|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:51 PM Original message |
Woman Sues Judge for Banning Words (rape trial barred use of 'rape', 'sexual assault') |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WindRavenX
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. I still dont understand how this was even legal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
djg21
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Because . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think we've found our next Attorney General |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
3. Deleted sub-thread |
Clovis Sangrail
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
4. hmmm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. It sounds like a pretty blatant attempt to influence the outcome of the trial, doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. maybe... maybe not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. In a case like this one I could see banning the police and techs from using the word rape |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
8. Deleted message |
itsrobert
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. We need to drop it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Deleted message |
gaspee
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 07:37 AM Response to Reply #9 |
47. Oh please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissB
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. You should take your concerns up with the adminstrators of the site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Deleted message |
WindRavenX
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. because getting intoxicated IS NOT A CRIME. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. then why is that guy being accused of rape? He got drunk and had sex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WindRavenX
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. and if it's consensual, it's not a crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. her entire defense is that she was drunk, so it must have been rape |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WindRavenX
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. is that *exactly* what she has said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. she claims she was too drunk to give consent. But she obviously left the bar with him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WindRavenX
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. they're too different things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:54 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. it doesn't automatically mean it was rape. She was drunk and made a dumb decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WindRavenX
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. No it doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. point is, she was aware enough to make that decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WindRavenX
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:13 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. "this is a case of regrets the morning after" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:14 AM Response to Reply #30 |
45. a little more info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angstlessk
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #25 |
43. Exactly, if he murders her because she is drunk is that consent? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #18 |
50. Thank you for that stunning defense of date rape drugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fizzgig
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. you hit it perfectly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Deleted sub-thread |
Matariki
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. I agree with you, except on one point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Deleted message |
WindRavenX
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Of course he does. He may be stupid as a rock, but that doesnt mean you can legally rob him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. what if, while in a drunken stupor, he gives you $100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WindRavenX
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. thats not a crime, is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. it was within the metaphor of robbing. try to pay attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Why are you assuming that the situation isn't the way the man thought it was? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WindRavenX
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. I'm not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikia
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #28 |
49. I don't know the history of there being cases like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:03 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. No of course not. What if he was drunk and gave his money away? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. I think the idea of personal responsibility is a hot topic here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
33. Deleted message |
MissB
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Glad to hear you're done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WindRavenX
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. it's predatory--no matter what gender. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katherine Brengle
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:46 AM Response to Reply #33 |
48. "Supposed feminists" means exactly what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
36. i know judge cheuvront, how strange is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissB
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Very strange. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. only judge i know in this country too. so weird |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Left Is Write
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
44. WTF? So how the HELL do you have a trial on charges of sexual assault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 02:34 AM Response to Original message |
46. Was there a motion in limine hearing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bariztr
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
51. Repost from othe thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 11:49 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. What words should be used in the place of rape? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 04:13 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC