|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Skinner
ADMIN ![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:33 PM Original message |
Mixed feelings on Feingold's censure resolution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagingInMiami
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. Perhaps Feingold didn't ask for help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. He has taken a gamble and I believe that he will ultimately win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagingInMiami
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
78. Exactly. It will be the majority of American people who will step |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowdogmi
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 12:33 AM Response to Reply #16 |
152. I think that we need to show vocal support. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
71. I find that hard to believe. And point to Sarbane covering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagingInMiami
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:27 PM Response to Reply #71 |
79. I didn't see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:40 PM Response to Reply #79 |
84. I wonder if there is a way for you to see. It was quite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 11:00 PM Response to Reply #71 |
141. They all took an oath to defend the constitution. I find it incredulous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsIt1984Yet
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 06:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
120. Russ is not like that. Did you know he posted promises to voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagingInMiami
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 07:32 PM Response to Reply #120 |
122. I don't really much about him, but I like what I see so far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsIt1984Yet
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 07:42 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. He's worth checking out. He just started blogging. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagingInMiami
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 08:39 PM Response to Reply #123 |
130. What I also like about him is his obvious intelligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 03:57 PM Response to Reply #123 |
171. I lived in Wisconsin when he first ran for U.S. Senate. It was a great, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsIt1984Yet
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 07:26 PM Response to Reply #171 |
175. You missed his 2004 campaign against a car salesman - Russ Darrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 01:31 PM Response to Reply #175 |
180. I was in California by then, but I always suspected Feingold would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 08:22 PM Response to Reply #120 |
129. The DINOs have no spine either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokercat999
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 04:58 AM Response to Reply #120 |
158. Is he for real? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZModerate
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 09:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
132. And for fucks sake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyCougar
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. The Dems in the Senate have had more than enough time to review it by now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleever
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. Hitting the "alert" button on you. Seriously, thanks for a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
4. Then call your Senators and ask them this question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paulie
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
5. It really makes it hard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
6. I support Feingold in this censure resolution. I believe it deserves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
7. I don't know that it will play out like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
8. There has not been enough time to frame it as an accountability issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
10. I expect it to fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I disagree with that idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. I didn't say both can't be done - I'm saying the framing will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
35. I just don't think Senate Dems will use that as a reason to vote against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:24 PM Response to Reply #35 |
43. Ah..gotcha. (as in - I see what you're saying now) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:28 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. LOL, I think we're on the same page now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
connecticut yankee
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 06:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
117. It will fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 11:27 PM Response to Reply #117 |
144. Not all Democrats are spineless! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
11. democrats act the like the nambie pambie wife of an abusive husband |
Add to my Journal | Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Agreed. The total lack of spine demonstrated by "our" Senators is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 05:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
110. I am so sick of this comparison...it's insulting and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 06:05 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. sorry about the comparison n/t |
Add to my Journal | Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 06:19 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. thx. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaryBear
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 10:38 PM Response to Reply #114 |
137. Err. Ditto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 11:25 AM Response to Reply #112 |
165. You should be. Read your own sig line. It condemns you as a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaryBear
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 10:36 PM Response to Reply #110 |
136. Thx, femrap! There is no excuse for abuse! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 10:46 PM Response to Reply #136 |
139. My pleasure, MaryBear.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 11:22 AM Response to Reply #110 |
164. Thanks, you beat me to it! What a REVOLTING comment. Attitudes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greybnk48
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
12. I don't think Feingold does anything "half-assed" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewagner
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
14. Thanks for the post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greybnk48
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:52 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Well, much as we would like to think otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
15. maybe its not going to come to a vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
39. My impression, too, was that Dems want to block a vote until they have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
18. The Feingold resolution is necessary public policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minnesota Libra
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
19. Skinner, this is the one issue that will make or break it for me....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
21. As mentioned elsewhere, if Donna Brazile is on board, how risky can it be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nightjock
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
96. WHAT!!!!????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
23. Who knows, Murtha didn't have much support either, now more and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:18 PM Response to Reply #23 |
41. Good point! Sometimes I think our Dems wait for someone to dive first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BR_Parkway
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:41 PM Response to Reply #23 |
95. Seems like the good Dr Dean did the same thing, and every thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:46 PM Response to Reply #95 |
101. BR_Parkway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
24. ok, then why don't we (DU) stop being half-assed ourselves and start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
25. Surely Feingold did seek support. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinnie From Indy
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
26. There appears to be many layers to this issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice Is Comin
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
27. I have no reservations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
28. Well said! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pharaoh
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
29. I think it might "be" the spying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wrate
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:05 PM Response to Reply #29 |
67. If you are right, and I think you are, then that means Russ must be clean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iowa
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:44 PM Response to Reply #29 |
100. Pharaoh, I've heard this proposed before... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pharaoh
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 07:15 PM Response to Reply #100 |
121. we all have some dirt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iowa
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 07:53 PM Response to Reply #121 |
126. Well, therein lies the problem... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pharaoh
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 08:47 PM Response to Reply #126 |
131. just my opinon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynthia
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 08:01 PM Response to Reply #121 |
128. youthful indiscretion didn't seem to hurt W |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neil Lisst
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
30. I'm with Feingold on this. The party has to stand UP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
norml
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
31. I think there will only be a few who take a stand this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
carolinalady
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
32. Yesterday in the Senate-I was disheartened that he did not stay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
33. "No one could have anticipated" Feingold would introduce a resolution.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. LOL - nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:29 PM Response to Reply #33 |
47. Great Catch! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:04 PM Response to Reply #33 |
66. It's hurts to laugh. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
34. I'd sure like to hear the explanations from the Dems who refuse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
36. Another reason for mixed feelings ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
37. Those who are not afraid of failure will be the winners. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
40. It's as simple as this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
42. This is a good move by Dems any way you look at it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
44. I don't applaud Feingold on this move, yes, Bush needs to be held |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyCougar
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:38 PM Response to Reply #44 |
55. I totally disagree with this assessment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
45. I don't think he thought they would all support it...but it was important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
48. Just the act of presenting it is a victory in itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
49. Skinner read today's firedoglake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 06:07 PM Response to Reply #49 |
113. Firedoglake is a must read as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
50. I'd prefer he try and fail than not try at all. The fear of taking risks, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Witch
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
51. "large number of Democrats defecting" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoAmericanTaliban
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
52. Feingold did the right thing. at least it made the news . a year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sadie5
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:38 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Called my Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
53. We've all been waiting for the Dems to do something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnoopDog
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
56. It is similar to one soldier standing up because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
57. His attempt will fail miserably. All of us here, and 39% of the public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
58. Since you aren't looking at the goings on in Washington from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
59. The Breaking Story about the ACLU finding spying on anti-war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ksec
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
60. Like I always say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ksec
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:50 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. the people are with us. Read the polls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sheelz
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
62. Criminals always spin! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:55 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Either way they were going to spin it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sheelz
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:04 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. That's right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jane_pippin
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
63. I don't understand what they're so scared of. The man's at what, 34%, 36% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:06 PM Response to Reply #63 |
68. Remember the rumored strategy is to let the Thuggery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jane_pippin
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:35 PM Response to Reply #68 |
82. Ah. Right. Sit back and let them implode. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:41 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. It's okay. It's nearly Spring and baseball isn't a sport |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
69. With a plethora of impeachable offenses to choose from, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DinahMoeHum
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
70. Once again, the Beltway Dems go pee-pee on their own tummies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
72. Call me a "purist", but the old cliche' goes,"You've got to stand for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
73. nicely written |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w8liftinglady
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
74. If it is not supported by Democrats and Republicans- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
november3rd
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
75. Skinner: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
76. The courage of a leader is to stand when everyone else is sitting.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:17 PM Response to Reply #76 |
91. Excellent Post Frenchie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lakeguy
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
77. this needed to be done. feingold shouldn't have to line up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slingsam
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
80. Being Lily-Livered is not an option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
81. I pumped Bayh's inbox with my position on this subject |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:49 PM Response to Reply #81 |
102. Not surprisingly, DLCer fave Bayh does not support Feingold's resolution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 05:03 PM Response to Reply #102 |
105. It's sad really. This man has taken no position on anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 08:26 PM Response to Reply #105 |
177. The apple truly fell quite far from the tree in the Bayh family |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
83. It will now be on record, something to think about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muchacho
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
86. jaws of victory.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RazzleDazzle
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
87. That reasoning is precisely what caused them NOT to support him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
88. The censure is "too liberal" for the appeasement wing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:19 PM Response to Reply #88 |
92. Was it Feingold who said this is a "Civic Issue" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
89. I agree with every word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
i miss america
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
90. There's more to the story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
93. "party line vote" or even something close would do it. Even having the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
94. IFFY...at best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WestMichRad
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
97. This is exactly why I'm having a hard time supporting the Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
98. does this mean he DID try to get support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
99. At a time when Bush has the arrogance to break the law, then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danimich1
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:54 PM Response to Reply #99 |
103. They're all simpering cowards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 05:11 PM Response to Reply #103 |
107. I'd rather work to encourage other Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BR_Parkway
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
104. Maybe a strong media strategy - if it was all Dems YES, all Repugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
106. How much work or support should he really need anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 05:13 PM Response to Reply #106 |
108. I love Class Warrior's formulation: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 06:22 PM Response to Reply #108 |
116. Class Warrior said it perfectly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paul Dlugokencky
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 06:04 AM Response to Reply #106 |
159. DITHERING DEMS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DanCa
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
109. I am for censure - however I wont insult anyone who disagrees with me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
111. This is a worthy discussion that mirrors many others at DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VP505
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
115. I sent Reid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsIt1984Yet
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
118. No offense, Skinner, but it's not Russ's style to do things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
119. Censure is warranted but it will be seen as a stunt by Feingold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsIt1984Yet
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 07:51 PM Response to Reply #119 |
125. Was his fillibuster attpemt a "stunt"? Or his lone vote against the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 11:58 PM Response to Reply #125 |
151. I am not putting him down for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 11:34 PM Response to Reply #119 |
149. Well, SOOOO freakin' what if it *IS* a "stunt"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
124. thank you skinner for saying what needs to be said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
127. At worst, it will bring attention to the fact that Bush needs censure..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathappened
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
133. this man is a lone man in the struggle to make things right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
134. thank you to russ for doing the right thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
135. There's an up side to your down side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
138. One great thing is that Russ pierced the bubble...threw the grenade... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourout
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
140. The beltway Dems do not understand... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
142. Let's suppose I am a bank robber, and I have robbing a lot of banks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Herman47
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
143. Feingold shouldn't have to consult Democrats beforehand... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
145. I wish, for once, they would find the bravery to do the right thing- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kena1956
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
146. Russ is a hero |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lochloosa
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
147. Skinner, I listened to Rush today and I think he read your post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
148. Sen. Reid told Ed Schultz yesterday that he supported Feingold's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 04:16 PM Response to Reply #148 |
172. the hearing theory sounds solid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2
![]() |
Tue Mar-14-06 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
150. "the risk of "appearing weak"" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
153. That's very rational. But I'm sick of spineless Dems. I want someone to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Higans
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
154. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stockholm
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 03:12 AM Response to Original message |
155. True but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumpel
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 03:17 AM Response to Original message |
156. But I still hope he get's the support. Let's write/call the Senators again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StraightShooter
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 04:10 AM Response to Original message |
157. Censure IS NOT IMPEACHMENT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paul Dlugokencky
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 06:05 AM Response to Reply #157 |
160. DITHERING DEMS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 07:31 AM Response to Reply #157 |
161. I'd much prefer he be impeached too but ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deutsey
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
162. Whether it's "half-assed" on Feingold's part, cowardice on the Dems' part, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oc2002
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
163. Bush does not know what Censure is anyway...he thinks its a new Beer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
confludemocrat
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
166. How much more "keep our powder dry" BS are we supposed to endure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
167. Oh, well. There's always the next election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVK
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
168. He called everyone's bluff on both sides of the aisle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brainshrub
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
169. Opposition party in name only. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
170. No mixed feelings here ... GEAUX FEINGOLD!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humbled_opinion
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
173. Exactly what a real Democrat Senator... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trevelyan
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
174. Robert Parry weighs in on the immolation of Feingold.: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blutodog
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 08:00 PM Response to Reply #174 |
176. Mixed Feelings? HELL NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carni
![]() |
Wed Mar-15-06 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
178. What I don't like and maybe I am stupid--why not IMPEACHMENT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 01:38 PM Response to Reply #178 |
181. Here ya go: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carni
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 04:55 PM Response to Reply #181 |
182. Yes I read it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 08:20 PM Response to Reply #182 |
185. Money. That's the ultimate answer. Those who could are "haves" that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voltaire99
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
179. Stop worrying, Skinner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Mar-18-06 03:32 PM Response to Reply #179 |
186. Gosh, can you enlighten us with your obviously intellectually superior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hidden Stillness
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
183. Feingold Speech A Disappointment to Me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
184. Doesn't voting for censure now pretty much forestall Impeachment later? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Sat Mar-18-06 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
187. Censure NOW! -- impeachment after November...! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC