|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
dzika
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:23 PM Original message |
SUPPORT SENATOR WYDEN (D-OR) TO OBJECT TO 2004 ELECTION |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Not_Giving_Up
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. You mean we have Senator to stand up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dzika
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. It says "if fraud was found"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merwin
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
2. IF fraud is found? It's already BEEN found n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
euler
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
33. Not everyone agrees. In fact, most don't. I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myschkin
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:33 PM Response to Reply #33 |
78. So... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
In Truth We Trust
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 06:29 PM Response to Reply #33 |
99. Then you are misinformed. I suggest you look into it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Not_Giving_Up
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. Dupe - Self Deleting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthpusher
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. Is this a new statement from him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GregD
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. It does not appear to be, and I feel the title is misleading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quakerfriend
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
5. Rock on Sen. Wyden! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKthatsIT
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
7. I WILL VOTE for him in 2008...Presidential Election!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
8. Does this mean we have our "at least one senator"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redneck Socialist
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
9. "...if election fraud was found." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demnan
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Yeah, sadly, I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
35. i read "if election fraud is found" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redneck Socialist
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:05 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. I hope you're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SueZhope
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
11. is this a way of getting him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seito
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
12. And so it begins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jo March
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
75. seito, I told hubby that I needed a fax machine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 06:58 PM Response to Reply #75 |
115. What's the kool aid reference I keep seeing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
birdsmedicine
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
14. Very misleading! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joevoter
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:53 PM Response to Reply #14 |
31. Not intended to be misleading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasChick
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
76. eh, nevermind. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildflower
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
15. Does he have all the info? (Statement is from Nov. 3) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 07:55 PM Response to Reply #15 |
106. We're working on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renate
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
16. he's my senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
17. "if election fraud was found" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Wonder if he'll settle for widespread compelling evidence of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pam-Moby
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
18. What bothers me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liam97
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:36 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Dzika, why not edit the headline to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dzika
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Added the word "support" to the title... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:07 PM Response to Reply #18 |
41. THIS gives the answers to "I will contest if fraud is found"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stand and Fight
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
21. Recommend change in title of thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:39 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. I second that. Please edit headline! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dzika
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Subject has been changed. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
22. Here's my email to Wyden: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
23. I see his on-line form only accepts OR addresses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:40 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. I just wrote my state in with my city. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. That's actually what I did too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:08 PM Response to Reply #23 |
42. MANY of us in OR have been supporting, requesting, asking, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:13 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. That's great to hear. Keep up the good work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Verve
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:17 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. Keep up the good work Amaryllis! We're all grateful! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 07:50 PM Response to Reply #47 |
105. It takes all of us! I am a Lord of the Rings fan and I often think how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
28. Misleading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dzika
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. sorry... I changed the title |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joevoter
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
36. Please see post 31 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eye_on_prize
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
29. I just phoned Wydens office in PDX and...according to his staff... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
43. Do you know about this meeting in Portland Tuesday? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eye_on_prize
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 03:10 PM Response to Reply #43 |
61. yes, I've been to several and 'll probably be there Tues. too.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Left Brain
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:23 PM Response to Reply #29 |
49. WHERE ARE YOU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eye_on_prize
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 03:12 PM Response to Reply #49 |
64. I'm in NE , near 29th and Knott. His office is near Lloyd center ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Left Brain
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 03:33 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. Yes, 2:30 it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eye_on_prize
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 03:43 PM Response to Reply #67 |
71. yes. 700 NE Mult. let's meet in front . see you there at 2:30 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
34. my letter which i'm sending to MY senators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout1071
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
37. So excited, then so disappointed after reading the big, fat "IF"..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:03 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. so--there is no proven (legally) fraud found at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:12 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myschkin
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:44 PM Response to Reply #44 |
80. More evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 08:10 PM Response to Reply #44 |
107. YOU GUYS! See this! THEY ARE CONGRESS. They don't have to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joevoter
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 08:53 PM Response to Reply #107 |
109. Great post - best talking points that I have seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout1071
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:56 PM Response to Reply #38 |
59. I did not say that at all. I said that I was disappointed with the title |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 06:36 PM Response to Reply #38 |
101. Up is down, down is up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
39. I called and e mailed his office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
46. Problem is, no election fraud was found |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joevoter
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:20 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. systematic voter disenfranchisement is not OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:23 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Hard evidence please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roseBudd
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:26 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Are names in a roster book with ballot stub numbers but no corresponding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:28 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dzika
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:48 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. I spoke to someone today in Ohio... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 03:12 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. And Kerry had a "secret plan" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myschkin
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:57 PM Response to Reply #62 |
82. We have pieces of circumstantial evidence but not the murder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:05 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. There are three types of lies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myschkin
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:20 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. But there is a feeling for justice... - do you have it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:23 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. Enoguh evidencec to investigate? Sure, investigate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myschkin
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:54 PM Response to Reply #86 |
93. Sorry, but you sound a bit cynic to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 08:19 PM Response to Reply #93 |
108. I've listened to the shit for four years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dzika
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 06:24 PM Response to Reply #62 |
98. "a major report that will detail that full body of evidence" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:27 PM Response to Reply #53 |
77. you need intent for fraud, and you need an investigation to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zan_of_Texas
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 03:27 PM Response to Reply #50 |
66. There is evidence of election laws being broken, Walt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Verve
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:24 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. What? The triad guy tampering with the machine and talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:42 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. No, that's not fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Verve
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 03:04 PM Response to Reply #56 |
60. There is no hard evidence because this election was not TRANSPARENT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 03:13 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. The burden of proof is on the accusers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 03:36 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Are you a lawyer? Just curious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 03:42 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. that's silly - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:11 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. Okay, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:19 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. You're misinformed even about how the elections officials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Exit
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:52 AM Response to Reply #74 |
112. I disagree. The fraud is real. Bob Fitzrakis has an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:05 PM Response to Reply #70 |
84. That's Blackwell's argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:36 PM Response to Reply #84 |
87. so let's see - you commit a crime of monumental |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:45 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. so let's see - you have x number of days to do a recount |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 06:04 PM Response to Reply #88 |
94. the suspension of disbelief that is required |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 06:08 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. Let's hope for your sake it's a porkpie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 06:15 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. so by that comment am I to understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 06:22 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. Not possible in my current situation, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 06:33 PM Response to Reply #97 |
100. Well, if not you, any Ohioan (is that what they are called?) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenca
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 09:18 PM Response to Reply #97 |
110. YOU KNOW THAT SAYING..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JBear
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:33 PM Response to Reply #70 |
117. Not so fast..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:42 PM Response to Reply #68 |
79. Sorry dude, I'm just putting the reality out there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
In Truth We Trust
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 07:02 PM Response to Reply #79 |
103. There is Prima Facie evidence of fraud and if you don't like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 07:33 PM Response to Reply #56 |
104. Anyone who has not seen the evidence as presented to the Senators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idealista
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:34 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. precinct in Miami County, Ohio w/ all but 10 registered voters voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:40 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Why should somebody be truthful with you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 02:51 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. gosh, maybe they thought to ask/check whether these folks were registered? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 03:12 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. Maybe their cards were out of date? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 06:41 PM Response to Reply #63 |
102. I am AMAZED at WaltStarr's knowledge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildflower
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 03:41 PM Response to Reply #55 |
69. Is voter suppression technically considered fraud? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
73. Wow, this is great news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eye_on_prize
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
81. My letter to Senator Ron Wyden - hand delivered today with peitition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Verve
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #81 |
90. Thank you Eye on Prize. You're what every DU member should strive to be! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:53 PM Response to Reply #81 |
92. Excellent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joevoter
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 06:16 PM Response to Reply #81 |
113. Thanks... I posted the letter on the votewyden site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaya
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
89. Is this thread a little misleading? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Verve
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 05:52 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. Yes! Look at post 14 and others. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madbelgiancow
![]() |
Mon Jan-03-05 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
111. kick for action |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drummer55
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
114. organizations in oregon you can join in oregon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnowerOfLogic
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
116. This statement is typical ass-cover; he'll stand up if it's popular. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC