|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 09:00 PM Original message |
About "personal recounts" in Ohio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shalom
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. Keep the Heat On: Make the Impossible Possible !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. in light of the newest information about Clermont County I doubt that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-05 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. can't they charge whatever they want? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 12:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I remember hearing accounts of people (BBV?) being changed a dollar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 01:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. In Florida, the rate for the "personal" recount was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lala_rawraw
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 03:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. What you can do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 03:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. You are slamming into an open door |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 06:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. You got a DUer to provide you with information on one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:01 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. I forwarded your post to that poster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:16 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. I recognize that litigation is pending |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:18 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. You're claiming that in some counties in Ohio it is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:30 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. You won't check anything, just like you didn't check this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:51 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. You can keep saying that "the ball is in my court" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 09:03 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. It's been proven |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
48. The time for recounts is past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 12:11 AM Response to Reply #48 |
54. Which BOE is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 08:36 PM Response to Reply #54 |
67. According to Attorney General of Ohio - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 09:13 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Okay, you and I have had this discussion before, but maybe if I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 09:17 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Did you try getting ANY BOE in Ohio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 09:38 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. They DID THWART THE OFFICIAL RECOUNT EFFORTS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 09:45 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Once again - the "official recount" has no bearing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 09:57 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Given that the Ohio federal litigation deals specifically with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 10:03 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. No he cannot - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 10:10 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. Guess you know nothing about legal actions, do you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 10:21 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. No he wouldn't face any "wrath" - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 10:29 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. I am not making up anything and AG's opinions are legal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 10:32 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Fact remains, the AG advised SOS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 10:44 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Not my imagination at all. Just like the recount efforts that were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 11:11 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Ah I see - so you have absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 11:31 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Reality is the litigation is pending... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lala_rawraw
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:32 PM Response to Reply #7 |
49. They are? For each county? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:39 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. See port #48. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. you didn't read my post very well - I did not say it couldn't be done, I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:39 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. You (and others) keep pointing to the Greens' recount - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 05:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. ok -- I get your point. you like buses? trains? come to Ohio via Transit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 05:26 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. I already told you - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 05:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I suppose Transit makes you sic... I would not presume to know what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 06:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. "A few anomalies" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 06:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. my precinct didn't have problems -- it was a * "area" and went |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:16 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. Once again, and with feeling - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sepia_steel
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 02:59 AM Response to Reply #13 |
61. If you don't believe fraud happened, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lala_rawraw
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
50. Can we get Clermont... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:40 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. hey, lala_rawraw.... what happened in Butler? I'm in Butler and I got |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
minvis
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 11:43 PM Response to Reply #52 |
108. I've got Butler County information regarding voting machines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 11:59 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. hey minvis... I'm heading to sleep -- got a nasty cold. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
minvis
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 12:16 AM Response to Reply #109 |
110. I'll contact you tomorrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmac
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 07:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. do you have to be an Ohio state resident to make this request? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
45. THere were a lot of things they "had to do by law" that they didn't do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:22 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. First of all, as the Ohioan DUer that I quoted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
44. Nevada. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
43. It was NV that was asking an outrageous amount and I think also NM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zeebo
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
8. Thanks for keeping this idea out there, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 04:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. No, you're not missing anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 06:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Wrong. Its an issue of time, money and resources. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 07:32 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Thanks for your efforts to date Ida, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 11:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
46. Thank you Merh...the lightbulb just went off in my head. Now I know what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BethFromIL
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 07:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Fraud or Not Fraud??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kster
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 07:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Get something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BethFromIL
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 07:58 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. I'm serious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kster
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 02:28 AM Response to Reply #23 |
60. Depends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmac
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:06 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Me too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waz_nc
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:20 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. I'll donate too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:04 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. First of all, I have to commend you on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sepia_steel
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 03:02 AM Response to Reply #26 |
62. YOU'RE NOT DOING ANYTHING TO PROVE IT EITHER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 09:49 AM Response to Reply #26 |
83. You can read my (public) report on the situation at --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 10:23 AM Response to Reply #83 |
84. I am sorry - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 02:44 PM Response to Reply #84 |
88. Uh, no. The discrepancies occurred in only SELECT precincts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 03:12 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Ok - I don't understand, please explain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdaBriggs
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 06:53 PM Response to Reply #89 |
104. I would be happy to talk with you about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmac
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
25. My God! Have you not read anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:06 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. You will note that I said I do not believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waz_nc
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:55 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. I don't think it's a question of belief. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
livvy
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
33. All I can say is your taunts drive me nuts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:53 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. This is not a taunt - this is information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zan_of_Texas
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 12:01 AM Response to Reply #36 |
53. hey q -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaulVB
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 08:54 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Option # 2 (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BethFromIL
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 09:17 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Talk the talk , but not Walk the Walk , |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 09:40 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. I agree... if money was there for the charges for the BOEs and the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Earth
![]() |
Sat Jan-29-05 10:05 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. we are all OOZING with money in our pockets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berniew1
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
55. The vote process is public & records are public info; you can see info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berniew1
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
56. Green recount volunteers summaries of Green recount by county- problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharman
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 01:31 AM Response to Original message |
57. Better yet, canvass suspicious precincts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 01:39 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Some work has been done along these lines. I suspect it will take a few |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharman
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 12:29 AM Response to Reply #58 |
81. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 12:42 AM Response to Reply #81 |
82. I helped canvess one day in December with Pacifica Radio. I just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kster
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 02:13 AM Response to Original message |
59. I don't get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 03:42 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. So far we see (from the Ohioan that posted it) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 05:32 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. That's not entirely accurate. She was told people could view them, not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpaceBuddy008
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 05:45 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. grassroots meeting held in Ohio w/BBvoting.org! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Sun Jan-30-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. If you can view them, you can recount them - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
85. Doesn't it seem a little ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 12:38 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. No, when you go and do a "personal" recount |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 02:42 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. Touching them or not.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 03:14 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. There is a time-limit on the availability of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 04:08 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. Feel free to poke... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 05:40 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. The 2001 MSM recount result had Gore winning - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 06:10 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. No proof of fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 06:15 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. If you recount a county, and find that Kerry's votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Earth
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 06:19 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. did you get what you came for yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 06:24 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. Didn't know you were appointed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Earth
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 06:27 PM Response to Reply #97 |
99. i'm obviously NOT the only one who has told you this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 06:32 PM Response to Reply #99 |
101. So what - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Earth
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 06:33 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. good idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 06:24 PM Response to Reply #95 |
98. My point exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 06:28 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. No, 18 votes discrepancy is very easily ignored. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 06:35 PM Response to Reply #100 |
103. Not sure why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 07:07 PM Response to Reply #103 |
105. I thought it would be obvious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 07:33 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. Who will get interested... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 09:22 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. securing election materials is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 12:41 AM Response to Reply #107 |
111. JUSTICE is prosecuting the criminals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 12:53 AM Response to Reply #111 |
112. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Earth
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 01:05 AM Response to Reply #111 |
113. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 08:45 AM Response to Reply #107 |
114. Considering the right to.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 09:55 AM Response to Reply #114 |
115. The MSM recount in 2001 - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 11:14 AM Response to Reply #115 |
116. Since the whole recount's results... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 12:56 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. What in the world are you talking about - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 01:11 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. That's what I thought, till I read your link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 01:30 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. What makes you think that the MSM recount |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 01:46 PM Response to Reply #119 |
120. Let's try this again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 01:49 PM Response to Reply #120 |
121. You are misunderstanding what "never undertaken" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 02:03 PM Response to Reply #121 |
122. Still trying to figure out where we are mis connecting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 02:11 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. mea culpa - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer
![]() |
Tue Feb-01-05 04:45 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. The official recount in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Mon Jan-31-05 04:09 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter
![]() |
Wed Feb-02-05 02:38 PM Response to Reply #86 |
126. A small piece of the pie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Feb-02-05 02:46 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. First of all, the letter that I gave |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter
![]() |
Wed Feb-02-05 03:13 PM Response to Reply #127 |
128. You do support prosecution of violations of election law?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Feb-02-05 03:25 PM Response to Reply #128 |
129. You're either having reading comprehension problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter
![]() |
Wed Feb-02-05 03:49 PM Response to Reply #129 |
130. Ballots are not the same as poll books. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Feb-02-05 04:06 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. "Canvass of election returns" includes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter
![]() |
Wed Feb-02-05 04:24 PM Response to Reply #131 |
132. Bullshit. The excerpt references length of time they must be preserved, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Feb-02-05 04:33 PM Response to Reply #132 |
133. If you don't think that vote-counting fraud has occurred, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mgr
![]() |
Wed Feb-02-05 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
125. Too simplistic a world view |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC