|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
nickshepDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 11:47 AM Original message |
The Maryland State Board of Elections RESPONSE to my letter. READ THIS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bronco69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
1. *sigh* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickshepDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 11:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I hear ya on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. What they describe as "tests" means nothing unless you have.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. How can they know it's accurate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suziedemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 01:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. As a software programmer -"testing" doesn't impress me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Correct. And .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Al-CIAda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 01:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
27. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
2. Just one sentence is all that is required to classify this as BULLSHIT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickshepDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I retyped this because I dont have a scanner it COULD have typos. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Not to worry .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickshepDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Do you think I chaged the letter or something? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Not at all.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickshepDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:14 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Then why would you point out the typos like they are a big deal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Mandate Here. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. n/t means No text. (just what's in the title bar...) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickshepDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Oh ok... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyPriest (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
7. There are MANY ways those machines could be hacked that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 01:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
26. Yeah, .."reduce he likelyhood.." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. Voting machines and their software should only be purchased from OOC, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idealista (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. what about government-owned vote software? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 01:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. I posted this before... and I will post it again... Windows is broken when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suziedemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 01:27 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Absolutely - Most systems I've worked on the client owned the software |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
9. The Baltimore Sun ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickshepDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
16. I am NOTTT disagreeing with you guys about the possibility of fraud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. We're just indicating to you that their 'confidence' is either ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyPriest (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 12:41 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Nick: it's quite possible they FEEL confident in their machines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 01:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I am linking to a previous post so that EVERYBODY on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 02:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. Wonder how many Diebold, ES&S, Triad, Sequoia..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 02:03 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. Actually it is Election Fraud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smirking_Chimp (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
24. "the voting system is accurate and secure" Where's proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickshepDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
28. Thanx guys/gals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WritersBlock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-25-04 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
30. Another telling phrase: "was approved by the prior administration." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jun 24th 2024, 02:31 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC