|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 08:13 AM Original message |
WE NEED A NATIONAL POLL: WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirrera
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
1. Mitofski should do it FREE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 12:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. I don't think we want him to do it - we want clean data, not corrupted. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sick_of_Rethuggery
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
2. I was thinking along the same lines... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugin
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
3. Good thinking TIA. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
4. You do a poll like that, and I guarantee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wabbajack
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 10:51 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. That seems impossible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:04 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Why does it seem impossible - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jkd
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 03:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
49. This could work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:28 AM Response to Reply #49 |
59. And that is available information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wabbajack
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 05:00 AM Response to Reply #7 |
107. Where did all those votes go? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NationalEnquirer
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Right! And people will LIE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:26 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Very few will LIE. Why should they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NationalEnquirer
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:46 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. They lie because they can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 12:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. An open count? How about a verified paper ballot? Repugs voted NO on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenca
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 01:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. oh, c'mon would YOU lie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NationalEnquirer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:43 AM Response to Reply #16 |
69. I wouldnt lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 09:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
34. Another BS argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:40 AM Response to Reply #34 |
65. I agree. If lying made a decisive impact on the results I would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NationalEnquirer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:44 AM Response to Reply #34 |
70. I am saying that either way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:27 AM Response to Reply #4 |
58. Not if you poll those who signed in on the poll books. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fly by night
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
5. I thought Zogby did do a post-election poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greenmutha
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 12:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Zogby has the questions in his current poll! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NationalEnquirer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 12:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
72. Why doesn't Zogby say something about the election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintCooper2003
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 12:37 PM Response to Reply #13 |
75. Online polling is totally inaccurate. Zogby showed Kerry behind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fly by night
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 06:32 PM Response to Reply #75 |
88. The Tennessee results are not free from question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintCooper2003
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 02:38 AM Response to Reply #88 |
120. The Tennesse results matched the exit polls, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fly by night
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 09:12 AM Response to Reply #120 |
125. That's why we need to know the TN precincts that were included. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:50 PM Response to Reply #125 |
126. In Memphis we had touchscreen as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 09:42 PM Response to Reply #13 |
98. Do you or does anyone have a direct link to the poll itself? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 07:23 AM Response to Reply #98 |
108. Zogby does have a post election poll -- but you have to be a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
12. Only problem: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anaxarchos
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 01:18 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. It's called "the bandwagon effect" and it is well documented... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 03:30 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. It was done, shortly after the elections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anaxarchos
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 09:13 PM Response to Reply #21 |
31. I believe it was just asked as a question in approval polls... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 10:48 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. You know what might be helpful... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anamandujano
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
41. Awesome information but can't access the link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anaxarchos
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:42 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Sorry, Try this one.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anamandujano
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:48 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Thanks, it works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 09:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
35. Nobody's on Bush's bandwagon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:29 AM Response to Reply #12 |
61. Under ordinary circumstances perhaps, but given |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
15. In my small backwoods East Texas town |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zimba
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
18. Good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emcguffie
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
19. Yes. Yes. That's a start. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mistwell
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
20. Problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaganPreacher
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
22. False premise: A or B |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 04:12 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I didn't mean A or B in the literal sense. Of course other questions would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mistwell
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 04:30 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Non-response rate issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaganPreacher
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 05:24 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. OK, a phone poll (not to be confused with a "phone pole")..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anamandujano
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:30 PM Response to Reply #27 |
40. A poll of those selected from actual sign in sheets on election day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaganPreacher
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 12:07 AM Response to Reply #40 |
44. anamandujano, a faulty premise: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 12:16 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. ROTFL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anamandujano
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 12:25 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Rove is not a wizard, he's a dickwad with a huge propaganda arm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
25. Why not? Sounds like a plan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
floridadem30
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
26. excellent idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
super simian
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
28. OMG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scottxyz
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
29. We need to replace the corrupt voting system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pauldp
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
30. Hell Yeah! How do we get it done? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouvet_Island
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
32. That´s a great idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
33. How long have I been advocating this now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouvet_Island
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 10:41 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jkd
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 03:47 AM Response to Reply #33 |
50. Yes, I believe we had a brief exchange about this possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:31 AM Response to Reply #33 |
62. You, me and many others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 05:03 AM Response to Reply #33 |
123. I know. I'm hours late with this, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
38. TIA, have you asked Zogby? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greenmutha
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:29 AM Response to Reply #38 |
60. Zogby *is* doing it! Check out post#13: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisabtrucking
![]() |
Wed Jan-26-05 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
39. Voted for Kerry/Edwards. At least thats what I thought I did. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zann725
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
47. I think we shold be able to just "re-vote" (duplicate our vote) on-line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 12:54 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. IP addresses are not unique per individual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sacxtra
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 10:01 AM Response to Reply #48 |
130. don't forget about proxies n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sacxtra
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 10:01 AM Response to Reply #48 |
131. don't forget about proxies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 03:55 AM Response to Original message |
51. Post election poll right here for ya TIA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 03:25 AM Response to Reply #51 |
121. No data at your link, just asstrix |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 04:02 AM Response to Original message |
52. Another poll: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 10:32 AM Response to Reply #52 |
56. 800 sample size? Gallup? Sorry, trit, we can do better than that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:37 AM Response to Reply #56 |
64. Consider me one of the statistically challenged math-phobes yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anaxarchos
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 03:08 PM Response to Reply #64 |
77. They 'invented' it.... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 04:52 PM Response to Reply #56 |
81. You asked for a poll, I showed it to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 05:36 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. Your list of 50 LV's was from a Repub. site.Next time, if you are going to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 08:33 PM Response to Reply #84 |
93. I simply disagree with you that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 01:36 AM Response to Reply #93 |
104. NOW you admit RCP is a right-wing site. So why did you use it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 03:02 AM Response to Reply #104 |
106. Its not as though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintCooper2003
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 10:51 PM Response to Reply #52 |
100. Only 855 responses counted from a sample size of 1015. That leaves a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:37 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Probably because they didn't vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintCooper2003
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 04:43 AM Response to Original message |
53. I've been thinking about this for months.... it shall be done... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 07:44 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anaxarchos
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:35 AM Response to Reply #54 |
63. The science is straight forward... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintCooper2003
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 12:36 PM Response to Reply #54 |
74. Which Gallup numbers? I don't see any. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 08:11 PM Response to Reply #74 |
91. see post 52 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaganPreacher
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 01:20 PM Response to Reply #54 |
76. David: here's how: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 08:03 PM Response to Reply #76 |
90. There's this little problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 08:51 PM Response to Reply #90 |
96. Don't ask for "someone" if you want it done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaganPreacher
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 10:43 PM Response to Reply #90 |
99. A low-cost DU workaround: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 07:51 PM Response to Reply #99 |
116. not bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaganPreacher
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:28 AM Response to Reply #116 |
122. You're asking the wrong question, Counselor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 07:37 AM Response to Reply #122 |
124. but we might lie about the answers people give us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
count_alucard
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
55. Kerry would concede again, faster even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:41 AM Response to Reply #55 |
66. Thank you for not letting another thread go by without a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NationalEnquirer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 12:26 PM Response to Reply #55 |
71. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
count_alucard
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 12:27 AM Response to Reply #71 |
102. Karl Rove should hire you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Earth
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 12:35 PM Response to Reply #55 |
73. why are ALL your posts about Kerry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
count_alucard
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 12:33 AM Response to Reply #73 |
103. and do you have to defend this impostor in every single one of your posts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anaxarchos
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
57. So..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:42 AM Response to Reply #57 |
67. I agree. Realistic impact would be virtually nil, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anaxarchos
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 05:40 PM Response to Reply #67 |
85. I don't want to be misunderstood on this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 07:23 PM Response to Reply #85 |
89. That's how I saw it and why I agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouvet_Island
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 03:54 PM Response to Reply #57 |
78. I´d just like to state that I disagree, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mistwell
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 04:02 PM Response to Reply #57 |
80. I disagree also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaulVB
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 04:54 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Your statement is a very, very shameful LIE (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anaxarchos
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 05:21 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. I suppose we could go through all this again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 08:43 PM Response to Reply #83 |
94. Amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouvet_Island
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 09:47 AM Response to Reply #83 |
110. All this have been answered for, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouvet_Island
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 05:52 PM Response to Reply #80 |
86. I of course disagree with this too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anaxarchos
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 06:13 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. You do not disgaree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouvet_Island
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 09:49 AM Response to Reply #87 |
111. Eh, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 08:28 PM Response to Reply #80 |
92. So re exit poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
68. If anyone wants to do the design and management of the project.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaulVB
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
79. Anybody thinking on this seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 08:48 PM Response to Reply #79 |
95. We are the we we have been waiting for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-05 08:54 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Ok - so if you want to do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 08:15 PM Response to Reply #97 |
117. Is Zogby the answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
googly
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 02:34 AM Response to Original message |
105. Waste of time, has no constitutional validity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouvet_Island
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 09:52 AM Response to Reply #105 |
112. False, true, false. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lynne
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 04:05 PM Response to Reply #105 |
115. Have to agree - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kashka-Kat
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 11:24 PM Response to Reply #105 |
118. oops posted in wrong spot try again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
109. We already know they cheated so why do we need further confirmation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouvet_Island
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 09:53 AM Response to Reply #109 |
113. To communicate this to the rest of the population. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 02:52 PM Response to Reply #113 |
114. I'm for that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kashka-Kat
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
119. Huh? Lacks credibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockStar
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 02:13 AM Response to Reply #119 |
128. I suppose you have credible evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kashka-Kat
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 12:57 AM Response to Reply #128 |
129. evidence of what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharman
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 01:46 AM Response to Original message |
127. Better yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC