|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:16 PM Original message |
Drinking habits of rape accuser raised at Naval Academy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. *sigh* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Grrrr! Of course they have to smear her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. his defense is that he didn't rape her, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. oh yes, i know... get that ladies? if you drink and flirt... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:56 PM Response to Reply #7 |
74. Apparently rape only really happens to women who don't drink! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. and yet, it does seem to be tied into his defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. excuse my french, but BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 02:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Is having sex with an intoxicated MAN "rape"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. yeah, i would say so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
44. wait a minute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:01 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. is he charging her with rape? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:10 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. what do you mean it can't be used against men? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:14 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. i object to them using her history of being sexually agressive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:26 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. but intoxication is relevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:46 PM Response to Reply #56 |
70. i give up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 11:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
98. Neither of us know the merits of this case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. I am a man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 05:16 PM Response to Reply #30 |
76. Thank you very, very much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taught_me_patience
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 06:58 PM Response to Reply #30 |
85. Not the issue at hand... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lukasahero
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 07:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
87. Your subject line says it all "I am a man" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 07:19 PM Response to Reply #30 |
91. Thanks for being a human being, who also happens to be a man! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 11:30 PM Response to Reply #30 |
97. We're not talking about forced sex. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
34. Was he drunk too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:49 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Why did she stick something inside of his body while he was passed out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:58 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. If that's all it means to you, ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:49 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. why would she be charged if he were drunk also? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:56 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Suppose they were both drunk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:29 PM Response to Reply #40 |
59. I see what you're saying but look at it this way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 07:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
92. *sigh* indeed! Who knew, 40 years ago, we'd still be fighting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lukasahero
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. Is this supposed to surprise us any more? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Unfortunately, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
6. Some days I just wanna smack the ever loving shit out of some people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:38 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. good point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I thought I'd pre-empt that strawman. Someone will come along |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
54. tell me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:34 PM Original message |
Doesn't matter if she was turning tricks on the parkway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
65. that's not the point at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:47 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. No, her drinking doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:34 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. duplicate/delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:41 PM Response to Reply #54 |
64. No, it's just the opposite. It's evidence that she probably was attacked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:44 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. then it's a bad defense move |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 05:10 PM Response to Reply #68 |
75. well, if she doesn't remember then that should be evidence enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
8. Stopped When She Passed Out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. It's a nice PR statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
13. Because it's OK to rape drunk people? - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
China_cat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Only if they're women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Oh, I get it now. Whew, I was worried for a minute there. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sgxnk
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 02:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. victims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 02:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I don't presume to find any guilt or innocense before the end of the trial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sgxnk
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 02:47 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. the method |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:39 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. I think were mostly in agreement. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. the problem is with the double standard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 05:19 PM Response to Reply #32 |
77. Bingo n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sgxnk
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 06:18 PM Response to Reply #32 |
82. i disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 06:43 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. That's incorrect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sgxnk
![]() |
Fri Jul-21-06 01:11 PM Response to Reply #83 |
100. I stand correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sgxnk
![]() |
Fri Jul-21-06 01:19 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. typo: I stand correctED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mugu
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 10:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
95. A well written voice of reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 02:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Since you're quoting me, though responding to a different post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sgxnk
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 02:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. see my other post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:00 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. There is a problem with your generalization. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sgxnk
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:15 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:23 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Not at all rediculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sgxnk
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:27 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. i am not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taught_me_patience
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 07:16 PM Response to Reply #27 |
90. sgxnk you are completely right on this issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sgxnk
![]() |
Fri Jul-21-06 10:40 AM Response to Reply #90 |
99. i appreciate that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 05:20 PM Response to Reply #23 |
78. You're completely right, ThomCat -- thanks! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:02 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I already read it.....changes absolutely nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
China_cat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
46. He's a cop. He's one of the biggest parts of the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sgxnk
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:35 PM Response to Reply #46 |
62. nice stereotype |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
China_cat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:46 PM Response to Reply #62 |
69. Established People Against Rape |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sgxnk
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:53 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. quite possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:32 PM Response to Reply #24 |
60. I am very aware of the history of rape prosecution ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
China_cat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
43. There is no other crime where the VICTIM'S |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:51 PM Response to Reply #15 |
38. Yes, if a woman has sex with a man... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
China_cat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:55 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. You missed my meaning completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:04 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. I guess I did miss your point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
China_cat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:11 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. I was saying that there would be a full out hue, cry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:15 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Right, in both cases... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
China_cat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:28 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. Please read what I said again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conflictgirl
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:22 PM Response to Reply #47 |
55. The man may be accused in that case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:29 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. But |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
China_cat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:43 PM Response to Reply #58 |
66. Not if he's on one of the sports teams it doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
31. So I can see from most replies that we are supposed to believe the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:43 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. no, you didn't read the replies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:46 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Yes I did. There is the explicit sentiment that her past activities should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 03:56 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. that's a criticism of the tactic being used by the defense n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:07 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. How so? If by "defense" you mean "legal defense as opposed to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:12 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. it is a defense based on the premise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:43 PM Response to Reply #51 |
67. All women (nuns, grandmothers, strippers, ....) seem to be vilified ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 05:24 PM Response to Reply #51 |
80. Bingo, and anyone who doesn't get it doesn't want to get it n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
China_cat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:40 PM Response to Reply #48 |
63. Ok, follow this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bliss_eternal
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 07:33 PM Response to Reply #63 |
93. Wouldn't it be interesting if robbery victims were asked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 05:23 PM Response to Reply #31 |
79. Nope, not what one person on this thread EVER said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 07:04 PM Response to Reply #31 |
88. So women who have active sex lives are not credible victims. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lukasahero
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 07:08 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Perfectly said and an outstanding analysis. Thank you. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
72. Her sex habits and drinking habits are not legitimate evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 05:44 PM Response to Reply #72 |
81. And yet, so few people agree with this very obvious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ismnotwasm
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 06:47 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. It's another disgusting example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 06:58 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. And why *this* one guy, if she wasn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nevernose
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 10:54 PM Response to Reply #72 |
96. Her HABITS are irrelevant; what she'd done that night is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh
![]() |
Thu Jul-20-06 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
94. Verdict is in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC