|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
VTGold
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:20 PM Original message |
Raw Story: Blackwell bragging about helping 'deliver' Ohio for Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
1. " QUACK " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTGold
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. Thank heaven they feel so bullet proof - makes them sing like birds n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slor
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. Dodo birds n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. as the chairman of the Bush Cheney OH Reelection Campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
impeachthescoundrel
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. CanariesRUs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. What do you mean, I don't understand ya! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnfound
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. I agree, but guess we'll know when we read the letter nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lostnote03
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
38. This is not an innocent statement imo...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:28 PM Response to Reply #38 |
58. Oh, it's far from innocent. And very damning! t/c |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pam-Moby
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
5. yes thanks but on what channel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnfound
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Not on any channel -- on rawstory.com nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pam-Moby
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. ok thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTGold
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Raw Story website.... rawstory.com |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodboy
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
10. I thought wally o'dell said that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
11. How else is he going to get GOP contributions? He has to brag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brundle_Fly
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
12. brad has a little more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTGold
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. oooh! I can't tell you how much I want to see that man squirm n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:42 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Jeez. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quakerfriend
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. THx for the tid bits, brundle fly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. wonderful timing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 09:53 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Their timing is impeckable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BarbinMD
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
20. Holy- Moly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seshers
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
21. Is it 10 yet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rawstory
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
22. DELAY -- sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:07 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. np |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. thanks for the heads up.... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
henslee
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:14 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Wow. Rawstory posts? Cool What next? Time? Buzzflash? Drudge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pbartch
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:19 PM Response to Reply #27 |
48. I just emailed the RAWSTORY story about SOB Blackwell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chomskysright
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:28 PM Response to Reply #48 |
131. e mailed to these OH papers.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTGold
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:15 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. 7 pages - yum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bones_7672
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
25. so far, sounds like "much ado about nothing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:14 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Oh really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:15 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. How Do You Know It's NOT Walt Starr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seshers
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:15 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. OR... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:53 PM Response to Reply #25 |
74. But it is beyond the pale |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:56 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. it is a conflict of interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:49 AM Response to Reply #75 |
97. Not illegal, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 03:14 AM Response to Reply #97 |
100. if there is an "appearance of impropriety" - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:31 AM Response to Reply #74 |
93. Rove flew to Nevada with the chimp last year to meet with our Governor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Farmgirl
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
31. Looks like the story is up...up, up and away!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malikshah
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:24 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Kick--for it being posted--- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Not a Sheep
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
33. Here's the link to the story ........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
34. Great read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melissa G
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:32 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Kick for Raw Story! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
36. Good stuff! Conyers' team WITHIN the story shows you the case being laid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RevCheesehead
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
37. I swear, the man's hubris will be his downfall. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pbartch
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
39. THIS IS SOOOOOOO DISGUSTING. He belongs in PRISON. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Im with Rosey
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:30 PM Response to Reply #39 |
59. With any luck, he will be in prison! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KerryOn
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:40 PM Response to Reply #39 |
67. This will do him in big time: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
40. campaign letter is up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liam97
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:05 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Is he really going to get away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SicTransit
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:23 PM Response to Reply #41 |
53. of course he is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SueZhope
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:14 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. I read it and words can not convey the feelings inside |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:19 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. what a pathetic, grovelling slime ball |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SueZhope
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:33 PM Response to Reply #49 |
63. YUP ..you got it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
42. Everybody should download the donation page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thingsarelookingup
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
43. qualities that will serve him well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mary195149
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
44. I'm having problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
borealowl
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:19 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. It's code |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
45. What a scumbag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
47. Soliciting campaign contributions on SOS letterhead... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberty Belle
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:25 PM Response to Reply #47 |
55. No. It's blatantly illegal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:27 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Correct. You have identified a point of prosecution! You get a cookie. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberty Belle
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:38 PM Response to Reply #57 |
66. send it to Conyers and Arnebeck, please! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:42 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. I don't think it's "official" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:26 AM Response to Reply #70 |
82. Are you saying it's a hoax, or just a chain letter on SoS letterhead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:30 AM Response to Reply #82 |
84. I was talking the letterhead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:00 PM Response to Reply #55 |
127. Question, though: Is it official stationary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 04:28 PM Response to Reply #47 |
133. According to the article editor, it is NOT official letterhead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout1071
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
