|
We'll grant that Jesus took over Mithras' birthday, no argument. But the original Jesus story suggests birth in spring, not winter as there are shepherds out with their lambs which they wouldn't be unless lambs were birthing in spring. The birthday was actually argued about once the church was established, not created when the stars in Orion's belt would work as the "star" of the wise men. It was actually much more simple for the church to deliberately (and they did do it deliberately) take over Mithras' birthday. Christianity would do this over and over again--take a popular pagan holiday that the locals refused to give up and make it a feast day, or take a popular pagan god that the locals would not give up and make them saint or devil. Mithras' Birthday which also falls around the time of the popular Roman festival Saturnalia, and Winter Solstice. Three birds with one stone. The pagans keep their holiday but worship Jesus during it. Win-Win.
Next, if you try to argue Mithras with Christians they'll tell you he was actually born out of an egg not in a manger. Mithras myth has different origins, so be careful using that one. Of course, Horus born to Isis follows the Jesus birth myth pretty well, with her on the run and giving birth to him hidden in a cave. Likewise, the sacrificial god who dies so that everyone else can live is a very old myth. You can go back to Innana, a goddess who visits the land of the dead, is killed, hangs from a hook for three days and is resurrected. Prometheus sacrifices himself to give man fire, etc. Even the Mayans, I believe had such a myth with a corn god who sacrifices himself for his starving people. In short, in certain cases it was quite easy to swap out the pagan god for Jesus as the myth was pretty much the same.
As for the cross, it certainly helped that Romans did, indeed, crucify people, as the Jewish cult that was waiting for the Messiah to save them from Roman oppression could easily use this as a viable way of how their leader died--whether that really happened or not. Once again, the popularity of the cross makes it easy to switch out Jesus with local pagan gods using that emblem.
The problem, Zeitgeist, is that none of this is going to convince or convert anyone who is one of the faithful, as the argument always is that you must believe out of faith, not because of evidence. Contrary facts are god's test to see if you really believe, right? So as interesting as some of these points may be--though flawed in cases--they won't make any difference to most Christians.
|