|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:09 PM Original message |
" Republicans Forget to Run Presidential Candidate for 2008 " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. What's even more amazin than that . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. In the 1976 primary campaign, Carter didn't belabor his audiences in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. that`s what struck me about the republicans too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. I wonder if he would have gotten any support by his party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. not a chance in hell...he`s way to liberal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:38 PM Original message |
They are in a position where they are having to consider electability |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
3. No REAL Candidate because the Party is made of Deluded Peeps sucking for a deluded Philosophy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. the Repblican candidates are all "busy work", meant to keep us busy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
6. Bush wasn't electable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Well, he wasn't elected either. He cheated a good man. He paid Jim Baker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Ya think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Agree that we have to be vigilant, but my hunch is, now that BushCo has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. (some people never change) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prisoner_Number_Six
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
11. Four words: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Your avatar represents the last good Republican. Well, scratch that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:14 AM Response to Reply #11 |
65. either that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kazak
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
12. They love yahoo philistines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:56 PM Original message |
LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
losthills
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
14. Hilary nor Obama are going to be president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Well, we disagree. I think the demographics simply are not there this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Betty
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
15. maybe the repugs know it's going to be impossible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
18. who else do they have? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Agree. And a very solid point on Kindasleazy. The earlier talk about her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
19. GREAT post, my friend! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:28 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Nance! A warm howdy! Thanks for throwing in on this thread, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
54. And good to see you as well, my friend! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
21. Deleted message |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Poor form, laddie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:33 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. I refer to those two individuals as Senator Clinton and Senator Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:37 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. Deleted message |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I think some of us kinda like our chances. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aristus
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. What do you want on your tombstone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:11 AM Response to Reply #32 |
67. Okay ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:44 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Why do you even bother? Are there no reruns of "Get Smart" on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aristus
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:44 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. "Get Smart"? The repukes don't know how. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:48 PM Response to Reply #38 |
46. Maybe they should run him! He's apparently willing to take on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:05 AM Response to Reply #38 |
61. would you belieeeeve... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aristus
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:33 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Ooh, that's ugly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:35 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Aristus, thank you. I alerted also. By morning we should be done with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aristus
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I got your back, buddy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:42 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. as did I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. frogcycle, thank you. Much obliged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. I hope your short stay was enjoyable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #21 |
39. You waited three years to post that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aristus
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:46 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. He had to work out the spelling first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:49 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. LOL!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:48 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Fuck! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:48 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Bridezillas always do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Bastard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:55 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Yep, I replied to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:01 AM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Whoops, didn't see it until now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:05 AM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Ok. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 06:43 AM Response to Reply #45 |
72. Don't fret . . . I'm usually 50/50 on the soon-to-be-buried. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swede
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
43. Ding dong. Pizza's here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
33. There is a dispirited quality to their campaigns this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:44 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. LOL!! sfexpat2000, I needed a strong hit of your brains and heart, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:46 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Well, thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:22 AM Response to Reply #33 |
68. Brilliant! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 08:21 AM Response to Reply #33 |
74. Come on! Everyone is pumped up! It's like ... like ... BOB DOLE is running again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
42. I don't recall ever a one! Well one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:55 PM Response to Reply #42 |
52. Hey there, lonestarnot. If you're still up and typing, the world's better off for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:02 AM Response to Reply #52 |
58. Yes he would be the ONE and only! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:05 AM Response to Reply #58 |
62. A strong hug right back, lonestarnot. All's well, I think. I'm stunned by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:25 AM Response to Reply #62 |
66. What a lovely hope for me! Thank you. I likewise hope that you autumn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:03 AM Response to Reply #42 |
59. hmmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:08 AM Response to Reply #59 |
63. Especially compared to the modern-day Republicans, and I'm negligent for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
44. Good one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aristus
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
49. HERE LIES A DISRUPTOR. HE DISRUPTED POORLY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
51. To the Mods: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aristus
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:00 AM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Yes, indeed! Hats off to the Mods! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:02 AM Response to Reply #51 |
57. yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
64. yeah...forgot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:33 AM Response to Original message |
69. Thompson is the perfect candidate for a party of philistine yahoos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indenturedebtor
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:04 AM Response to Original message |
70. Gah I missed the fireworks show :( |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 04:03 AM Response to Original message |
71. One thing is for certain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 06:45 AM Response to Original message |
73. The list of candidates they are offering now are no different then the one they ran in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Sep-14-07 05:26 AM Response to Original message |
75. The answer to their problem is obvious. Run Stephen Colbert. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda
![]() |
Fri Sep-14-07 05:38 AM Response to Reply #75 |
76. If only they would.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 04:01 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC