|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
|
| bones_7672
|
Tue Jan-04-05 12:54 PM Original message |
| Cleveland Plain Dealer to Jackson, Tubbs-Jones: "Please, let it go" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PROGRESSIVE1
|
Tue Jan-04-05 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. The RACIST Plain Dealer should just SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Snivi Yllom
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 9. Where did you detect racism in that editorial? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| genieroze
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:20 PM Original message |
| I guess you missed the good part. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Snivi Yllom
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. What was racist about that? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Vektor
|
Tue Jan-04-05 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 44. This is offensive on so many levels... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Zhade
|
Tue Jan-04-05 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 46. Wow, that's pretty harsh. The whole editorial is. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HeeBGBz
|
Tue Jan-04-05 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 48. I find it extremely offensive and condescending. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cyberpj
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 26. where did you NOT detect it? Go away. eom |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pbartch
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 17. I'm appalled by this language: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The Gigmeister
|
Tue Jan-04-05 06:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 47. Where is the racism?? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| malatesta1137
|
Wed Jan-05-05 08:43 AM Response to Reply #47 |
| 60. You should learn to read. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Alizaryn
|
Tue Jan-04-05 12:58 PM Original message |
| The white noise is only going to get louder and more nasty. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| whometense
|
Tue Jan-04-05 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Didn't they endorse *??? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| righteous1
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. No, they gave no endorsement this time |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| whometense
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 15. Thanks. I stand |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| me b zola
|
Tue Jan-04-05 06:41 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 49. If they had integrity they would endorse American Democracy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| whometense
|
Tue Jan-04-05 06:43 PM Response to Reply #49 |
| 51. Can't argue |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sickinohio
|
Tue Jan-04-05 07:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 55. Only because they thought better of it - they thought about |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bones_7672
|
Wed Jan-05-05 08:17 AM Response to Reply #55 |
| 59. editorial staff wanted to endorse Kerry, but the Boss wanted Bush |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| zbdent
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 23. No, but they were forced into not endorsing anybody |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mountainvue
|
Tue Jan-04-05 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Bastards. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cocoa
|
Tue Jan-04-05 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. utterly irrelevant |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| zann725
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Please pass that 'let it go' to dead horse beat-er himself, Dino Rossi! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| impeachthescoundrel
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. I read it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Looks like they need a few friendly notes. "So, how long has |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. Contact information |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 12. Letter to the "Editor" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| super simian
|
Wed Jan-05-05 09:30 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 61. Good One! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| roenyc
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. OMG |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| genieroze
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. Recounted my ass, the whole state wasn't recounted. What a moron. eom |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pgh_dem
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. This part of the editorial is right out of the bus terminal toilet |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Chimpanzee
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:44 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 21. Long lines built more than voter frustration |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Der Blaue Engel
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 24. Oh, it all comes clear to me now! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SueZhope
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. why would anyone |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mod mom
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Read, investigate, this is about democracy! The ELECTION WAS A SHAM! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SlowDownFast
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. my email to the editor..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Chimpanzee
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. OMG! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cyberpj
|
Tue Jan-04-05 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. Condescending Racist PartySpeak Idiots will come, now, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bunny planet
|
Tue Jan-04-05 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 27. What is with this paper? What are they hiding? Who are they the mouthpiece |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| genieroze
|
Tue Jan-04-05 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. Does this moron really think that the pukes want this crap fixed? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| grasswire
|
Tue Jan-04-05 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. my letter |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| musette_sf
|
Tue Jan-04-05 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. I wrote and let them know I was DISGUSTED |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Doremus
|
Tue Jan-04-05 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. Here's the contact information for the Op-Ed Editor |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Doremus
|
Tue Jan-04-05 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. Outrageous. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IndyOp
|
Tue Jan-04-05 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. Yesterday in Columbus Jackson & Tubbs-Jones were laughing at |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Padme Amidala
|
Tue Jan-04-05 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. If the results were switched and votes were lost, how do they know? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Helga Scow Stern
|
Tue Jan-04-05 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. Memo to The Plain Dealer: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SlowDownFast
|
Tue Jan-04-05 04:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 41. excellent letter! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Straight Shooter
|
Tue Jan-04-05 07:46 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 56. Oh, you nailed it. YOU NAILED IT!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Helga Scow Stern
|
Tue Jan-04-05 07:57 PM Response to Reply #56 |
| 58. Gee, thanks! If they "actually print" my letter, I might fall out |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HeeBGBz
|
Tue Jan-04-05 07:55 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 57. Nice, Ojai! Well spoken. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Tue Jan-04-05 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. Mind boggling. I hope Conyers and Jackson get a |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Carolab
|
Tue Jan-04-05 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. Oh yeah, let's just let voters rights and democracy go. No problem. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Broken Acorn
|
Tue Jan-04-05 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 38. Please let it go... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Al-CIAda
|
Tue Jan-04-05 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. Commentary- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| johnnie
|
Tue Jan-04-05 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 40. This is why I canceled that pos paper years ago. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bones_7672
|
Tue Jan-04-05 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 42. Anyone try to contact the Plain Dealer today? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Vektor
|
Tue Jan-04-05 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 43. Tubbs-Jones is a cool lady.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| yojon
|
Tue Jan-04-05 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 45. Editorial page writer can stick his paper up his ass |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raksha
|
Tue Jan-04-05 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 50. Wow!!! It sounds like they're really afraid of something. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bones_7672
|
Tue Jan-04-05 07:09 PM Response to Reply #50 |
| 54. What? This is the opinion of a Lib paper in one of Ohio's most |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raksha
|
Tue Jan-04-05 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 52. Okay, I just read the whole thing. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Tue Jan-04-05 07:02 PM Response to Reply #52 |
| 53. There's contact info up the thread. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| super simian
|
Wed Jan-05-05 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 62. Obvious Racism! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Feb 15th 2026, 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC