|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
momzno1
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:14 PM Original message |
here is bev's email to bbv forum with IP address |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale_Rider
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. Ah ... the IP address is ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamboi
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Anything more we can tell from it? thanks for starting this constructive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbond56
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:23 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. narrows it down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReneB
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:24 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. well it says that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 11:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
34. Amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale_Rider
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 04:05 AM Response to Reply #3 |
51. Need the original email ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 11:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
82. Nothing else to tell from it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmatthan
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Yes, this is not a public IP address. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libertypirate
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 12:55 AM Response to Reply #4 |
39. That address won't route on the Internet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lauri
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. And if Bev doesn't know that it is a standard internal IP address |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. She herself has noted that she knows next to nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fescue4u
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 11:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
32. Her "army" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrustingDog
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 02:03 AM Response to Reply #12 |
48. and e voting fraud is what the repugs say... just a tinhatter thot... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
absolutezero
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 02:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
58. Welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. 192.168.2.4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamboi
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Though if it is happening at a time that is suspicious that would scream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
momzno1
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. there is a conversation about this on bbv at the bottom of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
momzno1
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. there is a conversation about this on bbv at the bottom of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
19. Yeah... but why is it Dialing Out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blue agave
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
6. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roger_Otip
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
11. suggests computers linked to one another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lauri
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. According to Microsoft's TechNet: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brundle_Fly
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
13. this is an internal IP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Shrub
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
14. private ip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
15. FYI that address is not internet routable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Shrub
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. some digiboards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue in the face
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. "I hope this clears up some of the confusion." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:46 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Reported log is like normal operation of a disconnected computer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Calvinist Basset
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:51 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Shrub
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
17. no offense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmallFatCat
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
22. MAC Address |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbond56
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 11:19 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. NACK=non acknowledge? n/t=no thread, jq=just a question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbond56
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 11:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 11:56 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Merci, nrsvp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 01:42 AM Response to Reply #25 |
44. Not Welltech, Soyo (a mainboard manufacturer) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinfoil_beret
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
24. DHCP Server |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DubyaSux
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 11:57 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. Digiboards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinfoil_beret
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
27. A possible explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mulethree
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
29. DHCP server issued a NACK to the client |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamboi
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
30. So could someone summarize and simplify? Thanks n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fescue4u
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
31. SO its nothing then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamboi
![]() |
Tue Dec-14-04 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
33. Does this add anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KTM
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
38. I think this is junk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
passy
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 02:51 PM Response to Reply #38 |
59. What does this do ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KTM
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 09:48 PM Response to Reply #59 |
76. Sure - but not a likely thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill Bored
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 10:43 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Your are correct KTM! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkusQ
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
40. This seems to CONFIRM that they weren't networked at the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 01:28 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. You can't draw either conclusion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkusQ
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 11:06 AM Response to Reply #42 |
54. Or maybe an elephant sat on it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merwin
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 01:38 AM Response to Reply #40 |
43. It was getting declined, which means it was networked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 01:45 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. No, I think the DHCP server was running on the voting machine n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 04:20 AM Response to Reply #43 |
53. Knowing Windows, there could have been NO DHCP server at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KTM
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 02:03 AM Response to Reply #40 |
47. I dont think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 01:25 AM Response to Original message |
41. OK, here's what to look at. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KTM
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 02:01 AM Response to Reply #41 |
46. So, using that example and working backwards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumpel
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
49. I am on a Mac I have an IP Network with the same address |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pobeka
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 03:16 AM Response to Original message |
50. GEMS cannot be unnetworked and get a DHCP server response... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonyguy
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 05:29 PM Response to Reply #50 |
61. DHCP on GEMS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Mouse
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 04:15 AM Response to Original message |
52. summarize for a non-techie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
F.Gordon
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
55. Some followup questions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 05:10 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. Followup answers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
F.Gordon
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 09:00 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 02:12 AM Response to Reply #62 |
68. IP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
F.Gordon
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 12:47 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. You're playing "guess the fraud" as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
F.Gordon
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 01:52 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Actually, it would require less "hacking"..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 08:51 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. None of that really helps... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
F.Gordon
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 10:21 PM Response to Reply #72 |
77. Still doesn't convince me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Fri Dec-17-04 06:05 AM Response to Reply #77 |
83. Well first... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smartvoter
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
56. That's an internal IP address. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
F.Gordon
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 02:46 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. I know. Can you answer my questions above? n/t thanks!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
63. From a very well-informed source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BansheeDem
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
64. Bev is telling stories; I think ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:12 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. How can the machine be stand-alone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BansheeDem
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:35 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. Well ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 11:19 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Therefore, if it WAS attempting to connect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BansheeDem
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 01:43 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Yes, but it was trying to connect within the LAN ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace
![]() |
Fri Dec-17-04 08:22 AM Response to Reply #66 |
86. You are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace
![]() |
Fri Dec-17-04 08:21 AM Response to Reply #65 |
85. It was networked at one time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 09:33 PM Response to Reply #64 |
75. You did not miss any thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 10:33 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill Bored
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 11:06 PM Response to Reply #64 |
80. It's a private IP address |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace
![]() |
Fri Dec-17-04 08:17 AM Response to Reply #80 |
84. They are way out of their depth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
evolvenow
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
73. Could someone have called in wireless?Blackberry, Palm Pilot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill Bored
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 11:09 PM Response to Reply #73 |
81. Doesn't have to be wireless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
evolvenow
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
74. Just guessing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC