|
Edited on Sun Nov-21-04 09:38 PM by belle
Some people don't like/fear/attack gay folk 'cause it's the fashion and it gives them an acceptable outlet for their bottled-up icky feelings. It's the "kick the dog" transaction, wherein essentially powerless people get tromped on all day by their boss; they can't fight the boss, so they go home and take it out on the wife, who in turn takes it out on the kids, who then go kick the dog. These are the people who would've been the most enthusiastic racists in Jim Crow South, for instance. Some may be that, as well. But for a lot of these people, especially younger ones, they've already had it sufficiently drummed into their heads that "racism isn't cool" that they don't think along those lines. Still, someone needs to fill the scapegoat role; and right now, tag, gays are it for a lot of folks.
The anti-gay-marriage and "special rights" folks, especially, have a lot of these people among their ranks; they're operating from the incoherent belief that somehow, gays and other minorities are getting something that they're not, and it isn't FAIR, dammit. Some of these people aren't even really "haters" so much as generally angry, bitter, and confused; they probably wouldn't care much if they were in a better place themselves, but it feels to them like the world is crumbling around their ears and they're just not in any mood to hear about univeral love and tolerance and so on.
Some people are, indeed, having the classic "reaction formation" as well, attacking what they secretly long for. These are the ones who focus most obsessively about the sex, sex, sex, and how disgusting it all is, every single lurid detail. Also, I agree with the poster who said that most of these people are sexually repressed in general. You can tell, of course, what a given anti-sex/gay bigot's jones is by what he or she fixates on most obsessively, from anal sex to prostitution.
A *lot* of people hate gay men in particular because they associate gayness with being effeminate, which they associate with being weak and vulnerable, which terrifies them, because they don't want to be it. These are the ones who are more upset about the gender implications of gayness than anti-sex, per se, although somewhere in there there are erotic hangups as well, of course. Needless to say, the overwhelming majority of this type consists of men, and some very male-ID'd straight women (the Ann Coulter type).
Some people are professional politicians or wanna-be's (this includes religious organization leaders), and are using their "hate" primarily as a cynical ploy to gain status. These are the people who don't seem to ever get angry, or have much of any emotional response at all, really; and they don't seem to ever hear what you're saying to them, either. They just smoothly and politely repeat their talking points. There is no point in attempting to genuinely connect with these people, as they have no intention of engaging honestly. More to the point, they are probably so disconnected from their own feelings that they've turned themselves into a kind of willing cog in some political machine.
Finally, you have the genuine haters, the Fred Phelpses of this world. These people are actually a very small percentage of the people we're talking about when we say "homophobe." Honestly, I think they belong in a category to themselves. Whatever's wrong with Phelps, it goes far beyond anything to do with sexuality, although of course that's a part of it; the whole personality is just completely distorted with rage and hatred. Ultimately, I think that the target doesn't even matter; what matters is having a valve for their toxic destructiveness. Phelps may have picked gay folk for some personal kink in his psyche, but ultimately I think he just reached out for whoever was most socially vulnerable, in much the same way that Hitler targetted Jews. And it's never enough for them. They are bottomless wells of hate. Avoid, avoid, avoid.
|