|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 08:33 AM Original message |
Why A Senator (or two) Refusing To Certify Is Pointless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 08:35 AM Response to Original message |
1. Could not have said it better myself n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berniew1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
116. If they choose to investigate, the truth will come out; and there's proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
2. So are you suggesting we sit idly by and do nothing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 08:47 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. No. I'm not suggesting doing nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
farmbo
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 08:56 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Think about what you're saying: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:23 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. How will your plan of having a Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:52 AM Response to Reply #5 |
40. The BULLYCONS win again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 11:08 AM Response to Reply #40 |
44. Deleted message |
goclark
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 11:30 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. I would not dare to say you are delusional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eye_on_prize
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:48 PM Response to Reply #46 |
93. Beautifully said goclark. It's just amazing to me how some people can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wabbajack
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 03:39 AM Response to Reply #46 |
156. Wtf is a pucker? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vektor
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 05:23 AM Response to Reply #156 |
159. Tee-hee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wabbajack
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 01:30 PM Response to Reply #159 |
160. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vektor
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 05:23 AM Response to Reply #46 |
158. What's that?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darknyte7
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 12:24 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. A kind suggestion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 10:54 PM Response to Reply #44 |
149. WRONG... It's A Belief In Our Own People |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 05:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
105. Oh come off it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
144. almost certain negative public reaction? without the MSM 20% of the public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 02:56 AM Response to Reply #5 |
151. Negative from who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. No one expects an instant victory. Heroes are far from meaningless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joevoter
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
4. A Dem running for office in an election rigged buy the neocons is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Child_Of_Isis
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
6. God forbid a Dem look bad in public. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:02 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. This isn't about a dem looking bad in public, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Child_Of_Isis
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:17 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. So, you believe they won the elction? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katinmn
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:33 AM Response to Reply #11 |
33. Our message is simple: We demand fair elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:39 PM Response to Reply #11 |
89. Repubs have done more than just tapping into the "prevailing zeitgeist" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eye_on_prize
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 05:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
99. Dems not having "clear message" is because they are spineless Bush-lite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:39 PM Response to Reply #11 |
143. So, it's not an issue for you, so it shouldn't be for anyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 03:01 AM Response to Reply #11 |
152. Well, hot damn, then standing up should clarify our message! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FULL_METAL_HAT
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
7. Don't worry -- the secret plan does an end run around MSM... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Last Lemming
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 11:02 AM Response to Reply #7 |
43. These are the times that try men's souls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FULL_METAL_HAT
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 12:14 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. Sweet quote... & I heard he was in the Jackson's Hole... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Last Lemming
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:01 PM Response to Reply #49 |
83. I'm merely an amateur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Last Lemming
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:07 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. You know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 09:13 AM Response to Reply #84 |
131. Does B*sh really have a 30 min radio show? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icehenge
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 03:12 AM Response to Reply #49 |
153. Kofi Annan connection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwhite0570
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
8. I totally disagree......that is what the repugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:05 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I'm not suggesting we fade away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:55 AM Response to Reply #12 |
22. Why debate your points? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
59. Why don't we make a list of the PRO's v. CON's of a Senator objecting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eye_on_prize
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 05:25 PM Response to Reply #12 |
101. I find it interesting U R so obtuse about the extent of fraud and so .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
10. Oh yeah? Then explain how Hayes was elected in 1876? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:18 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I know that Tilden "won" by a margin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thanatonautos
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 04:00 AM Response to Reply #14 |
157. I don't know how conclusive the evidence for fraud was in Hayes-Tilden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sportndandy
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
16. One high-profile senator is all we need. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
17. there is a chance we can win if we don't give up the fight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BonnieJW
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:59 AM Response to Reply #17 |
24. I've written to all the Dem Senators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katinmn
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:36 AM Response to Reply #24 |
35. Great letter, Bonnie! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:57 AM Response to Reply #24 |
41. Splendid. That pretty much sums it up right there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:04 AM Response to Reply #17 |
27. for one thing your use of the word loose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbond56
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
18. It does seem pointless but broaden your perspective. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
19. It is an excercise in futility. If you remember house members |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:44 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. 18 percent of a "Fringe Society" controls America now....why shouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:47 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I am not making a value judgement here, just stating the undeniable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k8conant
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:04 AM Response to Reply #21 |
28. We need to stand AGAINST political "reality"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 02:56 PM Response to Reply #28 |
65. When you stand against reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:01 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. No one is standing against reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:20 PM Response to Reply #67 |
87. You're standing for truth as you perceive it - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eye_on_prize
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:25 PM Response to Reply #87 |
122. Not seeing "proof of fraud" is not a legitimate opinion, in my opinion.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:01 AM Response to Reply #19 |
26. A fair amount of Am. people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:21 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. More support then than now without a doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:52 AM Response to Reply #19 |
39. Kerry's future political ambitions will be stymied by this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 11:43 AM Response to Reply #19 |
47. It was on Michael Moore's screen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
23. there's no such thing as bad pr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:41 AM Response to Reply #23 |
38. I never said it was extreme. I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sickinohio
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:28 PM Response to Reply #23 |
76. I think they are already manipulating and again "brainwashing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
molly
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
25. What a wonderful positive fighting attitude you have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
29. Forgive me if I am wrong, but wouldn't the move hold up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:24 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Yes, for all of about 2 hours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:31 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. the hold up or the media coverage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemis12
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:34 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. The debate is two hours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liam97
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:37 AM Response to Reply #32 |
36. No never stand up for what is right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liam97
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:39 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. My response was to the original post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:03 PM Response to Reply #32 |
113. Don't you think the media knows the possibility exists and therefore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 03:30 AM Response to Reply #31 |
155. At the very least... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
42. Doing the right thing is never pointless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 11:24 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Amen. Also, we'll be making history and the media will have to report it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Child_Of_Isis
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 12:11 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. That's right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:02 PM Response to Reply #45 |
68. if the Representatives and the Senator(s) who stand up give |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #68 |
82. Jiggering the exit polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:12 PM Response to Reply #82 |
86. Once again - read more about exit polls at this web site: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kashka-Kat
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
51. I respectfully disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 02:48 PM Response to Reply #51 |
63. Very well said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:07 PM Response to Reply #51 |
69. about Gore winning Florida - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 07:01 PM Response to Reply #69 |
108. Sure do believe its worth doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
52. You absolutely do *not* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Judged
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
53. Are you suggesting that to press on the cause, is to defeat ourselves? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
54. What you don't seem to understand... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
55. and the strategic advantge of NOT standing up would be ??? wtf eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue State Blues
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
56. Why Rosa Parks refusing to give up her seat on the bus was pointless... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pam-Moby
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Must we forget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 06:54 PM Response to Reply #57 |
107. The MSM would have a feeding-fest n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 02:49 PM Response to Reply #56 |
64. Excellent response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:09 PM Response to Reply #56 |
71. I appreciate your thoughts, but your analogy is severely lacking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zann725
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
58. What we don't need days before the EV count is more NAY-SAYING! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:19 PM Response to Reply #58 |
75. So your saying that unless we agree with your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:08 PM Response to Reply #75 |
120. No, not "Fascist". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
60. It is indeed important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
61. oh my...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:11 PM Response to Reply #61 |
72. A Dem politician would have to be asleep for failing to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
62. What is the cabal expecting us to do> Answer: ROLL OVER AGAIN ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
66. It's never pointless to do the right thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:15 PM Response to Reply #66 |
74. I believe it is debatable as to whether it is the "right thing" but for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:34 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. Defending our base of voters is NOT a misguided stand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:52 PM Response to Reply #78 |
94. Fine, that is admirable, but a Senator standing in contest of what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Machiavelli05
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
70. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:36 PM Response to Reply #70 |
88. OK! Which of you shite-hawks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Machiavelli05
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 05:24 PM Response to Reply #88 |
100. youre not too smart, are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 03:47 PM Response to Reply #100 |
134. That's the kind of question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:40 PM Response to Reply #100 |
146. Of course, I realise that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Machiavelli05
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 02:47 AM Response to Reply #146 |
150. By missing my point, you proved my point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eye_on_prize
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 11:11 PM Response to Reply #70 |
126. Jan 6th IS the Constitutionally prescribed venue for challenging election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:01 PM Response to Reply #126 |
135. If there is clear and convincing evidence such that a large % |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berniew1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
73. You are mistaken; if they fail to certify, Kerry likely to win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
77. This is about standing up for our constituents! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:15 PM Response to Reply #77 |
121. Excellent point and dead right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
79. Deleted message |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:41 PM Response to Reply #79 |
90. That's not what he is saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
80. Disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:09 PM Response to Reply #80 |
85. It's certainly not any other day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Helga Scow Stern
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
81. Senators standing up is the beginning of reform. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 10:57 AM Response to Reply #81 |
132. Symbolic maybe, but impotent and insignificant. Want reform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Helga Scow Stern
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:16 PM Response to Reply #132 |
139. What do you mean? The evidence is all over the place. And I love the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:24 PM Response to Reply #139 |
141. post # 111 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigBearJohn
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
91. WHY CALI'S WHOLE THREAD IS POINTLESS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:55 PM Response to Reply #91 |
95. Or perhaps DeLay's staff's exploitation of Native American businesses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
92. If lots of Senators refuse to certify though, they will have to cover it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:57 PM Response to Reply #92 |
96. Oh the MSM will cover it, don't you doubt it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 05:05 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. How do you know there is no hard evidence of fraud?????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 05:37 PM Response to Reply #98 |
102. They have not released anything compelling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
euler
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:53 PM Response to Reply #102 |
117. Arnebeck case was a joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 05:38 PM Response to Reply #98 |
103. There may be - but if there is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 05:41 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. I hope there is, but I 'm sure they would not be sharing it with us yet if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:01 PM Response to Reply #96 |
112. The Diebold Machines have already damaged the Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:09 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. It is not the Republicans that will think it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:26 PM Response to Reply #114 |
123. I am not sure what country you have been in over the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:31 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. Your mistake is you're thinking that whoever runs in 2008 will run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:43 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. And you think there will be a 2008 "election"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 08:31 AM Response to Reply #125 |
130. You can go to a gun fight with a "nuclear bomb" if you want but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 02:58 PM Response to Reply #124 |
161. and your mistake is thinking we will not still be at war..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eye_on_prize
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 11:23 PM Response to Reply #96 |
128. be careful too what you "fear" the outcome will be = neg. spell casting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lostnote03
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
97. "You think the public will rally......" , I believe they already have.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinnie From Indy
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
106. Democrats MUST Fight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 07:18 PM Response to Reply #106 |
110. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 07:27 PM Response to Reply #110 |
111. Deleted message |
euler
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 10:00 PM Response to Reply #111 |
119. This particular post speaks for me as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 10:35 PM Response to Reply #111 |
147. your name describes you perfectly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
euler
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:58 PM Response to Reply #110 |
118. Not a single one of these... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 10:40 PM Response to Reply #118 |
148. tell that to the people who were not allowed to vote because they lived in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 08:15 AM Response to Reply #110 |
129. Glad it felt good because I have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 11:11 PM Response to Reply #106 |
127. Let's get ready to rumble ! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:06 PM Response to Reply #127 |
145. i got your back! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
109. Huh?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
molly
![]() |
Sun Jan-02-05 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
115. Pssssst - it will be LIVE on C-Span |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malatesta1137
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
133. the only culprit is JOHN KERRY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
m.standridge
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:03 PM Response to Reply #133 |
136. White states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
m.standridge
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:07 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. correction: once in place, it CAN'T be displaced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
138. So the American Revolution was fought by a bunch of people playing it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:20 PM Response to Reply #138 |
140. With all do respect ,If that's an anology it is just about the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:32 PM Response to Reply #140 |
142. oh snap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 03:17 AM Response to Original message |
154. Bullies never stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC