KyuzoGator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-14-06 12:29 PM
Original message |
| I think we should just settle the Lib vs. Con debate with a spelling bee. |
|
"If you spell words correctly, you are a terrorist."
Really, why can't these people spell?
|
sui generis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-14-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
that wood be udderly unfare, kind of like making Dan Quail spell poe-taw-toe.
|
KyuzoGator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-14-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. I am ded series. It would be HUGH. |
|
I curse the day AOL made it easy for idiots to go online. I remember a time around 1996 when it was mostly intellectuals.
|
NewWaveChick1981
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-14-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I won several spelling bees in school---so that makes me a terrorist, does it? Anyone who spells correctly is, to the Repukes, a subversive, 'cause they're different somehow. :P
|
theHandpuppet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-14-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. I've seen some pretty atrocious spelling here, too |
|
I think some folks here need to consult a dictionary before posting. I can't fault freepers for their abysmal grammar and spelling when I see prime examples among the DU fora. I don't comment on them anymore because the usual response is a real roasting. Let's take a good look at our own glass house before we start throwing stones.
|
sui generis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-14-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
theHandpuppet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-14-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. You just proved my point. |
Dhalgren
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-14-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. As Doc Holiday said to Ike Clanton, |
|
"Ike, maybe poker is just not your game. I know, let's have a spelling contest!"
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 19th 2026, 10:28 PM
Response to Original message |