|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 12:10 AM Original message |
Poll question: Hillary Clinton as the Democratic Nominee in 2008? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
1. No way.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 12:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. As the OP I will maintain my carefully guarded facade of neutrality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 12:19 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Are they thong or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 12:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yeah, things are gettin' weird around my house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 12:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yeah, She & Lieberman could run as Republican lites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
6. We can and should do better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countmyvote4real
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
7. We can find a better progessive Dem NY Senator, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
8. Now here's an entirely original topic on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Well, people who criticize Hillary are constantly being hectored |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 12:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
31. Don't like it? Too bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
9. Many DUers will reject Hill even after she's elected president. Holy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 12:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. She's gonna have to, because most of the Democratic Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 07:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. You're assuming she actually has a chance of being elected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 11:23 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. As things stand at present, Hill has more of a chance than any Dem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 11:37 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Um, sez who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 12:43 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. How would you have answered post #19? I happen to think Hill has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 02:23 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Here's what I think: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 03:12 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. "serious bridge building". She knows there is hard work ahead and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 04:51 PM Response to Reply #39 |
52. As a Loyal Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 12:06 AM Response to Reply #26 |
76. I have so ventured. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fhqwhgads
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 02:00 PM Response to Reply #19 |
48. word... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
10. I voted No because I don't want her to be the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paineinthearse
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 02:15 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Why is her voting records being compared with rethugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 11:58 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. if she becomes the nominee -- she won't be running against Kennedy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snotcicles
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 05:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
54. I will support whoever the Dems pick. But if I had my druthers it would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 12:09 AM Response to Reply #54 |
77. Why not Feingold/Gore? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
11. no..because she won't run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crazy Guggenheim
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 10:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
72. THANK YOU!! She's not going to run!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 02:05 AM Response to Original message |
12. so much for "she has the left in her back pocket" . . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 02:26 AM Response to Original message |
14. I don't want her, you can have her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
15. Running her is a bad idea for several reasons: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 04:25 AM Response to Original message |
16. no way n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
20. No, no, a thousand times no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemGirl7
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
21. I'm not really a Hillary fan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
22. No (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
23. You're not going to get any pulse of the DU Community |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 09:33 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. robble robble robble. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Fri Dec-30-05 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
24. Yeah, let's lose 2008...great idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XOKCowboy
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 03:39 AM Response to Reply #24 |
41. You forgot banning guns.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 09:53 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Ah yes...the Repug formula for Bringing Out The Ignorant Vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
29. I will vote for someone else in the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
30. Not until she admits that going into Iraq was illegal and immoral.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
32. Senator Boxer stood ALONE on January 6th -- nuff said n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 02:25 AM Response to Reply #32 |
37. I would LOVE to see Boxer's name on the ticket, in either slot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquaman
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
34. If our goal in 2008 is to get the shit kicked out of us...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fhqwhgads
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 02:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
49. i agree, but.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 05:27 PM Response to Reply #49 |
59. And your proposal is...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
35. An absolute NO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raysr
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 03:03 AM Response to Original message |
38. Here's a thought from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 07:43 PM Response to Reply #38 |
69. well, actually trying to ELECT a "liberal-progressive" Democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
politicasista
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 03:13 AM Response to Original message |
40. 2006, 2006. Then I will support the Dem nominee for 08 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadesOfGrey
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
43. No! I will never hold my nose and vote again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 12:44 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Why not start working for the Greens now and avoid the rush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadesOfGrey
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 01:21 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Yep, I'm definitely leaning that way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 02:11 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Who "we" nominate? Same voting machines used in primaries as elections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadesOfGrey
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 03:01 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. I DO agree! Arghhh! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 05:21 PM Response to Reply #45 |
57. Because there's still a good chance that OUR party won't nominate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 06:06 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. "Positions most of us find noxious". There may be more than a few moms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 11:45 PM Response to Reply #64 |
74. Uh, I was talking about Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 02:45 AM Response to Reply #74 |
79. Flags and videos are the LEAST important to me. In your post #36 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 11:39 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. I think the crowd whose positions depend on these kinds of craven |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
44. NO. Hell NO. NO freakin' way. Ain't NO way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
47. Substitute Barbara Boxer if you want a great female leader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number9Dream
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
53. Thinking Clark, Edwards, & others have better chance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
55. I voted! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
56. Hillary would mobilize the Conservatives and demoralize Liberals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 05:22 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Hey! What's wrong with that-- it sounds Grrrrrrrrrrreat! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tactical Progressive
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 05:38 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Hillary will mobilize Democrats, demoralize Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadesOfGrey
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 06:24 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Uncompromising liberals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 06:32 PM Response to Reply #61 |
67. Conservatives don't compromise. Why the hell should we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 11:51 PM Response to Reply #61 |
75. Yeah. She's gonna go over like a lead balloon in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
60. Pretty significant, I'd say. Now the question is; "How representative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiley
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
62. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
63. I vote NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drdtroit
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
65. Nope, she's the GOP's candidate of choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 09:26 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. EXACTLY! Wanna see Jeb or some other BFEE puppet take over? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
68. Here's a note to lurking conservatives: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
70. So far, 90% of DU says no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meisje
![]() |
Sat Dec-31-05 10:30 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. and DU speaks for about .001% of the population |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 12:14 AM Response to Reply #73 |
78. I don't know about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 11:46 AM Response to Reply #73 |
81. DU represents WAY more folks than the Freepers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinkpops
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
82. Her aim is off - shooting for the center but hit to the Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
83. We cannot let the Media select our candidate for us and it seems that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 11:55 AM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Well, at least as far back as Nixon, Republicans knew... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 03:16 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Bingo! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Jan-01-06 07:04 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. Here's the funny part... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC