White House Does Not Deny Leak Claims

[Crazy Guggenheim]

Yeah big deal. Sounds like old news.

:popcorn:


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-leak8apr08,0,1668626.story?coll=la-home-headlines

[northofdenali]

1. Why bother to deny it?

They're above the law anyway, right? :hi: Crazy.

[Crazy Guggenheim]

2. Hey how are you?

:popcorn:

[northofdenali]

3. Warmin' up, CG, it's 36 above -

HEAT WAVE!!!!!!!!!

[Crazy Guggenheim]

4. Oh!! How much light and dark is there right now? BTW, did you vote

in DW's Brazilian Joke Contest?

http://www.democraticwarrior.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=612

[northofdenali]

5. Yup, I voted - haven't laughed so hard in months!

Actual Time: 6:44 AM AKDT 9:03 PM AKDT
Civil Twilight: 5:51 AM AKDT 9:56 PM AKDT

We're looking at about 14 hours daylight right now. Still haven't figured out why Alaska goes on Daylight Savings Time....... unless we could save it up for winter! :P

[rodeodance]

6. Last two paragraphs are interesting also.

....Also Friday, McClellan waved off repeated questions about the apparent 10-day gap between the days in 2003 that Bush authorized the Libby leak to Miller and the day the White House released the document publicly. Legal scholars contend that by authorizing the leak on July 8, 2003, Bush's action was tantamount to an official declassification. But McClellan told reporters July 18 that "this information was just, as of today, officially declassified."

The discrepancy suggests that Bush authorized the leak before his senior intelligence aides and advisors fully concluded that its release would not violate national security.