|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
bloom
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 09:42 PM Original message |
Here is some free speech for you.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PDJane
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. Lord and Lady |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. Recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mongo
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Yep. Cartoons are dangerous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Advocating education about the issue is only oppression to you, mongo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mongo
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. If you want some education, why not read Nadine Strossen's book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:01 AM Response to Reply #13 |
28. Show me where I tried to stifle dissent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mongo
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
3. More propaganda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. So those cartoons never existed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mongo
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Did I say the cartoons never existed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Um, it's called free speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mongo
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. And who is attacking who in this thread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. "Get a life?" This from someone who does DU searches for the word "porn"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mongo
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:58 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. So did Bloom PM you before posting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:00 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. I'd think bloom could stand up for herself, you know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:05 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Why should she? You've already tried and convicted her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:02 AM Response to Reply #24 |
29. So I'm conspiring with the op because I disagree with you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bloom
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:26 PM Response to Original message |
8. From Stan Goff: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mongo
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. If you would like the other side of this story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
10. Deleted message |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Why are you attacking bloom and misrepresenting her posts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I don't think I am misrepresnting anything... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:50 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. She hasn't so much as opined about the articles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:53 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Selection of those articles is an expression of opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:54 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. So your attacks on her are justified, in your mind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mongo
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Yes, anyone with a contrary opinion is "attacking" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Just like I said in my response to bloom... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:10 AM Response to Reply #22 |
32. I'll let his posts speak for themselves: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. They were not attacks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:07 AM Response to Reply #23 |
31. It's not criticism if she never made the statements you attributed to her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:15 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Your are mistaken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:22 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. So if she offers no opinion and never posts in this thread, she's guilty? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:25 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Can't you have the patience to see what she has to say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:28 AM Response to Reply #40 |
43. I'm addressing personal attacks because they are the reason why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:31 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Where were you when I needed defending? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:36 AM Response to Reply #44 |
50. Amen to that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:37 AM Response to Reply #44 |
51. Um, my cape was at the cleaners? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:34 AM Response to Reply #43 |
46. If you post such a thing on a main forum here, don't expect safe passage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:39 AM Response to Reply #46 |
52. She didn't say ANYTHING. You attacked her without her saying anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:40 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. When you quote an article, you DO say something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:45 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. No, people post articles all the time with just one word: Discuss. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katherine Brengle
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:36 AM Response to Reply #10 |
48. I don't think that was fair-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:01 AM Response to Reply #48 |
63. I firmly disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katherine Brengle
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:30 AM Response to Reply #63 |
89. You believe porn is an "unmitigated social good"??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:49 AM Response to Reply #89 |
104. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
15. They're in Hustler because not EVERYONE on the "left" agrees with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. More attacks and misrepresentation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mongo
![]() |
Tue Feb-28-06 11:59 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Might not be your adgenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:14 AM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Honesty about my opinion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katherine Brengle
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:46 AM Response to Reply #15 |
56. I really don't understand how anyone can support an industry that makes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:15 AM Response to Original message |
35. Hustler doesn't represent all porn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:19 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Great observation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:25 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. So then why does it bother you that some people dislike it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:26 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Doesn't bother me if they dislike it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:42 AM Response to Reply #41 |
54. So why didn't you say that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:23 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. No, but it is representative of a lot of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:27 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. On what basis do you form that opinion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:33 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. They aren't considered mainstream? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:35 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. How much other porn do you examine on a regular basis? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:51 AM Response to Reply #47 |
57. Yes, as a woman, I am sworn to hate porn and never read or buy any of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:55 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Because I asked your opinion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:01 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. How did I offend you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:10 AM Response to Reply #62 |
67. You attack me personally when I ask significant questions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:13 AM Response to Reply #67 |
71. Ah, I see you didn't bother reading the articles in the op. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:15 AM Response to Reply #71 |
73. How dare you allege that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:19 AM Response to Reply #73 |
76. You think that is over the top? See post #66 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:24 AM Response to Reply #76 |
78. Are you talking about MY pms? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:24 AM Response to Reply #78 |
80. Are you sure you don't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:26 AM Response to Reply #80 |
83. Ooooooooo, how cryptic! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:26 AM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:27 AM Response to Reply #84 |
87. So are you Sifl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:17 AM Response to Reply #71 |
74. Oh, and, nice changing of the subject. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:32 AM Response to Reply #74 |
91. Right, that's what it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:33 AM Response to Reply #91 |
93. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:36 AM Response to Reply #38 |
49. What percentage is "a lot?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:52 AM Response to Reply #49 |
58. Well considering we have never been able to ONCE discuss racist cops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:57 AM Response to Reply #58 |
61. Again, you change the subject to avoid answering the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:03 AM Response to Reply #61 |
64. What percentage of personal attacks are considered acceptable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:11 AM Response to Reply #64 |
68. Admit that you cannot answer the question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:18 AM Response to Reply #68 |
75. I gave you the answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:24 AM Response to Reply #75 |
79. That was not the question, and you know it. You are now being dishonest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:27 AM Response to Reply #79 |
86. I don't see an admission to personally attacking the op in there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:32 AM Response to Reply #86 |
92. You won't, because it was not an attack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:39 AM Response to Reply #92 |
98. Attributing motive IS AN ATTACK . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:48 AM Response to Reply #98 |
103. I get to whenever I choose to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:54 AM Response to Reply #103 |
106. You attacked bloom before she made a single statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:59 AM Response to Reply #106 |
108. You've made this about you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:05 AM Response to Reply #58 |
65. If you can't defend, disregard? - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:11 AM Response to Reply #65 |
69. Are you paying attention? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:14 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. Criticism is not attack. And does not excuse you from making up data. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:22 AM Response to Reply #72 |
77. Nice try, but we're not playing by your rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:26 AM Response to Reply #77 |
82. Then you are admitting to being a total liar? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:30 AM Response to Reply #82 |
88. I don't discuss issues of importance with posters who attack others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:35 AM Response to Reply #88 |
94. Now you are being a complete jerk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:40 AM Response to Reply #94 |
99. Now you're calling me names. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:45 AM Response to Reply #99 |
102. No, I'm telling you how you are acting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:31 AM Response to Reply #69 |
90. I'm not defending pornography, I'm defending my post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:36 AM Response to Reply #90 |
96. Where did I declare Hustler representative of the entire porn industry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:51 AM Response to Reply #96 |
105. Again, you are inventing what I've said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:59 AM Response to Reply #105 |
107. Let's recap: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 02:01 AM Response to Reply #107 |
109. An honest debater answers the question asked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:37 AM Response to Reply #90 |
97. My prediction... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:41 AM Response to Reply #97 |
100. My prediction is that you'll start calling me names. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:44 AM Response to Reply #100 |
101. You won't answer HIS question either? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:12 AM Response to Reply #65 |
70. That seems to be what I am seeing here too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:25 AM Response to Reply #70 |
81. Deleted message |
benburch
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:27 AM Response to Reply #81 |
85. No, it is you admitting to being dishonest. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
59. "24%"!!!!!!!!!!11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:06 AM Response to Reply #59 |
66. Snort! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 01:36 AM Response to Reply #59 |
95. Oh come on now, 24% is a LOT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Wed Mar-01-06 02:02 AM Response to Original message |
110. Locking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC