|
Why would the Bush administration extol the election Exit Polls in the Ukraine, which showed that the candidate that they supported had won the Ukraine election, while dismissing the Exit Polls in the United States, which showed that John Kerry won the 2004 election here?
Why don't you do news investigations of: 1) The differences between the Ukraine and the U.S. Exit Polls and why the U.S. Exit Polls are bunk (or not); 2) What ulterior motives the Bush administration might have in favoring one candidate over another in the Ukraine (oil, gas, cheap labor, only big powerful rich men benefiting from resources?), and how much of our money the Bush administration infused into the Ukrainian election to get the result they wanted; 3) Do the people of the Ukraine have their own independent reasons for supporting the Bush-preferred candidate (or was it wholly CIA psyops that spurred the Ukrainians to resist a fraudulent election)?; 4) What do you think the reaction would have been in the U.S. on Nov. 2-3 if American voters had known that John Kerry won in the Exit Polls and George Bush won in the "official results"--information that was denied them by the TV networks mixing the "official results" into the Exit Poll results late in the day on Nov. 2, so that it appeared that George Bush had won both? Would American voters have cared?; 5) Why the Ukrainians had pure Exit Poll data to compare with the "official results," and Americans did not; 6) Why would the Bush donors who head all of the electronic voting machine companies on which Americans voted in 2004 not want a paper trail for election recounts, audits and verification, and why did the Republicans in Congress prevent a paper trail provision from ever coming to a vote in the House? 7) Why wouldn't Bush donors who head the electronic voting machine companies and their Republican allies in Congress want to prove the efficacy of their electronic voting machines, and the honesty of the election, by providing a paper trail?; 8) If companies whose CEOs are Bush donors hold the computer programming source code that runs the central vote tabulators as secret, proprietary information, how can American voters be sure that the source code was not pre-programmed or hacked to produce a Bush victory?; 9) What are the differences or similarities between the U.S., Ukraine and Venezuelan election systems, as to, a) a paper receipt for every vote, and b) open (publicly reviewable) source code running the electronic vote tabulators?; 10) What is the content of the letters that Congressman John Conyers recently sent to the Triad voting machine company and the Secretary of State in Ohio, with cc's to the FBI and the Ohio Attorney General, and why would this be important to Americans who voted in 2004?
Oh, and, yeah, how's Michael Jackson lately? Isn't his trial coming up soon?
Yours sincerely, Peace Patriot
________________
Admittedly, this letter has complicated questions, and is ambiguous in its points about the Ukraine election (though not about the Bush election)--but isn't that what journalism is for, to help the public find out what's happening and help us sort out complex questions of foreign and national policy?
I guess not. But we can still ask them to.
|