struggle4progress
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-21-09 07:40 PM
Original message |
| Fast Flash Drive Recommendations? |
|
I sometimes need to move stuff back and forth between home and work
Tried this yesterday with about 3.5 GB of data on a 4 GB flash. Writing at home took about 15 min. Got to work and set out to copy the files onto my work HD. The estimated time for the read/copy was about 4 hours. Ouch!
|
RoyGBiv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-21-09 08:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
That may not be a problem with the flash drive. Could either be the port being a USB 1.1 standard or a slow hard drive or some variation of that.
The systems where I work virus scan every file that is accessed on a flash stick. Could that be the issue?
|
struggle4progress
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-21-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. USB standard might be the issue: it's an older machine. Virus scan probably isn't the issue: |
|
the virus scan occurs on mount; for obvious reasons, I didn't cancel it but waited until it completed before attempting the file copy
|
hobbit709
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-22-09 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Sounds about right. USB 1.1 is slow |
|
I've always been able to read a flash drive much faster than writing to one.
|
IDemo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-22-09 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. Writes will always take longer on flash memory regardless of the IO |
|
Flash writes are initiated by first 'erasing' the memory block(s) by writing 1's. The data is then written by filling in the 0's where needed. A SATA based device will give you much quicker bus speeds than USB 2.0, but the actual memory write speed will remain the same. http://www.techchee.com/2008/12/09/ocz-throttle-e-sata-flash-drive-triples-the-speed-of-usb-flash-drives/
|
hobbit709
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-22-09 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. I use an 8GB Throttle as the boot drive |
|
on my 8-track Digital Audio Recorder setup. Writing/installing took almost as long as writing to USB, but reading is quick. The box goes from POST to desktop in 10 seconds. Made a 5Gb partition on a 40Gb notebook hard drive to hold the swap file and use the other 30+Gb for writing the recording data.
Mini Itx case with Atom 330 motherboard, 1Gb RAM, M-Audio Delta 1010LT audio card. I use a USB external DVD-RW with it. Complete audio recording setup I can carry around in a shopping bag.
|
pokerfan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-23-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. USB 1.1 was one of the reasons I decided that it was time to upgrade |
|
That and moving to SATA.
Transferring 250 GB of data from the old machine to the new machine was no picnic.
|
hobbit709
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-24-09 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. If I have to copy that much data |
|
I just take the old drive out of the old box, plug it into the new one as a secondary drive and let her rip. Then you can always put it back in the old box when done.
|
pokerfan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-24-09 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 8. and normally I would have done exactly that |
|
as I've done so many times in the past. But my old machine was EIDE and the new machine is SATA. So instead of plonking down $20 for an adapter that I would likely only use once, I suffered through the slowwww transfer to an external drive.
|
hobbit709
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-24-09 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. all the newer motherboards I've seen still have one IDE controller on them. |
pokerfan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-24-09 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Feb 23rd 2026, 08:11 AM
Response to Original message |