51. You have got to be kidding me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GetTheRightVote
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
52. We need to send this article/letter to other media to report as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:25 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. I think it's a sure thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pbartch
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:10 AM Response to Reply #52 |
77. I sent this letter to ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL THE MEDIA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTGold
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
56. Ethics aside - I've never read such a poorly written letter in my life! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:32 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. it's legit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtLiberty
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:41 PM Response to Reply #61 |
69. Let's make sure this letter is for real... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:44 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. did you read the main article? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
borealowl
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:33 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. State letterhead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:37 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. I don't think it's "official" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:40 PM Response to Reply #56 |
68. I can't imagine that this letter is real. He sounds like such an idiot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terre
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:51 PM Response to Reply #56 |
72. EXACTLY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 10:16 AM Response to Reply #56 |
112. LOL! I thought the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtLiberty
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
60. Is the GOP pulling another Dan Rather? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liam97
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:34 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Dear Rawstory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liam97
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:52 PM Response to Reply #60 |
73. The article notes that Blackwell's office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Tue Jan-04-05 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
76. Blackwell has made several statements before that are in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:29 AM Response to Reply #76 |
83. For the record: Yes, I am a card- carrying member of the ACLU... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:36 AM Original message |
exactly.... thanx n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:48 AM Response to Reply #83 |
96. Deleted - Cause this guy really hates Blackwell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 09:59 AM Response to Reply #83 |
108. I saw that movie again the other day... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Earth
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:36 AM Response to Reply #76 |
88. hahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txindy
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
78. Blackwell's not the brightest crayon in the box, writing this letter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kitty1
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:15 AM Response to Original message |
79. This has just hit Buzzflash. Spreading like wildfire. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SueZhope
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:21 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. heeeeeeeehaaaaaaaa!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
81. What a blatant partisan! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:31 AM Response to Reply #81 |
85. Such a blatant statement acknowledging the commingling of his official..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SueZhope
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:33 AM Response to Reply #81 |
86. shower might not be enough we need an exorcist n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loritooker
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
87. Ugh! I feel like I just read a letter from a bill collector! Yuk!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doremus
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
89. May he rot in hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rehema
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
90. Blackwell Letter is no smoking gun in my opinion n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
91. Okay so I'm reading the letter... and I don't know if this is a mistake or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:43 AM Response to Reply #91 |
95. defining the liberal opponent sounds like the Rove marketing plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarahlee
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:06 AM Response to Original message |
92. More Ohio food for thought/research |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ntwkgirl
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:37 AM Response to Original message |
94. I faxed the letter to Senators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:50 AM Response to Original message |
98. We should get a copy of his mailing list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bj2110
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 03:11 AM Response to Original message |
99. For some reason, I feel floored. This seems like something... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bj2110
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 04:42 AM Response to Original message |
101. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakemewhenitsover
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 05:13 AM Response to Original message |
102. "Unapologetic liberal"?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Twist_U_Up
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 06:47 AM Response to Original message |
103. why does he need money ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 09:33 AM Response to Reply #103 |
105. P.O.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stargazer09
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
104. The man is sick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jn2375
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
106. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
107. What's the big deal? It's a poorly written form letter. Probably sent to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:09 AM Response to Reply #107 |
113. are you kidding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:13 AM Response to Reply #113 |
114. He's the head of the Bush-Cheney re-election committee, for crap's sake!. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:20 AM Response to Reply #114 |
116. I suggest you read the main article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:25 AM Response to Reply #116 |
118. Partisan political hacks RUN THIS COUNTRY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:16 PM Response to Reply #116 |
128. Yes, and in NY state it's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 04:11 PM Response to Reply #128 |
132. bring forward one bit of information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 05:27 PM Response to Reply #132 |
136. Ah, but that's not the issue I was responding to, now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 06:42 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. nice of you to side skirt the point at hand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bmoney07
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
109. Does Conyers knows about this???????????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 10:14 AM Response to Reply #109 |
111. Yes, Conyer's response is embedded towards the end of the story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grumpy old fart
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:29 AM Response to Reply #109 |
119. Conyers response in the RAW story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
110. I find it shocking only in that it highlights the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyrone Slothrop
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:56 AM Response to Reply #110 |
121. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
115. far out. although this line struck me as an example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katinmn
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
117. It was the first thing I read this morning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jn2375
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
120. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
3smos
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:29 PM Response to Reply #120 |
122. authentic? - I'd love it to be but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
123. Deleted message |
AmerDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:24 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. multi post error, deleted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:25 PM Response to Reply #123 |
125. look what we have here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
go west young man
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #123 |
126. Can someone say Freeper alert! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:22 PM Response to Reply #126 |
130. It's a reasonable question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 04:38 PM Response to Reply #123 |
134. Does need to be checked carefully |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coffeenap
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
129. Don't know if the letter is true, but funds are being raised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
135. Could you please enlarge on how B's office confirmed this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 17th 2024, 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC