|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
NYCGirl
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 11:40 AM Original message |
Now THIS is going to be an AMAZING MOVIE! (from Richard Clarke's book) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
1. Clarke's next books/movie should be about Cyber-Terrorism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moodforaday
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
2. You trust Clarke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rude Horner
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 12:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. I trust Clarke a lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moodforaday
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 12:50 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. He gives credence to the official version of events |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renate
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
3. I don't speak Hollywood-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katherine Brengle
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
4. I hope the movie is better than the book- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
5. Also, Anthony Hopkins needs to play Clarke, not Tom Hanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nickster
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 12:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Absolutely, that would be a perfect fit. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
6. Why do they call it a novel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 11:53 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Oh, you are correct! Changed my own post to reflect that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. F*** Clarke. He's a big-time apologist and spinmeister now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monkey see Monkey Do
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
12. Paul "Scientologist" Haggis that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Mon Mar-20-06 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
13. Not sure about Clinton, but put in Salma Hayek as Sibel Edmonds... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 17th 2024, 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC