bobthedrummer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-29-05 01:42 PM
Original message |
| Poll question: Is impeachment of George W. Bush and/or Richard Cheney realistic |
bobthedrummer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-29-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Laws certainly have been broken by their administration |
|
it's a lot like a new form of fascism
|
robbedvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-29-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. No, but it must be advocated anyway - or else you concede their |
wakeme2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-29-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. IMHO a lot depends on IF we find out who they |
|
targeted for wiretaps without Court Order. IMHO I one was somebody like Kerry... Bush would be toast by his own party.
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-29-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. only if we win the house in 2006 |
DELUSIONAL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-29-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. If the real GOPs want to save their party it is. |
|
I don't think bushie is really a "conservative" -- nor does he have old fashioned republican values.
We do need a two party system -- but if the Nation survives bushie I see the GOP party dying out and the democratic party becoming the "conservative" party and real liberal party emerging.
|
RDANGELO
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-29-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If the Dems get control of the House or the Senate, and I think they will. They will be able to hold investigations and subpoena people. The problem that the Democrats have right now is that they don't have the power to get the information out. Once that it gets out there will be an overwhelming support for impeachment, and that is when it will happen.
|
Zambero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-29-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Impeachment is not an end result, and is vastly over-rated |
|
It's merely a process step -- a majority vote to indict on the part of the House of Representatives, no more and no less. And even if it were accomplished the Senate must follow up with a super-majority in order to remove the accused from office. Given that unlikely scenario, impeachment talk is little more than a feel-good exercise. If (as was the case with Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson), the Senate's verdict is not to convict, the acquitted even gains a certain vindication from surviving what could be characterized as a politically-motivated coup attempt at the hands of partisan idealogues.
|
bemildred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-29-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. Sure, but kicking ass in Congress is far more important. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Feb 25th 2026, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |