Deleted message |
HR_Pufnstuf
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:16 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. (growing up) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:17 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Deleted message |
HR_Pufnstuf
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 06:18 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Yeah, that too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 07:20 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 07:27 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Deleted message |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 08:50 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. And I like your sense of humor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio_liberal
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 09:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Pothead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
35. Yay, more Bev bashing. How original and substantive. Not to mention - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free
![]() |
Wed Dec-08-04 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
38. BWAAAH! Just as I thought! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-04 01:10 AM Response to Reply #38 |
44. So it's registered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-04 01:17 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. How embarassing for you, Symbolman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC