|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:37 PM Original message |
Ok, ONE MORE TIME FOR THE REALLY FUCKING DENSE PEOPLE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldtime dfl_er
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:20 AM Response to Reply #1 |
135. or... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Road Scholar
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 05:02 AM Response to Reply #135 |
268. The "Swiss Miss" is the reason for a lot of confusion. imho nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. but but but its a distraction from stories i'm not posting about anyway! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txindy
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. LOL! Oh, my, that sounds all too familiar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
44. Oooh ooh one more question! How did he manage to get to the guy's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txindy
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:11 PM Response to Reply #44 |
57. He didn't want to shoot his eye out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
117. Lol - saw one like that yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:39 AM Response to Reply #117 |
291. Yeah, he IS a "regular guy"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. Word! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 08:41 AM Response to Reply #3 |
272. Alan Simpson? Or Homer and Jessica? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. Right wit' ya, Beet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salvorhardin
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. And as someone said in another thread, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
67. This report contains NO EYEWITNESSES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:41 AM Response to Reply #67 |
292. Their SOURCE? Why the VP himself is the source and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:49 AM Response to Reply #5 |
295. are you kidding? That ass said that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NEDem
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. " it's got all the sublety of, well, a shotgun blast to the face." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:26 PM Original message |
Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. TESTIFY MY BROTHER! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
8. You Got It.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zangal
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
10. and it leads to a Dem win in texas! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viva_La_Revolution
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
96. Zangal! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libhill
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 03:09 AM Response to Reply #10 |
262. Yee Haww - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikeytherat
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 08:37 AM Response to Reply #10 |
271. Welcome, Zangal! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txindy
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:42 AM Response to Reply #10 |
313. Against a nasty repub opponent in a gerrymandered repub district, no less. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MnFats
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
11. OK, but how do you really feel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:42 PM Original message |
I have been saying this all day... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
12. but but but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:52 PM Response to Reply #12 |
26. Oh Shit! That Smiley!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:59 PM Response to Reply #26 |
38. on second thought, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
13. Yep, the Veep ventilated some old guy and he doesn't give a shit . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hexola
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
14. What a fucking great post - you are a fucking genius!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
15. Even now, a lot of conservatives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalVoice
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
16. Nominated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hexola
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Fuck Yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 04:53 AM Response to Reply #16 |
266. True it is a very big story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katherine Brengle
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
17. it seemed like a non-story two days ago--now, not so much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
101. It NEVER seemed like a non-story to me. VP shoots dude. Seriously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katherine Brengle
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:46 AM Response to Reply #101 |
168. ok, not a "non-story" then, but it didn't seem as big as it is. it was an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
18. Hear, Hear, Beetwasher. You get my last heart for that post ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:49 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Awww! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
19. I talked with John Nichols today and he said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WannaJumpMyScooter
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:54 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. Is that the same author as the Milagro Beanfield War, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:23 PM Response to Reply #30 |
70. Same guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clara T
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
22. Um yeah and who were all the members in the hunting party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meisje
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
24. OHHHhhh! ...I thought he was just peppering him with freedom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 11:13 AM Response to Reply #24 |
315. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
driver8
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
25. But it was just a little "peppering"... harmless gun play between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
27. Yeah, ok, but if the Vice President does it, it's not illegal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niallmac
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
28. Well said and hear felt. You get a heart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
29. here comes the un-popular flip side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:55 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. prove the 22 hour cover-up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:57 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. no as much I want this to blow up in their face (no pun lol) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:58 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Uhh, Bullshit, That Delay Is a DEFACTO Cover Up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. Who lied about the seriousness of the wounds? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:01 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Oh Brother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:07 PM Response to Reply #42 |
49. LOL - thanks for the OP Beetwasher it kicks ass - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:08 PM Response to Reply #42 |
52. I've read reports, thanks. You're the one making accusations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:12 PM Response to Reply #52 |
59. Deleted message |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:47 PM Response to Reply #59 |
88. No, it's not self-evident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:48 PM Response to Reply #88 |
90. Umm, THE VP SHOT A GUY IN THE FACE W/ A SHOTGUN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:55 PM Response to Reply #90 |
103. Wow this thread is just like honey! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:59 PM Response to Reply #90 |
108. If it was an accident, then no...it's not illegal or unethical. I repeat: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:07 AM Response to Reply #108 |
118. The Delay Is Unethical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:13 AM Response to Reply #118 |
126. Thanks for the first honest response you've given me in this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:15 AM Response to Reply #126 |
128. "Lying or misrepresenting his condition=cover up." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:19 AM Response to Reply #128 |
133. I saw those reports, but there's no evidence that at the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:21 AM Response to Reply #133 |
137. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:26 AM Response to Reply #137 |
145. So again, it's just all based on what you believe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:32 AM Response to Reply #145 |
288. Deleted message |
crikkett
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:03 AM Response to Reply #133 |
301. show me how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:53 AM Response to Reply #88 |
176. "illegal or unethical"? How about: OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:57 AM Response to Reply #176 |
179. "preventing the cops from coming onto the grounds" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:01 AM Response to Reply #179 |
182. Right, the cops were making it up, obviously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:05 AM Response to Reply #182 |
186. I honestly said I have not seen that and asked the poster for a link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:09 AM Response to Reply #186 |
188. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:15 AM Response to Reply #188 |
193. Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 11:33 AM Response to Reply #179 |
318. Deleted message |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:40 AM Response to Reply #33 |
312. what part of 'not telling anyone for 24 hours' don't you get? :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:57 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Heh? WTF Are You Talking About? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:02 PM Response to Reply #32 |
43. IMHO its a mistake to think like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:04 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Heh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:00 AM Response to Reply #43 |
110. Who is "CWB"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:37 AM Response to Reply #43 |
311. I they haven't explained WHY there was a delay, then they are COVERING UP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:04 PM Response to Reply #32 |
47. Sorry, there is no "self-evident" cover up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:08 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. Deleted message |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:15 PM Response to Reply #53 |
62. All you can do is insult and resort to cheap sarcasm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:17 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Delay IS ILLEGAL AND UNETHICAL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:23 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. Oh, so now the delay itself is illegal and unethical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:28 PM Response to Reply #69 |
76. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:35 PM Response to Reply #76 |
80. HAHAHA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:37 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Deleted message |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:44 PM Response to Reply #81 |
85. Put asside your schoolyard antics for one moment then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:46 PM Response to Reply #85 |
87. "I have not seen that information. n/t" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:53 PM Response to Reply #87 |
99. sigh. Let's try this one more time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:55 PM Response to Reply #99 |
102. It's Funny As Hell How You Keep Trying To Claim There's No Cover Up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:01 AM Response to Reply #102 |
111. well, I guess it's hopeless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:09 AM Response to Reply #111 |
121. Yes, You May In Fact Be Hopeless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:16 AM Response to Reply #121 |
129. No..if we define a delay as a cover up then I see it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:20 AM Response to Reply #129 |
134. Umm, No, This Is Not The Same Thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:27 AM Response to Reply #134 |
147. The analogy works fine. You did not explain how it's flawed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:35 AM Response to Reply #147 |
290. Bwaahahahaha!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wielding Truth
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 11:55 AM Response to Reply #129 |
322. Dear Harper, wake up! THESE GUYS WORK FOR US . THEY OWE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:22 AM Response to Reply #121 |
199. You are sounding like a woo woo. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:35 AM Response to Reply #199 |
310. Heh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 11:26 AM Response to Reply #310 |
316. No, Chester. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 11:34 AM Response to Reply #316 |
319. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:51 PM Response to Reply #81 |
95. methinks they are approaching the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whopis01
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:11 AM Response to Reply #65 |
281. WTF does that have to do with anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:05 AM Response to Reply #62 |
185. Tell me: Do you think Vince Foster was murdered? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnie
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:13 PM Response to Reply #47 |
60. So if someone is shot on my property |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:19 PM Response to Reply #60 |
66. I have not seen that information. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. What's there to prove? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:03 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Contacting one newspaper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibDemAlways
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:26 PM Response to Reply #45 |
73. They probably figured that the local |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:29 PM Response to Reply #73 |
77. Exactly-just like they contacted the sheriff but were unavailable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnie
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
51. Fact - dick shot someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:06 AM Response to Reply #51 |
116. Actually, the Sherrif was phoned less than 1.5 hours after the shooting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 04:59 AM Response to Reply #116 |
267. I have not seen that information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whopis01
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:23 AM Response to Reply #51 |
285. Get your facts straight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 08:49 AM Response to Reply #29 |
277. Why do we have to prove it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
34. He didn't try to "cover it up". He witheld the information for a day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:00 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Delay=Cover Up, Lying About Injuries=Cover Up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
48. Holding investigation for enough time to sober up ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:11 PM Response to Reply #48 |
58. It's possible, but there's no proof. A delay does not equal cover up. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:15 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. Exactly, and wild claims and speculations only helps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:27 PM Response to Reply #61 |
74. nobody has to claim anything. Cheney has questions to answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:16 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. "He didn't try to "cover it up". He witheld the information for a day" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:26 PM Response to Reply #63 |
72. No, how stupid is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:29 PM Response to Reply #72 |
78. I Think You're Not Very Convincing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:39 PM Response to Reply #78 |
83. Well, that's Ok. I can at least sleep well knowing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:42 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Illegal or Unethical, You Mean Like Shooting A Guy In The Face W/ A |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:47 PM Response to Reply #84 |
89. thats called an accident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:50 PM Response to Reply #89 |
93. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:03 AM Response to Reply #93 |
113. wait, so then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:11 AM Response to Reply #113 |
123. I Have No Fucking Clue What Happened. Do You? Were You There? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:14 AM Response to Reply #123 |
127. Thank you!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:17 AM Response to Reply #127 |
131. Deleted message |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:20 AM Response to Reply #131 |
136. look relax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:22 AM Response to Reply #136 |
141. You Would Know About Mindnumbing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:27 AM Response to Reply #141 |
146. Another point to debating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:33 AM Response to Reply #146 |
289. LOL! Chester, You Need to Brush Up On Your Infilatration Skills |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:19 AM Response to Reply #127 |
132. Sorry, junior, but the vast majority aren't the ones who sound like loons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:30 AM Response to Reply #132 |
149. you are mis interpreting my posts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:36 AM Response to Reply #149 |
155. No, I don't think I am. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:03 AM Response to Reply #155 |
184. If I tell that you are infact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:11 AM Response to Reply #184 |
190. Deleted message |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:27 AM Response to Reply #184 |
203. "pcik a fight, that no fun" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:03 AM Response to Reply #93 |
114. So you think it wasn't an accident? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:10 AM Response to Reply #114 |
122. How The Fuck Should I Know What Happened? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:16 AM Response to Reply #122 |
130. Doctor claims: "more than 5 but "probably less than 150 to 200" pellets" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:42 AM Response to Reply #122 |
162. Well then don't say it's illegal/unethical for him to have shot that guy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:45 AM Response to Reply #162 |
167. Shooting a guy in the face IS legal and ethical? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:49 AM Response to Reply #167 |
173. Yes of course, if it's an accident. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:55 AM Response to Reply #173 |
177. Are you fucking SERIOUS? Shooting someone in the face is ethical? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:01 AM Response to Reply #177 |
183. Yes, quite serious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:06 AM Response to Reply #183 |
187. I consider using a deadly weapon carelessly to be extremely unethical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:12 AM Response to Reply #187 |
191. I don't believe carelessness = unethical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:24 AM Response to Reply #191 |
201. Carelessness with a gun most certainly displays a basic lack of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:25 AM Response to Reply #191 |
202. I'm fucking glad neither you or Cheney will be handling firearms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:51 AM Response to Reply #162 |
296. Only To You Does It Imply That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:56 PM Response to Reply #83 |
105. Thread envy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:05 AM Response to Reply #105 |
115. Deleted message |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:08 AM Response to Reply #115 |
119. Oooo, struck a nerve there, didn't I? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:22 AM Response to Reply #119 |
139. Oh yeah. You really cut me to the bone! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:25 AM Response to Reply #139 |
143. Deleted message |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:22 AM Response to Reply #115 |
138. yeah seriously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:25 AM Response to Reply #138 |
144. Aw, stick around and call us more names! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:29 AM Response to Reply #144 |
148. PLEASE READ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:32 AM Response to Reply #148 |
151. Right. Like the freepers I work with who agree with us loons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:35 AM Response to Reply #148 |
153. then why is every other post filled with these desperate claims... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:37 AM Response to Reply #153 |
157. yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:39 AM Response to Reply #157 |
159. We tend to ride people who insist we're loons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:43 AM Response to Reply #159 |
166. "im foolhearted democrat....IHMO...." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:47 AM Response to Reply #166 |
171. Home home on the range! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:09 AM Response to Reply #171 |
189. one other thing :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:16 AM Response to Reply #189 |
195. we're not the story here. Cheney is. THEY are on the defensive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:16 AM Response to Reply #189 |
196. FYI, insults are more effective when you use spell check. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:33 AM Response to Reply #196 |
207. Seriously you either missed previous posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:37 AM Response to Reply #207 |
209. You used the word "loon". How am I misinterpreting that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:46 AM Response to Reply #209 |
214. spell check loads too slow in this machine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:58 AM Response to Reply #214 |
217. Nice.More spelling and grammatical errors. And you used the word "lunatic" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:02 AM Response to Reply #217 |
219. ok this is snarking..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:05 AM Response to Reply #219 |
221. No, I quite enjoy this, maybe you shouldn't take it so seriously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:08 AM Response to Reply #221 |
223. lol , taking it seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:18 AM Response to Reply #223 |
225. Nope, I never posted anything like this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:29 AM Response to Reply #225 |
230. LMAO !!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:31 AM Response to Reply #230 |
233. not nearly as hilarious as the mental picture of who typed them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:36 AM Response to Reply #233 |
235. I'm no fun, you know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:51 AM Response to Reply #235 |
246. well if it makes you feel better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:36 AM Response to Reply #233 |
236. LOL u guys the same acc? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:38 AM Response to Reply #236 |
238. You keep saying relax like you think we're upset. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:43 AM Response to Reply #238 |
241. uuuhhhh.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:42 AM Response to Reply #236 |
240. I'm you as well, actually. I'm having a conversation with myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:48 AM Response to Reply #240 |
244. hmmmm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:57 AM Response to Reply #244 |
252. didn't you say good night like 3 or 4 times? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 03:00 AM Response to Reply #252 |
256. oh what you want me to go now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:52 AM Response to Reply #240 |
247. Wasn't he worried about this being a distraction? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:56 AM Response to Reply #247 |
251. well now you were the one who admited to "snarking" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:58 AM Response to Reply #251 |
254. Nope, I was rereading your original objections and opining on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:32 AM Response to Reply #230 |
234. I use Opera, it's no trouble at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:40 AM Response to Reply #234 |
239. damn these are some of the weakest bags |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:44 AM Response to Reply #239 |
242. You seem to lose coherence when you get agitated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:47 AM Response to Reply #242 |
243. so this is it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:49 AM Response to Reply #243 |
245. See? You're doing it again: "I was lauging" "what happend" "non the less" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:54 AM Response to Reply #245 |
249. dude thats old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:56 AM Response to Reply #249 |
250. I'm simply reposting your words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:58 AM Response to Reply #250 |
253. ok see now you are taking seriously ,again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:59 AM Response to Reply #253 |
255. It's tragic that I should have to explain anything to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 03:02 AM Response to Reply #255 |
257. uuhhh more pseudo personal attacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 03:04 AM Response to Reply #257 |
258. I never claimed this was a distraction or inferred the op was a lunatic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 03:05 AM Response to Reply #258 |
259. dude you already tried that "loon" angle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 03:09 AM Response to Reply #259 |
261. I'm basking in the afterglow and admiring the view from the greatest page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 03:12 AM Response to Reply #261 |
263. fair enough... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 03:21 AM Response to Reply #263 |
264. No sweat. I've got a report to finish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 03:27 AM Response to Reply #264 |
265. well good luck with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flubadubya
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 05:06 AM Response to Reply #265 |
270. Oh for pity's sake... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:44 AM Response to Reply #265 |
294. Hey, Jeenyus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:03 AM Response to Reply #261 |
303. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:57 AM Response to Reply #148 |
299. Hey Jeenyus! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:35 AM Response to Reply #144 |
154. Your talents are wasted here. Go now, take your search skills |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:38 AM Response to Reply #154 |
158. Listen! Your long lost sunken thread is crying out for its mommy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:41 AM Response to Reply #158 |
160. wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:43 AM Response to Reply #160 |
163. Oh, that's nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:47 AM Response to Reply #158 |
170. Don't worry yourself, I'll post it again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:49 AM Response to Reply #170 |
172. Oh, please do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:43 AM Response to Reply #154 |
164. its hardly talent, its just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:51 AM Response to Reply #164 |
174. "independet non fanitically driven common sense.." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:15 AM Response to Reply #174 |
194. I ll say the same thing to you I said to "beam me up" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:18 AM Response to Reply #194 |
197. the problem is, YOU don't have an argument. Just typos. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:30 AM Response to Reply #197 |
205. fair enough, I didnt know typos bothered you so much :p |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:32 AM Response to Reply #194 |
206. I am 'beam me up', genius. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:40 AM Response to Reply #206 |
211. no just the first one with this format |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:43 AM Response to Reply #211 |
212. No, I'm giving you pointers on how to snark successfully. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:44 AM Response to Reply #212 |
213. whats snarking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:51 AM Response to Reply #213 |
215. Hmm, I believe you were the one who cried "OH MY GAWD" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:55 AM Response to Reply #215 |
216. there is only 1 right answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:59 AM Response to Reply #216 |
218. Sorry, accusing others of trolling is against the rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:04 AM Response to Reply #218 |
220. oh my bad... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:07 AM Response to Reply #220 |
222. Ah! You frequent dating and chat sites. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:14 AM Response to Reply #222 |
224. weak! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:22 AM Response to Reply #224 |
226. No really, your posts do seem to be of the type found on such sites. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:21 AM Response to Reply #194 |
283. I couldn't agree more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:11 AM Response to Reply #83 |
124. Sticking one's fingers in one's ears, chanting LA LA LA LA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:52 PM Response to Reply #48 |
97. It's called a "Lizzie Lam," Hissyspit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:58 AM Response to Reply #97 |
180. Yes, I remember. "Cover Up" or not, technically, is really just semantics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyedyeto
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:49 PM Response to Reply #34 |
92. Not allowing the local law enforcement to interview the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:56 AM Response to Reply #92 |
178. I have read several reports and seen several timelines. Can you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyedyeto
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:53 AM Response to Reply #178 |
298. Here is your link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
40. Meanwhile, the investigation into the NSA wiretaps begins to lose support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XOKCowboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:07 PM Response to Reply #40 |
50. That's the real tragedy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:08 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. yup... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:28 PM Response to Reply #50 |
75. yeah, because 2 days of not posting about Cheney here will save the world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:44 PM Response to Reply #75 |
86. geez already.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:49 PM Response to Reply #86 |
91. so why aren't you posting about anything important? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:56 PM Response to Reply #91 |
107. not to me, but the democratic movement.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:03 AM Response to Reply #107 |
112. yeah, i'm on a witchhunt. You're a regular martyr. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:11 AM Response to Reply #112 |
125. Look at what you are doing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:22 AM Response to Reply #125 |
140. You just told the op he sounds like a loon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:32 AM Response to Reply #140 |
150. OH MY GAWD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:41 AM Response to Reply #150 |
161. Goodness! Such dramatics...tsk tsk tsk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:30 AM Response to Reply #150 |
204. "foolhearted" - we have a clever new word here??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:23 AM Response to Reply #204 |
227. It's HUGH !!!111 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:22 AM Response to Reply #150 |
307. Does Schizophrenia Run In Your Family? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:24 AM Response to Reply #125 |
142. Absurd is definitely the word for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:33 AM Response to Reply #142 |
152. whatever man/woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:36 AM Response to Reply #152 |
156. "you aint even arguing the issue" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:00 AM Response to Reply #86 |
109. Cheney asks a lawyer...a millionare at that...Could you take one for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
54. OH FOR SURE....In the real world I keep telling myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
missouri dem 2
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:56 PM Response to Reply #54 |
104. I don't think that Hanity is going to be able to sell the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
56. he just peppered him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnie
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:17 PM Response to Reply #56 |
64. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:25 PM Response to Reply #56 |
71. Yes, they're making such a big deal out of a little boo boo... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightOwwl
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
68. "He might die." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
79. Great post AND you flushed a couple of "quail." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txindy
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:05 AM Response to Reply #79 |
278. Tenacious quail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
82. Check your pms! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
94. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
98. Got it. And, please do all you can to encourage Maj Hackett to run ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
100. Yeah, that's about it. No eyewitnesses, no face-to-face with law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer
![]() |
Tue Feb-14-06 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
106. Best rant of the day! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:09 AM Response to Reply #106 |
120. Why, yes it is. Much better than this one: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
165. Amen Brother Beet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
169. Accident! Got lots of 'em in Texas! Accident! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Spock
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
175. I'm with ya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
henslee
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
181. Yup.... And MSNBC aids coverup by scrubbing Armstrong's "Beer" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:13 AM Response to Original message |
192. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
198. FOR YOU, HARPER: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:35 AM Response to Reply #198 |
208. Thankyou! And there is also this story put out in regards to that: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:42 AM Response to Reply #208 |
293. Seriously, I Have No Idea Why Anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
200. Hey mods, Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 01:39 AM Response to Original message |
210. gotcha, K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kablooie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:23 AM Response to Original message |
228. Now just WHAT did Cheney do again? I don't think I quite get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
229. I've always said that the top criminals in the bush gang could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:31 AM Response to Reply #229 |
232. They blamed it on the victim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:53 AM Response to Reply #232 |
248. classic fucking repukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:29 AM Response to Original message |
231. It was on PRIVATE PROPERTY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 02:37 AM Response to Reply #231 |
237. Drive by drop offs at the hospital! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libhill
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 03:06 AM Response to Original message |
260. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 05:03 AM Response to Original message |
269. But I just heard Lou Dobbs say it ain't no big thang n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
273. But there are so many stories that can't be explained away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
274. I've said since hour one.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikeytherat
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
275. Like The Daily Show, repeating over, and over, and over: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
276. Yes and imagine the outrage and up roar if it had been a Dem VP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 11:34 AM Response to Reply #276 |
320. Indeed. Has anyone even asked about the *women* on the trip? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wheezy
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
279. *wanders in to popular thread* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
280. On an overnight trip with a woman who was not his wife |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:52 AM Response to Reply #280 |
297. Yeah, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
282. Cheney must address the nation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:23 AM Response to Reply #282 |
286. He is toast regardless. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
284. And just as serious is the fact that when the cops come out to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
287. The Shooting: Medium Story. Hiding a Shooting: MAJOR! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:00 AM Response to Reply #287 |
300. the stats show that at most it happens 2x per day, with 1/5 being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:16 AM Response to Reply #300 |
306. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:28 AM Response to Reply #306 |
309. absolutely. And therein lies most of the story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tgnyc
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
302. A lot of passion, but I think one key word is missing from your post: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:05 AM Response to Reply #302 |
305. Heh? Bullshit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
304. drunk hunters get shot all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Road Scholar
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
308. LOL. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
314. FOR ALL THE WHACKY PEOPLE WHO THINK THERE WAS A COVERUP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
317. Straight and to the point. Get the message, it's frightening. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Klukie
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
321. Hear Hear! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The empressof all
![]() |
Wed Feb-15-06 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
323. Locking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC