The HL
(492 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-10-06 01:48 PM
Original message |
| Dems Refuse to Mention Diebold, So its President Jeb in '08 |
|
Are the Dems secretly in bed with The Bush's, they must be because they refuse to even mention Diebold/ESS let alone try to do anything about it. They need to get off thier asses. http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com
|
tatertop
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-10-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Perhaps the Dems think Jeb/Newt in '08 would be darn good for America |
|
Follow Occam's Razor and what do you get? Maybe the Democrats think it's time to officially endorse one-party rule in this country?
|
TechBear_Seattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-10-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. Meaning that the Dems hate America? |
|
While I am certainly no fan of the DLC and other presumed leaders of the party, even I wouldn't go that far.
As for the OP's question, I have no idea. Election fraud issues and the Democrats' refusal to say anything about them, is one of the reasons I'm no fan.
|
tatertop
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-10-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Our refusal to address this issue will hand the election to the pukes |
|
We will never recover if we let them steal '06 and '08. Never.
|
shance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-10-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. No doubt of course some Dems (DLC) are in bed with the Republicans. |
|
They've been infiltrating our party for years.
People need to wake up.
|
kster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-10-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message |
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-10-06 11:19 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. Well, what about getting offa our own? Who is your Sec of State? |
|
Who sits on your county election board?
Don't wait for anyone to lead -- you have been volunteered. :)
HL, we need you to help us dump McPherson. And we need to get Debra Bowen in because she IS leading on this one.
Let's get busy. Debra, for example, needs press and dough.
|
Stevepol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 04:27 AM
Response to Original message |
| 7. It would only take one high-profile Dem speaking unambiguously |
|
to bring about miracles in getting rid of Diebold or at least in making it more difficult for them and their many cohorts now, ES&S, Sequoia, etc. to steal the next election.
IMO, but I hope I'm wrong, there's no way to salvage this election since almost nobody of high profile has come out strongly against the voting machines. It's hard to see why anymore. They could quote any of the voluminous statistical and anecdotal material proving fraud. They've got lawsuits all over the country, voting discrepancies, insider information, everything you would need to make a really big stink.
I felt the same way in 04. I felt strongly the election wd be stolen because of the voting machines, but I hoped that the majority would be large enough that it wouldn't be possible to hide it (and actually Kerry's win WAS large enough that it wasn't possible to hide it, as the exit polls showed) and that Kerry with his army of lawyers wd somehow sneak out a victory.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 12th 2026, 02:51 PM
Response to Original message |