|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
dEMOK
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:05 AM Original message |
(opinion) JFK Assassinated - Why?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
1. Because some one or ones wanted him dead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwenos
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
2. Leading Candidates for Motive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Racism. a la KKK, killing civil rights workers, MLK , and RFK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwenos
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:33 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Executive Action |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnorman
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 02:32 AM Response to Reply #7 |
25. I recall seeing that film some time back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 11:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
122. They'd love to you believe that. In fact, 1- 4 in #2 were the reasons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 02:03 AM Response to Reply #2 |
19. Ah, someone else who has read "Miami." Have you read "The Last Thing He Wanted"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 11:46 AM Response to Reply #19 |
70. I read it, and yes, it's scary. Haven't read Miami, though... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 02:53 AM Response to Reply #2 |
27. Pass the Occam and don't spare the Razors, but you forgot one theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 06:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
40. You can add... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hangingon
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 05:16 PM Response to Reply #40 |
80. There is also the theory that John Connally was the target. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 06:09 PM Response to Reply #80 |
87. Yes...that one came out when some of the others didn't seem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hangingon
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 06:45 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. I like your analogy but I think Oswald probably was the shooter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 08:21 PM Response to Reply #89 |
100. If you get the chance...watch the video of the Press Conference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hangingon
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 08:47 PM Response to Reply #100 |
104. I have seen the press conference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 09:47 PM Response to Reply #104 |
108. Maybe your G'Children will be spared all of the speculation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dEMOK
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 02:34 AM Response to Reply #104 |
118. You have posted no facts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #2 |
51. Mental Illness, Delusional Thinking, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, aka |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otherlander
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:34 AM Response to Reply #2 |
58. It seems like it could be a combination of those. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #58 |
123. I think it was meant as a joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otherlander
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 09:04 PM Response to Reply #123 |
136. Sometimes it's hard to tell around here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Mon Jun-04-07 07:09 AM Response to Reply #136 |
139. Or that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #2 |
59. Considering Johnson escalated the war mere days after taking over.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnnieBW
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
112. I vote for #2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
3. I honestly can't guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt-60
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:17 AM Response to Original message |
4. My grandmother always said LBJ killed him to get his job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:59 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. and to funnel cash to his Texas backers, KBR / Halliburton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:22 AM Response to Original message |
6. K&R for quality, and good ears. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dEMOK
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:44 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Thanks Man... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
9. Most presidents have had attempts on their lives, only some succeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dEMOK
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:50 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. This Doesn't Answer my Question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itcfish
![]() |
Mon Jun-04-07 08:26 AM Response to Reply #11 |
141. I Believe He Was Killed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 05:54 AM Response to Reply #9 |
36. I'm surprised we haven't heard more about what I'm sure were the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
10. Oswald shot Kennedy because he could. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dEMOK
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:54 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. At least you answered my question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasProgresive
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 06:03 AM Response to Reply #10 |
37. How was Oswald able to shoot Kennedy with that pathetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:24 AM Response to Reply #37 |
55. Black Swan theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 11:03 AM Response to Reply #37 |
64. 1 out of 3 shots inside 100 yards for a scoped rifle is actually pretty bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. For a moving target? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasProgresive
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. And don't forget the scope was not properly sighted in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 04:06 PM Response to Reply #67 |
76. There also was a tree in the way of the alleged 'sniper's nest.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 06:55 PM Response to Reply #66 |
92. For a military trained marksman that is easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #66 |
134. 10 MPH from an elevated position at that range is not really a moving target |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 08:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
102. Bugliosi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KT2000
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:52 AM Response to Original message |
12. We are the same age! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dEMOK
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 02:06 AM Response to Reply #12 |
21. KT2000... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
14. Crazy Lee Oswald, delusions of grandeur... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Awsi Dooger
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 03:43 AM Response to Reply #14 |
30. Bingo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 08:59 AM Response to Reply #14 |
45. Please explain Jack Ruby |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #45 |
53. Here ya go: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #53 |
69. If Ruby was 'low-level mafia,' why did he know Oswald was 'Fair Play for Cuba Committee'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #69 |
74. Because his buddies were cops? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. Respectfully disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #78 |
96. OJ killed Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 11:36 PM Response to Reply #96 |
116. While the case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pilar007
![]() |
Mon Jun-04-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #78 |
146. The grassy knoll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #74 |
82. How did THEY know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 05:48 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. "The facts indicate there was a rush to paint a picture of Oswald" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #84 |
101. Here's a guy the CIA told the Warren Commission was OSWALD... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 09:35 PM Response to Reply #101 |
107. Looks a lot more like Jack Ruby than LHO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jun-04-07 06:15 AM Response to Reply #107 |
137. Oswald in Mexico City |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:17 PM Response to Reply #101 |
113. Oy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jun-04-07 06:21 AM Response to Reply #113 |
138. Another big coincidence - LBJ and Hoover's discussion of Mexico City erased... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:13 PM Response to Reply #53 |
71. Interesting, but consider a few things here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 11:17 PM Response to Reply #71 |
115. That's a loooooong post there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 07:28 PM Response to Reply #45 |
94. Bingo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
15. "LBJ, the candidate from Halliburton." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 02:06 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Here we go: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dEMOK
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 02:49 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. WOW !!!... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dEMOK
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 02:55 AM Response to Reply #20 |
28. Brilliant Post,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 11:30 AM Response to Reply #20 |
126. Now will you mutts who question the sense in abolishing Presidential pardons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:58 AM Response to Original message |
16. A) Actually wanted the President to be the goddamned President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 06:09 AM Response to Reply #16 |
39. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:58 AM Response to Original message |
17. He may have upset a few people with this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 02:24 AM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Huh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azurnoir
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 02:13 AM Response to Original message |
22. The CIA was a magor suspect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 02:20 AM Response to Original message |
23. He double crossed the mob. Nobody double crosses the mob. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 03:00 AM Response to Reply #23 |
29. "Occam-wise", the mob needed inside help. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 03:56 AM Response to Original message |
31. The wildest theory I ever heard was that JFK had to be taken out because he'd "turned on" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 05:50 AM Response to Reply #31 |
35. WHAT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 07:29 PM Response to Reply #35 |
95. Consider though -- if he had, that probably would be the "system's" response... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qdemn7
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 04:09 AM Response to Original message |
32. Revenge...is the common reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dEMOK
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 05:25 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Who Wanted Revenge??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dEMOK
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 05:31 AM Response to Original message |
34. Please speak... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 06:06 AM Response to Original message |
38. The scene |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hangingon
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #38 |
81. I am always amazed that people take Oliver Stone as a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. Good for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hangingon
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 05:57 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. Yep. I've been around conspiracy wackos for a long time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 07:05 PM Response to Reply #86 |
93. I don't doubt it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
41. Without having the responses to this post yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qdemn7
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 07:37 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. I guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 09:29 AM Response to Reply #43 |
48. Executive Order 11110 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qdemn7
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #48 |
73. Thanks for the links n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itcfish
![]() |
Mon Jun-04-07 08:39 AM Response to Reply #41 |
143. I am With You |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cureautismnow
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
42. Oswald Speaks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zippy890
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 05:50 PM Response to Reply #42 |
85. Oswald : " I am just a patsy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
44. The JFK Assassination - A False Mystery Concealing State Crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbins
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 09:22 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Motive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. We Know the Truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peggy Day
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 08:07 PM Response to Reply #49 |
97. This country has never been the same. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:11 PM Response to Reply #97 |
111. Echoes in Iraq: Lyndon Johnson and Vietnam, 1964 (Editor & Publisher) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
47. Easy, people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
50. I found who I always look for on these threads: Octafish and H2OMan! ...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:42 AM Response to Reply #50 |
61. The Assassination of John F. Kennedy as Coup D'Etat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:51 AM Response to Reply #61 |
63. I tend to think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #63 |
65. Explains our current circumstances with Congress's unwillingness to stop the Iraq War... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #63 |
105. Your father was a wise man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 08:11 AM Response to Reply #105 |
119. Though he was not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 09:06 AM Response to Reply #119 |
121. And I would imagine every President since has heard that echo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Retired AF Dem
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
52. My two thoughts are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
54. He was going to let the Arabs control their own oil... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
56. He was going to blow the lid off the military industrial complex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #56 |
124. Do you have proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
57. He was an obstacle to the New World Order |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 08:11 PM Response to Reply #57 |
98. Ding-Ding....we have a winner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #57 |
125. Where is the evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kskiska
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
60. PBS Interview with Oswald's brother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
62. in essence, it was a coup by proxy by the rabid military-war profiteer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
68. A conspiracy of the Miami Crybabies, Mafia and the goddamn CIA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
72. Watch this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #72 |
77. I'm 30 minutes in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 05:11 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. The best part is the last half!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #79 |
90. that is proving true!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #90 |
131. one, single name that can be directly linked to the Third Reich, the US military industrial complex, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jun-04-07 08:10 AM Response to Reply #131 |
140. Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itcfish
![]() |
Mon Jun-04-07 08:58 AM Response to Reply #72 |
145. I Can't Open The |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Mon Jun-04-07 09:49 AM Response to Reply #145 |
147. Here is the title |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
75. He was leaning towards pulling troops OUT of Vietnam. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:03 PM Response to Reply #75 |
110. JFK signed orders getting US out of Vietnam... NSAM 263. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemSoccerMom
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
88. As someone born in the 70s, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 08:40 PM Response to Reply #88 |
103. I too was born in the 70s and fascinated by his assassination - the single bullet theory is ridiculo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
91. Because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Mon Jun-04-07 08:58 AM Response to Reply #91 |
144. as were John Hinkley, John Wilkes Booth and Charlie Giteau |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Speck Tater
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
99. JFK's dad's Mafia ties. JFK was supposed to delivery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redneck Socialist
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
106. He had Marilyn Monroe knocked off... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
109. Too many reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Sat Jun-02-07 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
114. Money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
117. I guess Booby and Jackie were "Conspiracy Nuts" too. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 02:53 PM Response to Reply #117 |
132. You got that right. "Let them see what they've done" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost4words
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
120. One word POWER! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cgrindley
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
127. Please delete this stupid thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 12:29 PM Response to Reply #127 |
128. That's what J Edgar Hoover and Allen Dulles would want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itcfish
![]() |
Mon Jun-04-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #128 |
148. Ya Think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jun-04-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #148 |
149. I Know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #127 |
129. silly n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl
![]() |
Mon Jun-04-07 08:31 AM Response to Reply #127 |
142. I heard Oswald hung his laundry in his yard to dry - what more proof do you need? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
130. Here's a guy to ask: Poppy Bush was in Dallas on 22 November 1963. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
133. So the Dead Kennedys would have a cool band name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BornagainDUer
![]() |
Sun Jun-03-07 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
135. Allen Dulles and the Mafia killed him for the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Sep 20th 2024, 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC