|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Kadie
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:03 PM Original message |
Pelosi promises congressional contempt charge for Harriet Miers (& impeachment not on agenda) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greeby
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not your agenda, maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me.
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. It Isn't Her Place To Declare Anything Off The Table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. "I hear it across the board across the country." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
4. It's not that the people WANT him to be impeached, he deserves it, if we follow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
6. Contempt is a start. Maybe that will lead to impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
7. It's not just about the war Madame Speaker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I have no answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:53 PM Response to Reply #7 |
20. Perfect!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
9. Why contempt of congress, and not inherent contempt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. I think she wants to make them actually refuse to serve the subpoenas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. because going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:10 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Bullshit it is meaningless and weightless and you know it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:13 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Of course it's preferable, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:15 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. "Going through the courts is always preferable." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. the opening gambit needs to be played with high stakes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. voting a charge of contempt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:52 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Why do you keep using synonyms for childish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 12:04 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 02:27 AM Response to Reply #42 |
57. Ok let me use two small words that you might not understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 09:49 AM Response to Reply #38 |
65. Cause He's Rational And Perceptive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:57 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. Do you know how I know when someone who posts here is working for them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 12:06 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. who is that I'm working for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 12:29 AM Response to Reply #43 |
48. It is not that we disagree, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 12:38 AM Response to Reply #48 |
50. it's all a matter of perspective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 01:58 AM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Interesting choice of words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:35 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. If Pelosi ever changed her mind about her positions, would you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. I imagine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:54 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. You mean an assured conviction in the Senate before the process, I gather. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 01:23 AM Response to Reply #39 |
51. How about a reasonable chance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 08:49 AM Response to Reply #51 |
61. I do not believe the Speaker of the House is polling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 09:36 AM Response to Reply #51 |
63. Also, why doesn't she use that same principle concerning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:48 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. The thing is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #37 |
45. Why say it's off the table in the first place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:38 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Bush** Has Already Said The Justice Department Will Ignore Contempt of Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:55 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. So Monkey butt says we should play that game and test it in the courts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 12:12 AM Response to Reply #40 |
44. About 5 Minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. No they could play with it as long as it takes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 08:43 AM Response to Reply #46 |
60. Because That Will End Up in the USSC Too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 06:03 AM Response to Reply #29 |
59. "Thank god Congress isn't populated by petulant children." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
10. Very interesting, "impeaching Bush" does not address HR 333 which is about Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
11. Worthless. We're in a street fight with the Neocons and she wants to play fair. SCREW THAT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:39 PM Response to Reply #11 |
34. Spell It Out. We are In a Street Fight, Empty Handed. They're NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whoa_Nelly
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
13. Gosh, Madam Speaker! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. What she ^ said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
14. The question should be does she think bush has violated the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:37 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. See, to me, that's the correct answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Where in the constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
16. Pathetic So what will the speaker say when the executive branch declares marshal law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
32. A Declaration of Martial Law Is the Most Likely Response by the Regime to Impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
18. Hey Nancy listen to your constituents!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
partylessinOhio
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
19. Madame Squeaker, I don't know how you keep a straight face |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
23. "I'm not unsympathetic to the concern people have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Sat Jul-21-07 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
28. Over the war? How about all the other illegal shit he's done? If Pelosi doesn't support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
47. Nancy, you don't need to impeach Bush based on the Iraq war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
49. We might be better served if the Speaker were silent on the issue of impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 05:35 AM Response to Reply #49 |
58. She would only have to be President for 1 year or so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Land Shark
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 02:03 AM Response to Original message |
53. Conyers says 3 more reps and he will FILE impeachment w/ or w/o Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #53 |
64. BUT...can Conyers do this on his own Without Nancy's Approval... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
54. Ms. Pelosi - Did you, or did you not , take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 02:23 AM Response to Original message |
55. Madame Speaker should I remind you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 02:25 AM Response to Original message |
56. Oh and I am being remiss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos
![]() |
Sun Jul-22-07 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
62. What a leader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC