|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:32 AM Original message |
I'd like to hear a defense of the Clinton's successfully spiking the GQ story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
1. I want to know what's in the story. If it's so damn bad that she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #1 |
53. I hope it drives all the haters insane. I would really love that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:33 AM Response to Reply #53 |
57. I'm sure you wouldn't want to hear anything bad about your candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. So knowing that Obama's kids don't want to jump in bed with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:45 AM Response to Reply #59 |
60. I know how to discount the trivial and heed the important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #57 |
65. a bit of lucid thinking eh? Can't have that now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner
ADMIN ![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. She's running for president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zandor
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Smart politics at that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:39 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. What worries me about that is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zandor
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:44 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. And used by many Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:39 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. But is this not the very essence of media control and manipulation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. The Clintons are no better than the Bushies in this regard--WAYYYY too much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Please don't turn this into a Hillary bashing thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:51 AM Response to Reply #17 |
28. Not bashing--just referring to the fact that it's their obvious power over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. GQ is a fashion magazine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:41 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. i am glad someone aside from me said it. politicians are not angels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:43 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. ah, the everybody does it defense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #12 |
29. sorry if reality is not a good enough defense for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:56 AM Response to Reply #2 |
36. Right, if someone were going to print something unflattering to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
3. more power to her--- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:39 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. That's an interesting one, let me ponder on that for a while. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
8. You want to read about disagreements of people in a fashion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
35. GQ Is More Than That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #8 |
54. GQ has some really great investigative and political reporting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
10. ...and a follow-up question.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. It was about infighting among her campaign staff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:49 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Well of course it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:47 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. The Whole Article Was About Campaign Infighting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:08 AM Response to Reply #10 |
44. And you care about the crumbling, disorganized,repukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
13. Any candidate would try to kill any unflattering story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. They might try to kill it, but they shouldn't succeed. That is GQ's fault. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. More like Conde Nast's fault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:47 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. So the difference between this episode of media manipulation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #20 |
31. If you can't see the difference ....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:54 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Sweetie, I didn't ask for your help nor do I need it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 01:31 PM Response to Reply #34 |
64. Oh stop being so silly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cobalt1999
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
19. If you are running for president, you first of all have to control your image |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. NO IT WAS NOT DEAN'S FAILURE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cobalt1999
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:53 AM Response to Reply #23 |
32. Disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #32 |
62. Substance over image anyday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cobalt1999
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. Like it or not, to be elected you better have a good image. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Kill your TV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
24. It Was GQ That Made the Decision to Spike the Story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
26. Lemme ask a hypothetical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. You are within your rights to make this a non-issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:26 AM Response to Reply #30 |
55. I hope the small petty crap makes the small and petty lose their little minds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #30 |
63. First off ..... she's very far from my choice to be our nominee ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:01 AM Response to Reply #26 |
39. Do we like articles that make Rudy look bad? Do we appreciate getting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:16 AM Response to Reply #39 |
51. GQ Wouldn't Put Rudy On The Cover Of A Fashion Magazine Because He's Fugly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
27. I don't think the Clintons need a defense on this issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:53 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. An unflattering portrayal is "bashing"? What if it's the truth? Is the truth "bashing"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:58 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Anything... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Anything written about Hillary by Josh Green can be considered bashing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. So I should discount anything he has to say because YOU think he's biased? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:12 AM Response to Reply #43 |
48. That's your choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Do you honestly believe that Josh Green is not out to bash Hillary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:03 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. I don't know him, don't care who he is. If he has valid information, I want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. GQ didn't have to put Clinton on the cover. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Then Boycott GQ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:15 AM Response to Reply #46 |
50. I do blame GQ. They shouldn't bow to pressure--they are obviously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
41. I'd do it too, if I could. It's GQ, not the League of Women Voters, fer cryin' out loud. -eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #41 |
47. It's GQ, not the League of Women Voters, fer cryin' out loud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:17 AM Response to Reply #47 |
52. I've seen my candidates made into cartoons by fluff media. I support ANY Dem's ability to quash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:29 AM Response to Reply #52 |
56. I care about "personality profiles"--BIG TIME. Look at Rudy G.--we now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Rudy easily exposes himself by his public policy actions, and yes I've enjoyed anti-Rudy articles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
49. It happens all the time in publishing, and is much ado about nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
58. I think this story and the Hsu fundraising will both bite her in the ass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC