truedelphi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-07-08 03:10 PM
Original message |
| Here is a peek into the past lives of the candidates |
Sanity Claws
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-07-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Not hard to figure out who he is referring to |
|
even though he fails to use a single name. Whether we agree with his characterization is another question.
|
Grateful for Hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-07-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
that genuine communications from "others" are never political. In this case, the communication does not feel genuine to me. Instead, I would have had more confidence in it if there had been either a reminder to strive to manifest that which is for the greatest good of the US, or, if it had been a general discussion about the issues that currently affect our planet.
|
LaurenG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-07-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. I can say that this is how I see both of them |
|
I have not been discussing politics in this space as I think it brings a negativity here that we don't need. However, I am certain that nothing is certain about the democratic nominee this time.
I only ask that those who are predicting try very hard not to get caught up in their own wishes. Since I am sincerely hoping for one of the two to win I'll say no more as I may be the most biased of all. Suffice it to say we may see some dramatic changes, but whatever happens it is the collective will that will decide.
Thank you for the link. :hi:
|
truedelphi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-07-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. this discussion abt stuff political was first offered through Seth |
|
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 08:38 PM by truedelphi
almost two years ago. It was in very broad terms and did not focus on any of the individuals that are now in this particular, three person discussion.
In fact, Seth first offered as a very broad discussion the fact that "Visionaries" were going to become involved in the political process. Abt six weeks later, Cindy Sheehan arrived on the scene. (Late July 2006) He also indicated that those of us who were involved in election and voting reform were among those visionaries.
And Seth has become immensely fond of Dennis Kucinich. He feels that Dennis will keep control of his seat and will continue to be of vast improtance inside the House of representatives.
|
LaurenG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-08-08 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 8. I am very fond of Dennis Kucinich myself |
|
Thanks again for the link. :)
|
truedelphi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-08-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
PinkTiger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-07-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Something funny about that site |
|
The date on the first letter was in 2006; then it goes to April 2008. It felt contrived and not genuine. Sorry.
|
truedelphi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-07-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. The dating of "2006" was a typo - should have read "2008" n/t |
Celebration
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-07-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. I know very little about all this |
|
I guess one has to experience this before totally buying it.
How many people channel Seth? LOL, I never made it through that Jane Roberts (??) book long ago.
Maybe Seth should come back and run for office.
|
BuelahWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-08-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. This is very interesting indeed |
|
I had heard many years ago that there were various people channeling Seth after Jane Roberts died. I hadn't really read any of their stuff though.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 10th 2026, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message |