|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Karmadillo
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 10:53 AM Original message |
Hillary argued for impeachment of Nixon. "One wonders where she is now." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. She's in the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Are you saying no Senators said anything about Nixon or Clinton before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:28 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Be sure to trot out what they said.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. So she can't express an opinion? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Duh...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:36 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Apparently not, so explain basic civics to me. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:37 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. If impeachment happens, where will the trial take place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:42 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. I get that point, but it doesn't explain the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:44 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. So because Republicans behave like idiots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:49 AM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Off the top of my head, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:54 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. And what did they say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:56 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Get over it. Google news if you're that interested. You're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:58 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. If you're not going to produce what they say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. Aw, break my heart. And have a nice day. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:07 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. Yeah, he's one to complain about lack of links and sources |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:09 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. What a curmudgeon! Puts Andy Rooney to shame! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 05:04 PM Response to Reply #50 |
109. here's a few links you may wish to read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 08:12 PM Response to Reply #109 |
112. Oh good lord! I think you may be right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 08:27 PM Response to Reply #112 |
113. Oh, there is more than that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:45 AM Response to Reply #18 |
27. In the Senate, filled with people who already have opinions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:52 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Thanks, megan, and agree. How can someone NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:55 AM Response to Reply #27 |
37. who are nonetheless expected to behave properly.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. That's not entirely accurate- it is, by nature, a political process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:29 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. And it is proper for Senators to behave in an impartial manner.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:52 AM Response to Reply #13 |
32. According to what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:57 AM Response to Reply #32 |
39. So basically, you want an ass like Frist or Trent Lott.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:00 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Wha??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Been there, done that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
70. Just curious! Has Hillary called for an investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:29 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I guess there's one person we know who doesn't understand basic civics! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:38 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. So tell us, kenny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
53. Trying to save face by acting ignorant and belligerent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:11 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. To be fair...That is all he has. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:02 PM Response to Reply #53 |
80. So in other words, you got nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 02:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
76. There's a big difference between not bashing the Chimp in public.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leetrisck
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
2. I really don't think Hillary had much to do with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
3. I don't think the impeachment of Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:20 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Any impeachment of Bush would involve Impeachment of Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:47 AM Response to Reply #8 |
29. Presidential Succession Act of 1792 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
49. It assumes we take the majority in the House in '06. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:27 PM Response to Reply #49 |
59. Thats a very big assumption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:29 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Of course it's realistic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:33 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Democrats don't even trust Democrats. (hell just look at DU) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:40 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Sure...just give up then. Sorry, I like to think that Dems can learn and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:45 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. I haven't given up, I just fight the fights that can be won |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
5. Dispite the many tired excuses the 'Rah Rah Hillary' crew will give you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:18 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. But, but, but only Republicans can fight. It's one of those basic civics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:39 AM Response to Reply #7 |
22. Now I am apparently part of the 'Hate America' Crowd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:45 AM Response to Reply #22 |
28. You sure seem to.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:53 AM Response to Reply #28 |
35. If you say so Mr.Honesty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:59 AM Response to Reply #35 |
41. Gee, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:05 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. Actually the brackets on the site caused the dates to drop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:03 PM Response to Reply #48 |
81. And when we see the dates, we realize how bogus your post was.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:17 PM Response to Reply #81 |
89. When Mr.Honesty calls someone bogus, it really stings! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:31 AM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Yeah, there's a swell argument....NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:35 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. That is sooooooooo two months ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:39 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. What's changed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:09 PM Response to Reply #21 |
55. Other than YOUR position on the Center Dems? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:06 PM Response to Reply #55 |
84. Yeah, I found out how dishonest our "progressive purists" are.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 01:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
71. Funny, that's the same argument I always get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:05 PM Response to Reply #71 |
83. That IS rich.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IA_Seth
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 01:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
72. You make SO much sense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:08 PM Response to Reply #72 |
85. Yeah, I do.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:35 PM Response to Reply #85 |
95. As opposed to folks who USED to hate all dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:55 PM Response to Reply #95 |
102. Don't tell me you're going to drag out those tired old links AGAIN? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:57 PM Response to Reply #102 |
105. Are you looking in a mirror? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 04:05 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. Guess you never DO get tired of looking lame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 04:11 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. We won't be laughing with you. We'll be laughing at you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
79. You seem confused about a number of things in this thread.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:10 PM Response to Reply #79 |
86. I know where I stand...with Democrats like Hillary Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:36 PM Response to Reply #79 |
96. Oh, his position gets real confusing when using the search feature. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:39 AM Response to Reply #5 |
20. Are these post-impeachment statements by GOP senators? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:52 AM Response to Reply #20 |
34. Frist's remarks were after the verdict.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:14 PM Response to Reply #34 |
58. Then it's proper and fitting for Hillary to make a statement AFTER she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:04 PM Response to Reply #58 |
82. Yup.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
9. There's no reason to augment legitimate arguments with exaggerations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:43 AM Response to Reply #9 |
24. Good Post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainer
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
26. My congressman's reason for not pushing impeachment: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:00 PM Response to Reply #26 |
43. That's a B.S. excuse if ever I heard one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:04 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. No lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:08 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. It's especially at times like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:29 PM Response to Reply #51 |
60. Well, consider my situation: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:36 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. Yikes!!!! You really have no representation at all, either! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 01:24 PM Response to Reply #60 |
69. My heart bleeds for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 01:23 PM Response to Reply #51 |
68. I got one Senator who is good (Dayton) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IntravenousDemilo
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:52 PM Response to Reply #26 |
100. Your congressman should be told, in no uncertain terms, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
30. One wonders why such a good Democrat is the focus of a witch hunt by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
45. Amazing, isn't it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:08 PM Response to Reply #45 |
52. Hey Mr.Honesty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:11 PM Response to Reply #52 |
87. And that's why you didn't put a link up.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:20 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. I put up links to both Mr.Honesty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:24 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. You put up bogus quotes in serivce of a bogus argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:32 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. If you say so Mr.Honesty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:34 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. I got no enemies list.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:44 PM Response to Reply #94 |
98. Teeny Progressives, Progressive Purists, McCarthyites, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. Fits some here to a T--and they're both dishonest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:55 PM Response to Reply #99 |
103. Were you dishonest and pathetic when you jeered the DLC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 02:26 PM Response to Reply #45 |
73. It's unsettling when the article has to use her own positives against her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:01 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. It's a dishonest hatchet job.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:10 PM Response to Reply #30 |
56. I agree that there is often a negative attitude towards Hillary here, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 01:05 PM Response to Reply #56 |
67. Such as? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 02:47 PM Response to Reply #30 |
75. One wonders why such a "good Democrat" consistently sides with..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:12 PM Response to Reply #75 |
88. Hey, I'm proud to stand with Tom Vilsack and Hillary Clinton.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:37 PM Response to Reply #88 |
97. If you're proud to stand with neocon traitors who are killing this country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:54 PM Response to Reply #97 |
101. Go rant to somebody who gives a shit.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 05:03 PM Response to Reply #97 |
108. How exactly is Hillary a neocon traitor? Please inform us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 02:57 PM Response to Reply #30 |
77. The minute she states publicly that our presence in Iraq is both.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:22 PM Response to Reply #77 |
91. You must hate the US of A |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
64. I wonder too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkle
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
74. Don't you mean Senator Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 08:05 PM Response to Reply #74 |
111. No. I meant Hillary. Thanks for asking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tactical Progressive
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
104. The presumptive nominee for President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Dec-28-05 05:11 PM Response to Reply #104 |
110. Thank you for making perfect sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC