Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich on Freedom Watch

[Charleston Chew]

Run time: 12:01 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Il2PFKKGik   Posted on YouTube: April 03, 2011 By YouTube Member: Geddy008 Views on YouTube: 90   Posted on DU: April 04, 2011 By DU Member: Charleston Chew Views on DU: 1238

 
Ron Paul, Denis Kucinich discuss the truth about Obama and his illegal war on Libya. The president doesn't answer to the UN, he answers to congress and "we the people".

FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

[FeelingBlue]

1. Ron Paul's presence

as a stealthy "Christian" Reconstructionist is only a distraction here. My understanding is that the Senate passed, by unanimous consent, their support for action in Libya. For either Paul, who is a Reconstructionist, and Kucinich to imply otherwise, is false. I am not saying I support the action. But, the truth stands that the Senate, Dems and Repubs granted full support without a single dissenter.

[JDPriestly]

4. A vote in the Senate is a half-measure.

Congress has two houses. The Constitution is not satisfied with a vote in the Senate on this kind of issue.

[howaboutme]

2. I only watch Freedom Watch if someone posts a video link

but I like what was said here about our loss of freedoms being slowly eroded by a Congress that refuses to stand up for its rights.

I may have to record it when I determine when it is on. I like it because it focuses on abuse by the establishment of which is normally covered up.

Whether we are talking Bush or Obama the imperial presidency is not good for our freedom. The real destructive trend began when Pelosi took impeachment of Bush off the table just as Bill Moyers said it would. It set a bad precedent that moved the bar in a bad direction and that subsequent Presidents would abuse power. I'd like to know why impeachment was taken off the table and who actually wanted the possibility removed. My gut feeling tells me it was about those not wanting 9-11 or the Iraq War investigation opened up.

The Federal Reserve giving 3.3 trillion of our dollars to banks and other entities around the world is an outrage. I agree with Paul and Kucinich that the Fed needs reigned in and removed from the executive branch.

[Charleston Chew]

3. I only catch it on-line

Judge Napolitono addresses some serious issues.

[truedelphi]

5. Kucinich states that the real problem is that the

Printing of the money, (or Quantitative Easing as slimeball Bernnake refers to it) - the real problem is "That it hasn't been done to create jobs, but to give profits and wealth to a few,
and this poses real problems for our democracy."

And who has allowed this to happen? Both Bush and Obama are in on it, or else they are ignorant of it, so neither has served the needs of this nation.

[The Doctor.]

6. I like Kucinich.

Hell... I can even like Paul.

They agree on one brand of absolutism. It's hard to find fault with their attitudes.

[pam4water]

7. I thought it was 9 Trillion?

[howaboutme]

8. Have you read Matt Taibi's - Griftopia.....

http://www.amazon.com/Griftopia-Machines-Vampire-Breaking-America/dp/0385529953 I'm not finished yet. He trashes Allan Greenspan and his policies. I like his writing style. It removes any doubt that the Fed Reserve was set up to benefit the banking elite , not the USA, and it has served that purpose very well at our expense.

[Charleston Chew]

9. Sam Seder on Alan Greenspan's Financial Times OpEd

Apr 1, 2011

Sam Seder discusses Alan Greenspan's OpEd piece from the Financial Times.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x569948

[spooked911]

10. this was an awesome segment-- bipartisanship I can believe in

they nailed every point, imo