|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
|
| RedOnce
|
Fri Mar-03-06 10:52 AM Original message |
| DIEBOLD - 2008 "The fix is in" - Moscow Times |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| magellan
|
Fri Mar-03-06 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. The Free Press is alive in Moscow?? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Skink
|
Fri Mar-03-06 10:57 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. They practiced in 04 by padding W's popular vote in CA. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| VelmaD
|
Fri Mar-03-06 10:59 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. They did it in Texas too... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| serryjw
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 28. I always believed they did it also in Colorado |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Spike from MN
|
Fri Mar-03-06 04:28 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 56. Add MN to the list. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Skink
|
Fri Mar-03-06 01:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 48. Yep. Pad their vote in a safe state. Exit polls what exit polls. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| magellan
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:10 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 14. That ain't enchilada I'm smelling |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Blue_In_AK
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 33. I believe they did it in Alaska, too. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AntiFascist
|
Fri Mar-03-06 04:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 55. I was wondering if previous vote fraud in Calilfornia... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Senator
|
Fri Mar-03-06 08:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 84. New Jersey too |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bananas
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:04 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 7. Chris Floyd writes a lot of good articles |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lyonn
|
Sat Mar-04-06 01:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 93. Well now that's damn embarrassing! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Maraya1969
|
Sat Mar-04-06 04:25 AM Response to Reply #93 |
| 97. I say "GOOD" let the whole world talk about how corrupt the US is |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| VelmaD
|
Fri Mar-03-06 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. Why is this in the Moscow TImes and not... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clark2008
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 36. Because the former Soviet Union has people who give a damn |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bvar22
|
Fri Mar-03-06 01:18 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 44. In the Ukraine, they also had a leader... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| librechik
|
Fri Mar-03-06 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. hope Chris is wrong! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GregD
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:02 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. Look for his past articles. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| librechik
|
Fri Mar-03-06 01:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 45. oh, I know--I'm most appreciative of his fine writing |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hubert Flottz
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 8. When Will DiFi and Barb chime in? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SoCalDem
|
Fri Mar-03-06 04:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 57. They won't.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| converted_democrat
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. Personally, I think the one state where they could screw the pooch |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ellenfl
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:09 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 12. everyone should vote absentee . . . and keep an eye on the garbage cans. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| converted_democrat
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:14 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 16. That's how I voted last year, and I plan to this year too.. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FrannyD
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:58 AM Response to Reply #16 |
| 21. Apply for permanant Absentee Status |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| serryjw
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 29. WHY do you think this is safer? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| converted_democrat
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:51 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 32. Because the machines that are used to count the votes are different |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| serryjw
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:54 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 34. What paper trail? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| converted_democrat
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:57 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 35. Because you can call into your election super's office and get |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| serryjw
|
Fri Mar-03-06 01:06 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 40. The issue is not whether your vote is counted |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| converted_democrat
|
Fri Mar-03-06 01:11 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 41. See, and I thought I was covered by voting absentee.. Thank you for |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| magellan
|
Fri Mar-03-06 01:02 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 38. They aren't in my county. All are Diebold Accu-vote with GEMS tabulator. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Higans
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 66. what good is activism in a police state? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| converted_democrat
|
Fri Mar-03-06 08:29 PM Response to Reply #66 |
| 85. It's bad, but it isn't that bad yet.. You aren't going to get an |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ani Yun Wiya
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 67. Think they can't get away with it? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| robbedvoter
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 79. Arnie was not an anomaly - pure Diebold too! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| converted_democrat
|
Fri Mar-03-06 08:39 PM Response to Reply #79 |
| 86. I'm not saying that you're wrong, but I have friends that are normally |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Uben
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
| 10. The California legislature |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Buck Rabbit
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 27. Actually I think it should be a federal law, High Treason. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Higans
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 69. Die Bold machines have wireless modems |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RedOnce
|
Sat Mar-04-06 12:34 PM Response to Reply #69 |
| 101. Good points. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Higans
|
Sat Mar-04-06 09:27 PM Response to Reply #101 |
| 108. Thank you. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dr. Jones
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
| 11. This article is defeatest |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RedOnce
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:39 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 18. I see it as sounding an alarm! Do nothing and... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dr. Jones
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:00 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 22. I agree, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| stellanoir
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
| 13. I've posted this before |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| serryjw
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:48 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 31. I have a friend that was in many of the battleground states before |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| stellanoir
|
Fri Mar-03-06 01:31 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 46. I too am teetering on |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| soleft
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
| 15. Jim Kramer was touting Diebold as a great investment last night |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JudyM
|
Fri Mar-03-06 02:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 50. I dislike his attitude that investment value doesn't involve ethics. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CrispyQ
|
Fri Mar-03-06 05:45 PM Response to Reply #50 |
| 60. Jim has no ethics when it comes to making money. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JudyM
|
Sat Mar-04-06 12:27 AM Response to Reply #60 |
| 89. In his defense, I've seen him cover green companies. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Higans
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:24 PM Response to Reply #50 |
