|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Gato Moteado
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:31 PM Original message |
does anyone here buy the magic bullet theory in the JFK murder? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
1. I think you mean "the pristine bullet" or "the single shooter"...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elspeth
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Or the "magic bullet" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. That too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 08:07 AM Response to Reply #7 |
74. How much are they askin' for it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gato Moteado
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. i meant magic bullet....sorry. i fixed it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. I still think Dr. Mudd was framed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. I think so, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. He was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
44. Octavian totally framed Brutus for Caesar's murder. Don't buy the magic dagger theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #44 |
170. LOL. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 08:25 AM Response to Reply #3 |
78. Do you think it was actually John Wilkes Boothe at Garrett farm.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #78 |
130. The dental records are inconclusive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananarepublican
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:44 AM Response to Reply #78 |
147. He lived happily ever after in Europe for at least another 12 years! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. I believe in Occam's Razor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr. Strange
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
30. Ouch! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
5. Only because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebenaube
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. too funny... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. I will resist trying to help you read the information. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
95. I read it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 01:59 PM Response to Reply #95 |
110. Here is something from a side link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #110 |
117. I saw that, and I call bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #117 |
123. Incorrect, but we should just stop I think. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 07:23 PM Response to Reply #123 |
133. Fine with me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananarepublican
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:47 AM Response to Reply #8 |
148. Man, the problem here is magic mushrooms, not bullets! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
35. Thanks for posting this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
6. I intentionally don't know enough about it to say. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamahaingttta
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
9. Of course not! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
12. It was magic because it could move at right angles. What about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tetedur
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 08:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. The bullet on the guerney WAS the magic bullet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Nuts. I misspelled guerney. Anyway, I thought the guerney bullet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lint Head
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
14. Regardless what you believe there were people that were glad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
48. My Crazy Mother... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:19 AM Response to Reply #48 |
156. Oh. My. Gawd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:43 AM Response to Reply #156 |
175. Now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:12 PM Response to Reply #175 |
177. you seem to have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
15. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
16. Only America has lone nuts and damaged buildings that fall at free-fall speed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 10:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. And enemies who hate us for our freedoms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananarepublican
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:51 AM Response to Reply #16 |
149. Why, it's a veritable 'through the looking-glass wonderland'! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
17. Nothing magic about it - the trajectory has been adequately explained |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Wound in right shoulder was DOWNWARD AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. And probably a good time to remind you all that 'OSWALD WAS EMPLOYED BY THE CIA . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 05:03 PM Response to Reply #25 |
129. Yeah, and what happened to that thread from yesterday? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananarepublican
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:55 AM Response to Reply #25 |
150. Yep! He was sent to the USSR by American intelligence! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 09:16 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. AJNTSA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 12:19 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. The whole distrust anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 10:35 PM Response to Reply #28 |
60. Facts do change minds . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #60 |
131. Third, you have confirmation from French intelligence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 10:30 PM Response to Reply #26 |
59. Great debate -- !!! Any chance you want to elaborate -- ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cruzan
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
125. This photo shows an 18° bullet path + 6° compensation for position and tilt of camera = 24° |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
19. The bullet that magically appeared on an unused hospital gurney? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananarepublican
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:57 AM Response to Reply #19 |
151. Very likely delivered in person by Jack 'Capone gofer' Ruby! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50
![]() |
Tue Sep-04-07 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
20. There's Been A Spectre Over That Theory From The Start n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. You mean "Specter", I believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananarepublican
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:02 AM Response to Reply #20 |
152. 'Sphincter' would have been a much better surname for go along Arlen! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
29. Nope. When I first heard the theory I was 12, and even then my reaction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 02:50 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Maybe you should read the actual report instead of someone's sensationalistic summary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananarepublican
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:04 AM Response to Reply #31 |
153. Can I borrow your well thumbed copy of 'Case Closed' by Gerald Posner? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
32. NO. I always wonder what Ted Kennedy thinks about Arlen Specter and his involvement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Obviously TK is part of the Conspiracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananarepublican
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:13 AM Response to Reply #38 |
154. You mean like 'Chappaquiddick' (sp?) was an assassination attempt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 05:43 PM Response to Reply #154 |
172. That's been my understanding for some time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
33. No. Complete bullshit from beginning to end. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. The "pristine bullet" is not even close to pristine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 03:54 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. The cumulative weight of the 'pristine bullet', plus the frags in Connolly.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. The "and wherever else" kind of defeats your own objection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Um, no and stuff....the bullet GAINED weight... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 04:03 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. By including fragments that came from somewhere else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Hmmm...so it LOST fragements...and left a bloody great big chunk in Connolly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. That's not at all consistent with what I said, but if you want to believe in the Con have at it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Well, this shit actually *did* happen... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 05:14 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. I had to stop reading after your third sentence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 06:39 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. See post # 51 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 06:47 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. None of which in any way proves Oswald couldn't or more importantly didn't do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Oswald was a classic patsy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 08:33 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. A trained marksman firing a rifle 3 times, wtf is so hard to fathom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 11:52 PM Response to Reply #57 |
65. The guy wasn't very good with a rifle... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 03:59 AM Response to Reply #65 |
70. The tree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 08:21 AM Response to Reply #70 |
76. Bottom line: The guy couldn't do the shooting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 12:03 PM Response to Reply #76 |
90. What are your qualifications |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 01:24 PM Response to Reply #90 |
100. My qualifications don't enter into the discussion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 01:44 PM Response to Reply #100 |
105. sure they do. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 01:45 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. No, actually they don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 08:34 PM Response to Reply #100 |
137. If you're evaluating something you have no expertise in, your opinion is worthless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #65 |
121. The body shot is a miss, not a hit. Unless you want to posit Oswald switched point-of-aim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 08:20 AM Response to Reply #57 |
75. Only problem was Oswald was a shitty marksman.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 09:25 AM Response to Reply #75 |
80. He was a mediocre marksman in the Marine Corps, which doesn't prove... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #80 |
85. Rubbish... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #85 |
93. Hooey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 01:22 PM Response to Reply #93 |
99. What am I recycling? The fact that i have walked almost every inch of that area? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #99 |
112. Even a truly incompetent rifleman scores a bullseye now and then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 02:47 PM Response to Reply #112 |
115. And occasionally republicans manage to suppress the urge to assault young boys... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 02:53 PM Response to Reply #115 |
116. You guys are great at throwing out non-scalable negative descriptions of Oswald |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #116 |
118. What is it about the post below that don't you get? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. Still no empirically testable alternative theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #99 |
120. One of three inside 100 yards at a basically stationary target with a scope is poor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Hmm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 06:38 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Hmm indeed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 08:13 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. About the "pristine" bullet on the stretcher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 11:58 PM Response to Reply #56 |
66. I disagree; it's a convenient fiction to explain the inexplicable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 03:55 AM Response to Reply #66 |
69. So you are unimpressed with the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 10:49 AM Response to Reply #69 |
87. Tag... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 08:22 AM Response to Reply #56 |
77. How did it GAIN weight? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 09:27 AM Response to Reply #77 |
81. Minor errors handling the evidence could explain that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #81 |
84. Huh? The weight of the bullet, plus the fragments left behind in skulls.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #84 |
91. The so-called "pristine" bullet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #91 |
94. Facts won't sway the conspiracy devotees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 01:26 PM Response to Reply #91 |
102. So what made Kennedy's head explode? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #102 |
108. The brain was given to the Kennedy family |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 01:59 PM Response to Reply #108 |
111. It was? Are you sure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #108 |
113. And yet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #91 |
104. No, it wasn't supposed to be the head shot... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #104 |
107. You ignore clearly explained well researched facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #81 |
92. Minor errors like these? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #92 |
103. Don't go confusing them with facts and ommissions.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrogL
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 09:55 AM Response to Reply #46 |
168. You're obviosly not trained on a bolt-action rifle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananarepublican
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:14 AM Response to Reply #40 |
155. The fatal headshot was caused by a frangible (aka 'dumb-dumb') bullet. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
34. No. I've seen the movie--JFK was shot by at least two assassins...(nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 11:18 PM Response to Reply #34 |
63. The movie was fiction. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananarepublican
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:30 AM Response to Reply #63 |
157. There were three, possibly four/five, teams of two, sniper teams situated at the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
36. Oh, you mean the reasonable theory not based on BS conspiracy nuttiness? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 11:07 AM Response to Reply #36 |
88. Perfect description of the Pristine Bullet Theory! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #88 |
128. There is no pristine bullet. It's a lie, and you shamelessly propagate it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:40 AM Response to Reply #128 |
160. Oh, please. It's well-known short-hand for the "how did it get there?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:21 AM Response to Reply #160 |
174. Lost momentum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
47. no.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
54. Try, try, try to understaaaand... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
58. No, I don't buy it...and Arlen the Errand Boy is indeed a co-conspirator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
praeclarus
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
61. lone nut gunman, single bullet, is hogwash ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
62. The bullet traveled in a straight line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #62 |
124. Also, Oswald was shooting high sectional density FMJ ammunition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colorado Progressive
![]() |
Wed Sep-05-07 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
64. No, because Seinfeld made fun of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WileEcoyote
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
67. Kennedy's Lincoln Continental took shots into the front window |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
68. I think that you perpetuate a myth by calling it the "magic bullet" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #68 |
97. Thank you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cgrindley
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 04:38 AM Response to Original message |
71. Have you ever actually shot a gun? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thothmes
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 07:35 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. 30-06 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 09:28 AM Response to Reply #72 |
82. Ouch - Oh wait, I read that wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #71 |
86. Bollocks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #86 |
122. Who said he was a good shot? He missed twice inside 100 yards with a scope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #122 |
126. #2 nd #3 were much closer to each IN TIMING.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
73. My biggest problem with it was the way a trained SS agent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #73 |
89. Here's the dealey-o: NOBODY KNEW there would be a FILM! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #89 |
98. Why not reach towards the exit wound? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:23 AM Response to Reply #98 |
158. 1963 didn't have a million camera-phones, okay? Zapruder was not seen as a FILM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #89 |
127. Wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:25 AM Response to Reply #127 |
159. No, JFK wasn't "sitting higher". And yes, I know the bullet had a downward trajectory (assuming it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 04:21 AM Response to Reply #159 |
163. Try this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:19 AM Response to Reply #159 |
173. You could not be more wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
79. I totally believe it because Poopy told all the.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
83. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
96. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
101. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
109. I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raejeanowl
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
114. No, But It's Moot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 06:03 PM Response to Reply #114 |
132. It isn't unknowable and it sure as hell isn't moot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raejeanowl
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 08:49 PM Response to Reply #132 |
139. I Respectfully Disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #139 |
141. "Even 40 years later CIA briefings to stay secret" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raejeanowl
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:00 AM Response to Reply #141 |
142. And This Article Is Relevant How? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:24 AM Response to Reply #142 |
143. "a U.S. appeals court ruled" = court ordered secrecy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 07:36 AM Response to Reply #132 |
164. "...the original conspirators, who are anything but unknown." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 05:38 PM Response to Reply #164 |
171. Hint: it wasn't Fidel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mutineer
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
134. Don't know, don't care. I believe the country has bigger problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 04:07 AM Response to Reply #134 |
161. The country's "bigger problems" haven't really changed much in 40 years... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
135. The "magic bullet" theory is a strawman for what officials actually think what happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 08:12 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. O-ohhhh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhatrw
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:34 AM Response to Reply #135 |
145. Of course it has, Posner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 04:17 AM Response to Reply #145 |
162. You appear to have misspelled my name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #135 |
166. Definitively proven by a right wing magician with an unloaded gun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:43 AM Response to Reply #166 |
176. Try talking sense. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
138. Yah, sure. Why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Thu Sep-06-07 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
140. i've given up thinking about it- we'll never know for sure what the truth is or was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raejeanowl
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:41 AM Response to Reply #140 |
146. My Point Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhatrw
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
144. No. Magic bullet = magic cell phones = magic debris field. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
165. Back and to the left. Back and to the left. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Time for change
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
167. Specter WAS a co-conspirator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
169. As a longtime shooter and student of shooting and ballistics--yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ahpook
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 06:21 PM Response to Reply #169 |
180. I think whoever actually did the shooting is not extremely... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
178. No, I rate it right up there with Jack's magic beans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
179. I do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC