|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
|
| patrioticliberal
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:23 PM Original message |
| ALLEN RESPONDS TO KERRY FILIBUSTER THREAT |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LoZoccolo
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Cornered animal. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| janx
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. Yep. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WahooJunkie
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. dillweed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| janx
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 6. Wasn't this referred to previously as the "nuclear option"? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WahooJunkie
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 9. Yes. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rodeodance
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 10. yes, but some Repugs want it to be patriotic so they renamed it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bunkerbuster1
|
Fri Jan-27-06 03:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 21. Even though Repubs coined the term in the first place. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| janx
|
Fri Jan-27-06 03:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 22. But it isn't constitutional at all, is it? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| graywarrior
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. They're such cowboys, aren't they? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TayTay
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. Geez, Davos looks a lot like the Senate floor |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GetTheRightVote
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. I just left a message at his office in DC, boy are they smug, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| emulatorloo
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. This Bush-tool wastes the taxpayer's money by getting up every morning |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Blaukraut
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. and THAT thing is running in '08 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The_Casual_Observer
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. Allen is still a spoiled little boy in a ugly man's body. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| maxrandb
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:39 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 14. If his dad were not a football coach |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wtbymark
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. we'll make your day shithead |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nutmegger
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. You sick bastards shouldn't |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Freddie Stubbs
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. Both sides playing to their bases |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| blm
|
Fri Jan-27-06 03:06 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 24. Untrue. Kerry didn't want to be the lead on this - he was scheduled to be |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Freddie Stubbs
|
Fri Jan-27-06 03:24 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 26. Kerry knows that there aren't enough votes to sustain the filibuster |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| blm
|
Fri Jan-27-06 03:31 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 27. That's your opinion. The facts point otherwise. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Kierkegaard
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. Uh, right. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wtbymark
|
Fri Jan-27-06 03:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 23. you spelled your nicname wrong |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Kierkegaard
|
Fri Jan-27-06 03:18 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 25. I did? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| democrat_patriot
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Firstly, it ain't no threat fucktard. If they can they will. End of story |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Midlodemocrat
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. God, he is completely worthless. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| unkachuck
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. c'mon Senate Dems.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ScreamingMeemie
|
Fri Jan-27-06 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. I've coined a term for such talk. I call it Penis Talk. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| boston bean
|
Fri Jan-27-06 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. Salazar is taking a poll, call him now!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| many a good man
|
Fri Jan-27-06 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. Virginia, Virginia, Virginia! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Fri Jan-27-06 04:46 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 31. If it weren't for Sen.Warner Ollie would have the seat Allen has |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| many a good man
|
Fri Jan-27-06 04:54 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 34. Get another Senator Warner and maybe |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Fri Jan-27-06 04:55 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 35. Amen to that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underpants
|
Fri Jan-27-06 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. SWEET NECTAR OF LIBERTY |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| smartvoter
|
Fri Jan-27-06 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. Like it matters if they go nuclear. The net net is the same. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| newyawker99
|
Sat Jan-28-06 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
| 36. Pompous idiot!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jose Diablo
|
Sat Jan-28-06 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
| 37. My response to Sen. Allen would be |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Catchawave
|
Sat Jan-28-06 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
| 38. Yes, my Senator is an idiot and |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ticapnews
|
Sat Jan-28-06 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
| 39. long-distance phone charges? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Mar 03rd 2026, 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC