|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
righteous1
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:06 PM Original message |
Ohio Recount Over 88/88 , JK picks up 300 Votes "Officially" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roenyc
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. please tell me this means little to us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldeneye
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I think we have pretty much disqaulified the recount. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Well $115000 down the drain, some of that mine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldeneye
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:17 PM Original message |
It was a good starting point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Firespirit
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Not a total waste |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yellow Horse
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 04:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. People, People! The recount has done its job! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 04:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
22. Not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 05:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
36. In the scheme of things, that was money WELL SPENT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Court decisions are the next big event |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chimpanzee
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
5. It's OK, Mr Blackwell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bones_7672
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 05:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
28. I bet he becomes Governor in '06. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Helga Scow Stern
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 05:25 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. That would be a definite, given the current voting mechanism! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ivorysteve
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. Not a word about the recount "irregularities". Incredible. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. at the end |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Griffy
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. says right in article.. this aint over... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mordarlar
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. near 300 votes in 3%... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quakerfriend
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Exactly Mordarlar! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mordarlar
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Lets not give up the war before the battle has even started |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. If you prorated that 300 votes @3% would amount to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pab Sungenis
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
10. Don't the rules say.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fly by night
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
16. Was there even one OH county that recounted according to the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bufftiger
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
17. Please write to AP reporter and ask about his incomplete reporting.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nicho
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 04:14 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. all the ballots were recounted by machine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodonkey
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 04:23 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Which means absolutely NOTHING, if there was machine fraud. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nicho
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 04:32 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. if that is the case, then why do the recount at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodonkey
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 04:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Why recount? For 1 thing, to start documenting some of these problems! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nicho
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 04:59 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. it seems then that the recount validated the efficiency of the machines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bufftiger
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 05:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. No, some machine counts of the 3% did not match the official count |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nicho
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 05:09 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I believe the 3% handcount is compared with the 3% machine REcount |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doremus
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 05:18 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Fellow Buckeye here. You don't find election fraud "credible"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 05:21 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I don't really think they did that to skew the results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nicho
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 05:26 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. your right, I'm new and haven't followed the fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yellow Horse
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 06:16 PM Response to Reply #26 |
38. There are all kinds of problems with the OH machines.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bufftiger
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 04:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Some counties 3% recount didn't match the official count, yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 04:48 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. All they proved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blissfulbride
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
34. Check the Green's recount site -- it's not official yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blissfulbride
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
35. AP has UNofficial count totals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Tue Dec-28-04 06:15 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. "official" = (sarc) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC