Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Hillary Memo: Lay Off Jeremiah Wright"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Hillary Clinton Supporters Group Donate to DU
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:37 PM
Original message
"Hillary Memo: Lay Off Jeremiah Wright"
Looks like she is taking the high
road on this issue, not adding any
negatives but, still letting Obama
swing in the wing.

Clinton campaign: Yes on Rezko, no on Wright
by James Oliphant

The memo has apparently gone around the Hillary Clinton camp this morning: Lay off the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr.

On a conference call Saturday to talk about the state of the race, Clinton campaign officials just wouldn’t go there.

“That’s really for Senator Obama to address,” said chief strategist Mark Penn.

It’s interesting, because certainly, the Clinton folks have shown very little reluctance to knock Obama around like a pinata every time they come across as what they perceive to be a vulnerable spot.

Take, for instance, Obama’s mea culpa on his dealings with Antoin “Tony” Rezko. The Clinton campaign has been calling on Obama for months to come clean about the full extent of his relationship with the indicted developer. Friday, they got their wish to some degree, but that only racheted up the Clinton attacks.

Penn said Obama’s disclosures were part of a “troubling pattern,” in which Obama’s words don’t match the facts. He said Obama’s advisers on foreign policy and trade haven’t always been on the same page as the candidate. And with Rezko, Penn said, Obama waited too long to tell the full story. The theme, as the Clinton folks have been pushing for weeks, is that Obama’s words don’t add up to very much.

“We tend to learn more in dribs and drabs rather than the kind of transparent candidate and the transparent campaign he says he has been running,” Penn said.

Transparency, of course, is a two-way street. The campaign was asked again whether it would release Clinton’s tax returns, something Obama has been demanding for months. Penn said the returns would be released “around April 15.” When pressed, he pledged they would be made public before the Pennsylvania primary. The Obama camp has been saying returns will shed light on the various sources of income for both Hillary — and especially Bill — Clinton.

Clinton spokesman Phil Singer also wondered why Obama had said he wasn’t aware of Rezko’s legal problems when Friday Obama said that he had indeed read stories about Rezko’s troubles and why Obama said Rezko had raised $100,000 less for his campaign than the developer actually raised.

“Senator Obama needs to answer some basic questions, including why does this story keep changing?” Singer said. He complained that Obama “claims the high ground while attacking Senator Clinton’s character.”

As for staying away from Rev. Wright, it may be that the campaign didn’t want to invite comparisons to Geraldine Ferraro, whose race-based remarks were made seemingly a thousand news cycles ago. Or maybe that talking about race in any context has become such a landmine that they just thought it wouldn’t be prudent.

It certainly wasn’t because there was nothing to say.

http://politicalnighttrain.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/hillary-memo-lay-off-jeremiah-wright/



Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's smart. Can't wait the BO people to enlighten us how this is proof she's evil
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They are a lost cause.
If they cannot argue on the
issues they start with the
right-wing smear attacks on
Hillary. Most of them are not
even worth wasting the time and
effort on to enlighten them.

Obama is gonna have lower approval
ratings than W if he wins the nomination
and the GE, because he will not be able
to give his supporters the change they
expect. Things cannot and will not
happen overnight if any major change
is accomplished. Government bureaucracy
moves in wee baby steps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. TAXES! TAXES! TAXES! TAXES! TAXES! TAXES! TAXES!
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 02:57 PM by anamandujano
The overwhelming hypocrisy of equating Ferraro's TRUE comment with Wright and his 20 year relationship with Bama is disgusting.

It has been their strategy all along for them to be able to say whatever they wanted and muzzle the Clinton campaign by taking any word or phrase they desired and making a racial issue out of it.

Take for instance the quip Obama made about Bill Clinton and dancing; when he was asked about Bill being the first black pres he said, "I'd have to see him dance first."

Imagine what would have happened if Bill said "I'm really not that good of a dancer."

Needless to say, the MSM backed them up every step of the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sure makes sense to me.

Besides, she simply doesn't need to say more at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Smart move, I agree.
Let Obama twist in the wind.
The Wright story is out there
and being spread far and wide
and he cannot blame it on her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Absolutely!
If they ask her in the debates she should just ask them why they are asking her that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. "It certainly wasn’t because there was nothing to say."--but a real SMACK from politicol!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. so---wait till this gets posted out there!! if we mention wright at all.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. I just posted this in GD-P - because of the accusations to the contrary
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 28th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Hillary Clinton Supporters Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC