Ron Paul Agrees, Bush And Cheney Should Be Investigated

[Reform]

Run time: 08:40 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6etSBfKABZM   Posted on YouTube: April 22, 2009 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: April 22, 2009 By DU Member: Reform Views on DU: 996

 
If you would just like to skip to where he says this it starts at 2:45
every voice helps right now

[jobycom]

1. Yea. The man who says that African America children are exceptionally

fast and skilled thieves and believes they should be tried as adults younger than white kids thinks Bush and Cheney should be investigated.

He can fuck himself, even if he wants to ride the coattails of those of us who got it right. We don't need his support.

[Reform]

2. dont be so devisive

where is this Paul quote derived from?
Not being confrontational, would just like to see this quote that just made you type a rabid mad post

[pauldg0]

3. I agree with you.....

...that respondent is a bit rabid. I have not ever heard that about Ron Paul....."Produce the evidence".

[elleng]

4. and defamatory?

.

[jobycom]

6. Google, it's widely known.

He had several racist quotes of about that same mentality in a newsletter he wrote the first time he was in Congress, and has been reported on all the major networks and many papers. Paul now denies he wrote it, even though it was his newsletter and his name was signed to it, the quotes appeared over a year's worth of publications, he had plenty of opportunities over a year's time to halt publication if he so strongly disagreed with the sentiment, and it took him a decade or more to finally deny writing it. His denial, too, changed from "I hired someone who took liberties with my name," to "I have no idea who wrote it."

[Sebastian Doyle]

5. If there was a "bipartisan" House investigation into the Bush Crime Family

Ron Paul is one of the few 'Pukes I'd trust to be on it. Because I'm 100% sure he'd take it seriously. And I'm sad to say that I couldn't say that about a lot of so-called "Democrats" (i.e. the Jane Harmon types who are complicit in the crimes of those bastards)

Doesn't mean I like the guy or I'd ever vote for him, but in this role, he'd be my first choice for the Republican side.

Dennis would be #1 for the Democrats, of course.

[jobycom]

7. You lie down with dogs, you wake up the mange. nt

[Sebastian Doyle]

8. Which is exactly why we can't trust the DLC/BlueBalls/AIPAC crowd to do this.

And while Ron Paul certainly has his faults, at least I know he's on the correct side of the issues that would be in question in these investigations, should they ever occur.

I wouldn't appoint him to a Health Care commission or pretty much anything else domestic though.

[jobycom]

9. If you would side with Ron Paul over the DLC, there's a problem.

This guy is on the right side of one issue, by accident. He is vile in every other way. The DLC is a lot closer to liberal than Paul will ever be--not that that's high praise.

[Sebastian Doyle]

10. On this issue I would

Because the DLC went out of their way to appease and actively promote the Bush Crime Family/PNAC agenda for the last 8 years. Ron Paul frequently spoke out against it. Who then is more likely to be interested in truly investigating these crimes?

Like I said, the man is no saint, and I'd never vote for him, even if I lived in Texas. But you cannot trust those who enabled the Chimp to prosecute the son of a bitch.