| 71. Bayer supported Hitler with Sterilization drug testing on Jews and Bush |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| debbierlus
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
| 17. It is terrible, but premature to assume California is going to be Red |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| annabanana
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:58 AM Response to Reply #17 |
| 20. but not before '06... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CrispyQ
|
Fri Mar-03-06 05:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 61. Another possibility that could help CA is the Hollywood crowd. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hang a left
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 76. Tis important to remember there are Reds in Blue clothing. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mandate My Ass
|
Fri Mar-03-06 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
| 19. kick |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| johnnypneumatic
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. computers are vulnerable to electrostatic shock |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OnionPatch
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. Personally, I think |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| toymachines
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 30. I agree, I would drive the 600 miles to storm his office |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mvd
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. If it's a close election again.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Junkdrawer
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 26. With that kind of control, it's as close as they want to make it... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| glitch
|
Fri Mar-03-06 02:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 49. Yep - there is no reason to think the polls aren't rigged too. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bloom
|
Fri Mar-03-06 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. I've suspected all alone |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| genieroze
|
Fri Mar-03-06 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. Hell, I could have told you they are gonna rig it again. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dover
|
Fri Mar-03-06 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 42. Why aren't the Dems screaming bloody murder about this? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nadinbrzezinski
|
Fri Mar-03-06 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
| 43. Don't worry I have sent letters to my reps |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Czolgosz
|
Fri Mar-03-06 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 47. Jesus H Christ in an Uncle Sam suit? Is he one of the Fighting Democrats? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RedOnce
|
Fri Mar-03-06 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 51. Please keep this KICKED! I think that this is an important story... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cobalt Violet
|
Fri Mar-03-06 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 52. Of course it won't be covered in our media. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DemReadingDU
|
Fri Mar-03-06 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 53. Definitely, Ohio |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dragonbreathp9d
|
Fri Mar-03-06 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 54. Well, have any liberal hacker friends? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joanne98
|
Fri Mar-03-06 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 58. What the fuck is the matter with Maria? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jus_the_facts
|
Fri Mar-03-06 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 59. D'uh...no shit sherlock... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CrispyQ
|
Fri Mar-03-06 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 62. How many more questionable elections & |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Higans
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:33 PM Response to Reply #62 |
| 74. I share your feelings. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RagAss
|
Fri Mar-03-06 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 63. Once Cali goes Red....It's the detention camps for us........ |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Higans
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:37 PM Response to Reply #63 |
| 75. Yup. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nikki Stone 1
|
Fri Mar-03-06 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 64. Are we sure that Donald Rumsfeld didn't plant this story to intimidate us? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dorkulon
|
Fri Mar-03-06 06:51 PM Response to Reply #64 |
| 65. How would that make any sense? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nikki Stone 1
|
Sat Mar-04-06 01:36 AM Response to Reply #65 |
| 94. Here's how |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hang a left
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:42 PM Response to Reply #64 |
| 77. It is true. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Higans
|
Sat Mar-04-06 09:37 PM Response to Reply #77 |
| 109. how do you think the jerk off got into power? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| robbedvoter
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:54 PM Response to Reply #64 |
| 80. Ugh...Chris Floyd a Rummy Plant? Read his other stuff. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nikki Stone 1
|
Sat Mar-04-06 01:38 AM Response to Reply #80 |
| 95. Read my answer above |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bonito
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 68. Kick n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Helga Scow Stern
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 70. We knew this was on the agenda as soon as they got rid of a good SoS. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rumpel
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:29 PM Response to Reply #70 |
| 73. Exactly. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| robbedvoter
|
Sat Mar-04-06 10:44 AM Response to Reply #73 |
| 98. And some Dems join in I recall. Not unlike Davis - same tecnique |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rumpel
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 72. All DU'ers should check their own counties what systems they chose to |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Higans
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:51 PM Response to Reply #72 |
| 78. it's all been Moot since 2000, or at least since 04 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dorkulon
|
Fri Mar-03-06 07:58 PM Response to Reply #78 |
| 81. If this stuff is true, and I think it is... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rumpel
|
Fri Mar-03-06 08:05 PM Response to Reply #81 |
| 82. Yes, there should be, join the fight. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dorkulon
|
Fri Mar-03-06 08:07 PM Response to Reply #82 |
| 83. er... what fight? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mr_Jefferson_24
|
Sat Mar-04-06 12:50 AM Response to Reply #81 |
| 90. I think it's the denial factor... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RedOnce
|
Sat Mar-04-06 11:46 AM Response to Reply #90 |
| 100. So true! I hope that we can change that with this issue. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| father_of_hope
|
Fri Mar-03-06 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 87. this is not news |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cdsilv
|
Fri Mar-03-06 09:05 PM Response to Reply #87 |
| 88. Hmm, perhaps the DEMS could find a couple of 'black hats' |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Independent_Liberal
|
Sat Mar-04-06 11:00 AM Response to Reply #87 |
| 99. True, we know about this already. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lovuian
|
Sat Mar-04-06 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
| 91. I agree there is no reason why diebold is still around |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Up2Late
|
Sat Mar-04-06 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 92. Yep, I have first hand experience with this problem here in Georgia. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hippo_Tron
|
Sat Mar-04-06 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 96. Dumb question, can't a couple of democratic computer nerds rig it too? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Up2Late
|
Sat Mar-04-06 02:20 PM Response to Reply #96 |
| 102. Oh they probably could, but don't say that around here... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hippo_Tron
|
Sat Mar-04-06 05:38 PM Response to Reply #102 |
| 105. My point is aren't the Republicans buying Diebold machines worried? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Up2Late
|
Sat Mar-04-06 06:11 PM Response to Reply #105 |
| 107. True, but Diebold and several of the other corporations that... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clara T
|
Sat Mar-04-06 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 103. kick for truth |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KAT119
|
Sat Mar-04-06 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 104. Chris Floyd is brilliant! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| goforit
|
Sat Mar-04-06 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 106. The truth is out around the world except in white-trash America(Repugs) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Mar 26th 2026, 04:45 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC