|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
grumpy old fart
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 09:52 AM Original message |
Nader Challenges M. Moore to Walk the Walk........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
1. this from the man who said there was no diff between Gore and Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pocoloco
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:25 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Where are Ralph's observations not right on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 01:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. The Iraq war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 02:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
27. Nader's got guts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grumpy old fart
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:27 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Dems and Repugs both in corporate pockets.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grumpy old fart
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. By the way, God bless Conyers....a man with balls and a backbone. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seaveggie
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:33 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Right on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:52 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Amen. Ralph gave bush a leg up into the WH four years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regularjoe
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 01:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. With instant runoff voting it wouldn't be possible to be a "spoiler." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seaveggie
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
5. This is really important stuff for all progressives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gingergreen
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:36 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Here here!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seaveggie
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:38 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Interersting site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesla
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:59 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Thanks for the link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bear425
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 02:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
28. Ginger, I just joined and signed the petition. Thanks! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Griffy
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 01:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. Ralph is right.. BUT, he attacks the front gate! being right isnt enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kralizec
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
9. Nader has been trying to light a fire up progressives' asses for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grumpy old fart
![]() |
Wed Dec-15-04 10:55 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Amen brother....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
13. Just when I was starting to like Nader again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
15. So, Ralphie, about those New Hampshire recounts.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regularjoe
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 02:05 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. He was asked and advised to start with New Hampshire by activists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 02:18 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. So, it was the mistake of several people - just as I said at the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regularjoe
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 02:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Nader did deliver, but no fraud was found.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 03:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. i must have missed all the recounts kerry demanded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
16. a timely message for all the conceders and enablers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 02:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. From a W enabler? And his point is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 02:46 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. there are a quite few W enablers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
17. Who takes Nader seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
info being
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
23. Well-said Ralph! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quakerfriend
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 02:38 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alizaryn
![]() |
Thu Dec-16-04 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
30. ouch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC