|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports |
![]() |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 12:59 PM Original message |
Baseball Commissioner, Bud Selig, must overrule bad umpire call that wiped out perfect game |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. Lupica at NYDailyNews says the same thing. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestRick
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
2. I hope Selig changes the ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. He has the power to do that and I believe all baseball fans would agree with changing the bad call. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
76. If Selig has to make a decision... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
3. it'll never happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Papa Boule
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
65. Be great if it did, though. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MicaelS
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
4. Instant. Replay. NOW!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. That's not what it's all about and you should understand that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MicaelS
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I'm completely serious.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. But that's a seperate issue and not relevant to this one specific, unique incident. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
28. "get serious..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:44 PM Response to Reply #28 |
79. yep, do it like football |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. I agree 100000% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City of Mills
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
6. Can't happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chisox08
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Integrity of baseball? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbdo2007
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
40. The "integrity of baseball" is ruined more by bad calls than by overturned calls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
7. Nope...part of the game...and it will open the floodgates... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Because every bad call robbed a pitcher of a perfact game on the last out of the ninth inning? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:15 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. World Series have been decided... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. ..in the bottom of the ninth one out away from a perfect game... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. You've been listening to Republicans too long... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. You said World Series have been decided by bad calls like this..I asked you to back it up.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. I didn't say "like this" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:32 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Were they at the end of a perfect game with one out left? No? Then they're not the same, are they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:34 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Don Denkinger admitted his call in game 6 was blown... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:38 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. The precedent is correcting an erroneous call in a perfect game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:40 PM Original message |
Game 6 1985... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
48. Not the same scenario..ergo the "precedent" you are so worried about wouldn't apply.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:44 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. So you don't care about a bad call in that situation...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:46 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:47 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. So it is more important for the pitcher to have that stat on his books... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:53 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. Apples and oranges.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:40 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Game 6 1985... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
69. no way - it would set a horrible precedent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. That absolute 100% pure bull shit and I think you know that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Where did I say that there have been more cases of a perfect game being ruined... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:17 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Wanna bet on that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
80. Sure... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. So that means you're against Selig overruling the bad umpire call because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:25 PM Response to Reply #26 |
33. It sets a bad precedent... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:34 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. It would only set a precedent if there was another situation like this in another perfect game... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:39 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Uh no... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:40 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Uh, yes...The precedent is correcting a blatantly obvious bad call.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:43 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Sorry...no.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:35 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. You mean it could happen a lot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:45 PM Response to Reply #39 |
52. The logical outcome of a decision to retroactively change the record book... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:40 PM Response to Reply #33 |
44. What one may see as a bad precedent... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Bad calls have cost teams the World Series |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
73. Would it matter if it were the first batter who was improperly called safe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. Show me where in the rule book it says that bad calls are part of the game |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
62. Bad calls ARE a part of the game because we have human players and human umpires. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:03 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. No, wrong... That doesn't mean we have to continue doing it that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. yes, it IS part of the game. Since there is no provision for changing calls, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:31 PM Response to Reply #68 |
74. OK, so as you admit.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 03:18 PM Response to Reply #74 |
87. Indeed - I never said that bad calls MUST continue to be part of the game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #23 |
71. they are a part of the game - that does not mean they are a "rule" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbdo2007
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
41. Rules are more a "part of the game" than bad calls are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99
![]() |
Sat Jun-05-10 02:37 AM Response to Reply #7 |
94. I remember when those flood gates opened up after the Brett's pine-tar home run... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy Vixen
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. I changed my opinion on Jim Joyce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
9. Not possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis-t
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
29. Hey, that's right. If over-turned, 28th batter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:51 PM Response to Reply #29 |
57. And the defensive player... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:10 PM Response to Reply #29 |
67. And I don't think the batter or pitcher would object to that! So what's the problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coyote_Bandit
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. The Commissioner needs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. And I would add pressure from baseball fans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
25. Who gives a rat's ass? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:25 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Pitching a perfect game is the ultimate pitcher accomplishment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:28 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Because it has no significance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:42 PM Response to Reply #34 |
49. Clearly sports have no significance in your life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 03:01 PM Response to Reply #49 |
83. Hey, I have a life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot
![]() |
Fri Jun-04-10 10:50 PM Response to Reply #25 |
92. My fellow Michigander |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
31. It's pointless. If Selig overrules the call, Galarraga's "perfect" game will still have an asterisk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #31 |
55. Why would it? I won't put an asterisk by it. Will you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:54 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. It will be an administratively created perfect game. I don't even think the pitcher... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #61 |
70. No. The pitcher in fact pitched a perfect game. A ruling by Selig would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seneca
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
47. Baseball is like life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:52 PM Response to Reply #47 |
58. It's not a "do-over". It's correcting an obvious mistake that is easily correctible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seneca
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 04:41 PM Response to Reply #58 |
90. There's no crying in baseball! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
56. I saw this on the AM news and cursed out loud. I hope the ump's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
59. I say No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ernesto
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
63. Show some balls Bud! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
road2000
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
66. Selig COULD pull a SCOTUS... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shrek
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
72. MSNBC: Selig won’t overturn call that cost perfect game |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:43 PM Response to Reply #72 |
77. Milt Pappas just called Selig "gutless". Keith Oberman doesn't like the decision either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Are_grits_groceries
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
75. There was a precedent set in 1991 when 50 no-hitters were thrown out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackDragna
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:43 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. You make a good point.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Are_grits_groceries
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:51 PM Response to Reply #78 |
81. They changed the rule and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackDragna
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 02:57 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. I think that'd be nuts.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Are_grits_groceries
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 03:05 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. As I said I'm torn about changing it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackDragna
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 03:08 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Heh. I love the DH. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Are_grits_groceries
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 03:18 PM Response to Reply #85 |
88. Either do it in both leagues or don't do it at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dajoki
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
86. I don't think the call could or should be changed n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mudoria
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
89. Leave the call as it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Jun-03-10 06:44 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. Deleted message |
Onceuponalife
![]() |
Sat Jun-05-10 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
93. Nothing to see here. Time to move along. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC