|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 12:40 AM Original message |
Congress should ask Mrs. Ashcroft to testify about the hospital room scene. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
1. Uh.. spousal privilege? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lindsey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I wish she'd come forward but she very well could have an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lindsey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:12 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Kagumesha: you said it'd be "pretty lousy politics." Have you been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:47 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Yeah, I have. And being seen to beat up on vulnerable women backfires. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:56 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Why would that be beating up on her? Her husband did nothing wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. How would she be testifying against her husband, if Congress asked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:26 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. She wouldn't. As you know, her husband was the victim, not the miscreant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. That is my thought, also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Is everyone getting collective amnesia that Mr. Ashcroft is a committed Republican? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:58 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Why do you think Mrs. Ashcroft would want to protect the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 02:00 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. My post was in reference to MRS. Ashcroft testifying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 02:07 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. That's in the past to her now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 02:11 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Whatever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 10:50 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. No reason for them not to ask her. And they certainly could make her, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 11:08 AM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Wait. Now she is a stonewalling partisan hack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. That's what I was wondering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:31 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Exactly. I think Mrs. Ashcroft's testimony could be devastating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Doesn't apply AT ALL -- her husband didn't do anything wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Hmm, dragging a man's wife into a dispute..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:53 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Bush/Cheney dragged her into the dispute, when the decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
11. do it in private session |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 02:02 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Under oath, and before the entire committee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 02:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. John Asscroft did testify in a private meeting & confirmed what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 02:24 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. But she didn't do anything wrong. Gonzo and the other guy did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 10:55 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. She couldn't plead the 5th. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
26. The SJC is getting some rock-solid info from somewhere. Someone's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Yes! Let Mrs. Ashcroft be another Martha Mitchell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I'm thinking that she may already be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Sep 25th 2024, 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC