SurfingScientist
(237 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-16-09 08:39 AM
Original message |
ChazII
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-16-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message |
SurfingScientist
(237 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-16-09 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Now, how do I get all that coffee off my laptop screen...? :spray:
|
indimuse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-16-09 08:58 AM
Response to Original message |
|
So does his adorable *smirk*...lol!:kick:NR!
|
lakercub
(509 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-16-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Every word he said in the first six minutes |
|
had a double meaning. Absolutely fabulous.
|
FightingIrish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-16-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. I picked up all these gems. What did I miss? |
|
“This story is hard to swallow” “Teabaggers Go Nuts” El Cajon, Sag Harbor et al Teabaggers mount protest “The teabagging exploded” “..still considering what to do with the load” “It’s hard to change position while you’re teabagging” “Climaxed at that grass root organization” “ a vas deferens from today’s turnout” “tea baggers don’t want earmarks” “high taxes have brought them to their knees” “Dick Arm(e)y” Phallic Florida Capitol Building “Phallusy”
|
Amonester
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-16-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |
| 6. "socialism is incorrect change" but they were all for... |
|
"socialism" when their party implemented "socialism for the richest 2% at the expense of everybody else down to their grandchildren and then some" for 8 years.
So "socialism for the richest only" is okay for these crackpots, as long as it's THEIR party doing it!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Feb 14th 2026, 06:27 PM
Response to Original message |