|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Cyrano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 01:47 PM Original message |
Should all Republican gays be "outed?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. Although I'm generally against outing in private life, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. For me, it's a no-brainer: yes, they should be outed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. I wish they could be 'outed'... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. If they vote with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yes Yes Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
6. hard for me to answer that as I think there should be no reason for the closet in the first place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lateo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
7. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. If they oppose rights for gays, and they are themselves gay, that should be public info. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
9. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. That reminds me of the old public information campaign against drunk drivers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Using someone sexuality against them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Did you even read my post? I specifically stated that humiliation is not my goal at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Yes, I did read it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. I guess you're right. I really don't care if lying hypocritical Republicans get humiliated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
10. No, not "all." Only the ones who, by their words and votes in Congress, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
11. Ayup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunkerbuster1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
13. Yes. they give you an opening, you take it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
15. so you would go beyond those in government and include private citizens as well? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. It's only slippery *theoretically*, not practically. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cyrano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Perhaps I wasn't specific enough. I was referring to elected Republicans and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'm ok with it, but I understand why people would also be against it..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
18. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
19. What gays? We have no such phenomenon in this country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
20. No. That would make us no better than the freepers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cyrano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. The almost total corruption of the Republican Party is so incredibly obvious that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I think that eventually they will be outted by their own actions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
27. "Outed"? no. "Ousted", yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cyrano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. IMO, the majority of Americans already know about the Republican tie-ins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
28. If they oppose gay-rights and support a virulent anti-gay policy then I say YES. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insleeforprez (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
29. Not all Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
31. If they vote against rights for gay people ---> yes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pyrzqxgl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
32. It matters a lot if they are vocal gay bashers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-24-07 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
33. YES...any "family values, holier-than-though, anti-gay" HYPOCRITE should be outed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC