|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 12:16 PM Original message |
Is a public official supposed to engage in partisan politics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
evlbstrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. Smells fishy to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 12:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. This sure seems to move beyond supporting and administering existing programs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. He's lying. There's no way they're going to include "millions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vilis Veritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
4. Seems apparent to me that his is not only partisan but off the boat... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
5. Here's a NYTs article from 7/22, respectable health reporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. Text of the bill is here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
7. Yeah, maybe a Hatch Act violation but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. How much time will it take to complain about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Very little time to complain, but don't get your hopes up for removal of this guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Gee.Thanks for doing your part in throwing cold water on activism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Your reply's first part is a misinterpretation of what I wrote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. It is not an either/or situation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Well sorry then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 03:24 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. I'm sorry also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Understood, no hard feelings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
8. No, he shouldn't be doing that even if he WASN'T lying about it, which he is. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 01:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. What in your opinion is the best way to find out if this fax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. This guy Fred Schuster is not very active in Google |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 02:33 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. It won't be him, it will be the text of this fax that they were sent -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. I searched for it two ways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
9. umm.. was he appointed by the WH??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
10. yup--he is a bush appointee---- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
12. If it's not from or with federal property |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 01:39 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. So, explain to me again why the whole WH crew isn't in jail? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Seems more like he is promoting legislation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. Remember the Head Start controversy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Yes I do remember but I don't see those as the same as this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 05:14 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. He's speaking out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
19. Is he a bush appointee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
24. why not just respond to his lies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Great research - thanks!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. Uninsured college grads? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nealmhughes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
34. Now, were I president, I would tell him to keep his yap shut and only discuss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 15th 2024, 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC