|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 04:52 PM Original message |
Well It's Happening, The RPubs Are Talking About 08 Challenge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Streetdoc270
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. what majority... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brainshrub
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. And how the heck is that going to happen if votes don't count? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. There is a good chance that we will have a Democratic Senate by.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. I like your optimism but most folks on both sides of the aisle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. How the HELL can the Democrats be losing seat in THREE.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. No, you misunderstand what I meant, we would pick up 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:40 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Thanks for the correction! Let's try for 51 in 06', but i'll.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Huge GOP screw up, hmmmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:36 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. The first one happened before the election and you know the results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:41 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Ah, the first is carried into this term by virtue of the fact that the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. I try and dismiss nothing, do try to be a realist as to the political |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:49 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I'm sorry, your thoughts (or is it just your post) seem incomplete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 09:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
58. I am very realistic, you should try to be less condescending. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 09:17 AM Response to Reply #58 |
62. I am sorry you feel that way, my intent is neither to marginalize or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 08:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
55. I don't agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 08:52 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Cali I respect your opinion, but this time I must disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 09:13 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. You're right. I assume Iraq will be a mess in 18 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. This is why three things are extraordinarily important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Yes, but the difference this time was the members challenging |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Oh, I'd love to see that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. You need to realize we would have to be squeeky clean in the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I understand that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I don't know if proving massive fraud is neccessary. Just bringing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:44 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. I honestly don't think Americans would stand for Congress ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemis12
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 06:07 PM Response to Reply #9 |
30. Well many, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:04 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Of course we supported it ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyjack27
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
4. yahoo news voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
5. I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 04:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. The Republicans opened the can of worms in December 2000! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. They were the one's who went to the Supreme Court -- n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mohinoaklawnillinois
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
12. Good Lord, that site cited in your link is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. You want to see the manure field you gots to tiptoe thru a few cowpies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
14. No worries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:01 AM Response to Reply #14 |
61. I agree. It's one thing to deny, deny, deny. Let them try making the case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
26. Aww, screw them. They're gonna be SO hurting in '08. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
28. I don't understand the logic here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:10 PM Response to Reply #28 |
41. A challenge in 2000 made a lot more sense then it does this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smartvoter
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
29. False logic -- Damned if you do; Damned if you don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 06:14 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. That's neither what I said or meant. I was against the contest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smartvoter
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 06:32 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. We see it differently. It would have been a stunt if the system was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:01 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. To me a more potentially more impactful excercise would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemis12
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:06 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. I hope that happens... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:13 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Probably not, because the charges of machine rigging and electronic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mohinoaklawnillinois
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 06:45 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Righteous1, you keep saying "clear and convincing evidence". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 06:59 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. I simply don't feel that the contest made significant election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:34 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. Great concept, but I seriously doubt it's realistic. We have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vektor
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
32. One thing at a time! Let's win the presidency first!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
33. exactly what I was worried about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
39. There's a big difference between a symbolic effort and changing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thanatonautos
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
43. This is silliness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:28 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Why do you think that Frist is so hesitant to impliment the so called |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thanatonautos
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:59 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Two possible reasons ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thanatonautos
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 08:09 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Also remember that the Repubs are getting most of their Judicial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 08:11 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. The second thought you propose may be right although it just about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thanatonautos
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 08:28 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Sounds like an interesting article ... I don't know how the votes would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 08:39 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Well I agree with you completely on that. I believe the contest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thanatonautos
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 09:07 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. I don't think it was akin to the `nuclear' option precisely because it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 10:03 AM Response to Reply #57 |
63. That's where we disagree. Republicans don't seem to be the wounded ones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 08:05 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. These people don't care about precedent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sepia_steel
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
47. Pffffffffffft |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyPriest
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
52. I say: BRING IT ON! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouvet_Island
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
53. This is why you have to have a transparent system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
60. ROFLMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC