|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
kpete
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 11:54 AM Original message |
So WHAT IS IT? Inherent Contempt Or Statutory Contempt- DAMN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill219
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
1. I so hope that this is true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
2. OH PLEASE OH PLEASE OH PLEASE OH PLEASE OH PLEASE OH PLEASE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
3. Please say it is so! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. That link is to Daily Kos. What gives? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kpete
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. The guy who answered the phone confirmed that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Holy shit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. They can cuff them to heavy furniture or banisters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. It IS a pretty picture isn't it..... .n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
33. Oh, I dunno. I could get into a little bondage & discipline for the junta flunkies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
37. Or 'cuff them in groups of six... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wayupnorth
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
32. Holding facility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. Frog March! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
9. Who is this commenter Gioele? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kpete
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:07 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
28. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
12. Still just a maybe, but this is better news than I expected today!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emlev
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
14. Where's the best basic explanation of inherent contempt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. Wikipedia, for starters n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
39. Here's a primer ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
15. EDIT- sorry to hear it now. What a disappointment. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'm so holding my breath. color me jaded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:21 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. I'm not sure about holding it. But something stopped for a second. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. You're not the only one who's jaded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
17. WOOHOO!!!!!! YES! YES! YES!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wundermaus
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
18. The Fascists will not stand for Justice... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blaze Diem
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. My thoughts exactly...Bush has already prepared for this possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
19. Yes!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
20. Doin' the HAPPY DANCE!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
22. this regime's ignorance towards the law, will bite them on the ass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
24. HOT DAMN bush can't fluff this one off he has absolutely positively |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
26. Even if it's just statutory contempt, they can always pull out the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
27. Called and told the nice young man that I wanted to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Do you have Conyer's phone number? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 01:24 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. I called the # for the Judiciary Committee, which is: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
31. It's Possible The Dems Are PURPOSELY Sending Mixed Signals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. so this is like a congressional CT? ;) LOL nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Actually, It's Just Politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
38. I was excited on Saturday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Mon Jul-23-07 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
41. Isn't Statutory contempt better to start with? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC