|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 08:20 PM Original message |
I like Nancy Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. What you said. It's time, Nancy. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. Past time. Nancy, set the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. Agree. She was the wrong person for the job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 08:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I don't think so. The job is just a mofo. And we need to keep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 08:31 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I don't believe that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. I think she is a better judge of what she is able to do, in this instance, than we are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 09:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. what tripe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. Feingold had the heat; which the DLC fears -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. She has no choice. It's her duty to impeach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 09:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. the Speaker of the House has no say in an impeachment or similar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 09:20 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Obviously she has a say in it, but she also has a duty under |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye
![]() |
Sun Jul-15-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
25. do you really think that most Americans would agree that Bush should be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
![]() |
Sun Jul-15-07 06:34 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Maybe I'm too optimistic but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. I think she knew impeachment had to come from the people. Her test. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 09:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 09:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. I think you're exactly right. I think Nancy is an extremely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 09:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I still believe it, even if the Ken Starr episode was an inside job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 09:41 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Ken Starr must have a very interesting client list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
8. I agree n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Time for change
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
9. Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
17. She was elected, and she can say whatever the hell she wants. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Elections have consequences |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. we are ALL answerable to ourselves first and foremost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
21. When you take something off the table you can put it back on later. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. It was taken "off" to aid and comfort Bush -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Sat Jul-14-07 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
22. Well said. I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Sun Jul-15-07 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
27. I don't like her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Sun Jul-15-07 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
28. We really need Howard Dean to make the case for impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed
![]() |
Sun Jul-15-07 06:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. The least she could now is sign on to the Cheney Impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit
![]() |
Sun Jul-15-07 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
30. Truthfully, my friend HWNN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marlakay
![]() |
Sun Jul-15-07 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
31. You guys are forgetting they were going to give it to the DLC guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clixtox
![]() |
Sun Jul-15-07 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
32. Too Many Democrats, Including Pelosi... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4
![]() |
Sun Jul-15-07 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
33. Word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Sun Jul-15-07 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
34. Cindy Sheehan On CNN just gave Pelosi until 7/23/07 to put it back on the table or she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Sun Jul-15-07 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
35. Nice to see you buying into the RW tripe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Sun Jul-15-07 08:11 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. nothing that directly implicates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC