And there are only a handful of practices that are obligatory (Mass on Sunday, Confession once a year, etc.).
The rest is political and social.
On paper, the role of the priest is not above all others but rather is that of a servant to the laity and the Church.
"The priesthood is not an institution that exists "alongside" the laity or "above" it. The priesthood of bishops and priests, as well as the ministry of deacons, is "for" the laity, and precisely for this reason it possesses a "ministerial" character, that is to say one "of service"’. Moreover, it highlights the ‘baptismal priesthood", the priesthood common to all the faithful. It highlights this priesthood and at the same ‘time helps it to be realized in the sacramental life."
http://www.clerus.org/clerus/dati/2000-10/10-999999/l90.htmlReserving ordination to males is pretty well settled now, although it's still a hair shy of infallible teaching.
As far as the Latin Mass is concerned, the more I see of it on EWTN and other places, the more I see how essential Vatican II was. The murmuring of prayers in Latin that no one can hear reminds me more of Snape performing an incantation during the Quidditch match than an ethereal experience.
The SSPX, not to mention the SSPV, are just plain insane reactionaries. To look at the history of the Catholic Church and to state that it ended with the 1962 Missal is insanity. They have staked out a dominant role on the fringe but it remains the fringe.
I'm curious to to see how the investigation ("apostolic visitation") of the nuns turns out. I agree with you. Its purpose seems motivated by a search for dissent.
There is a right wing wave sweeping over the Church. But it is a wave of conservatism, and all that that means, but it is not a wave of Catholicism. Once again the Church is being held up for political purposes.