|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:49 PM Original message |
Hey DU: The Nuclear Mistake may be just a Mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well okay then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. No tinfoil necessary. This was an ongoing program. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. As nuclear mistakes go, this one isn't bad. No explosions! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
3. Well, that's no fun--killjoy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebenaube
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. hmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. According to this yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. That's Why They Were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:34 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. I believe the author of the article is vastly more knowledgeable than you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. So You Claim To Know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. I don't make cheap shots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Minimizing What Knowledge I Have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Read Post 13 and 15. Do they apply as well? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 05:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. I Was Not Implying That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Maybe they have a retirement method in mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. AND Might I Add |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. and surprisingly enough to decommission these very weapons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
6. what better way to get rid of them then to explode them over Iran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Six warheads with ten times the capacity of hiroshima? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. notice the tinfoil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onethatcares
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
7. isn't the carrying of the nukes over the homeland the problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Yep, and its likely that is where they will stay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
10. Hmmmm...... Nah, too simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
11. well, if there was ever an administration to give the benefit of the doubt to...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomInTib
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
16. Weren't those missiles 129B's? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:37 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I looked. Can you find a link? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomInTib
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Maybe I dreamed it. At my age, it's hard to tell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Waiting for the story? Chang? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 05:59 PM Response to Reply #16 |
37. Raytheon reports there is no such thing as a 'B' model |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomInTib
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:53 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Thanks. I don't know why I thought that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:58 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Maybe it is the old age thing? Shrug |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
23. hmmm, let's see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. I'm trying to figure out a realistic reason why they'd lie about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
25. I feel so much better already! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:51 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. Darned if you don't have a way with words and logic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onethatcares
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:54 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. I wuv you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FourScore
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #25 |
40. Bliss. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
29. the nukes were never supposed to be on that plane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never_get_over_it
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
33. Well the reason I don't think it is a mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. There are lots of reasons why something is leaked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Just like invading and occupying Iraq were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC