|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
bigtree
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:14 AM Original message |
MSNBC to bend to the Left? "Tucker is in real danger of being canceled"- Rosie considered for a slot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
1. ask MSNBC to hire Rachel Maddow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Serial Mom
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #1 |
40. I was thinking this when I read thread title.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
2. I love that freeper thread where they say "no one watches KO anyway." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
33. fauxnoise viewers are the least informed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
3. i love Rosie, but i don't want Dan Abrams to go away b/c of her... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #3 |
35. Dan Abrams practically owns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:06 PM Response to Reply #35 |
50. it seems that way, you're right. he was hilarious telling Buchanan he was acting insane last night. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rockholm
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:26 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Smack down of Buchanan was priceless last night! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #55 |
68. she was the bright spot in the dark, dark 2000 recount crusterfluck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rockholm
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 09:28 PM Response to Reply #68 |
75. I was flipping channels today and saw her on Court TV. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 02:22 PM Response to Reply #50 |
63. There ya go..maybe she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 05:35 PM Response to Reply #63 |
69. i'd love to see her and Abrams do a show together. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 06:04 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Send ol' Dan a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #35 |
64. I've always loved Dan Abrams. Bit of a law geek :) but a fun guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 05:32 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. i LOVE me some law geeks!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #67 |
73. Me too. I honestly had a schoolgirl crush on John Dean back in the day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rockholm
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 09:29 PM Response to Reply #67 |
76. I think he's rather HOT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
4. YAY! Dump bowtie boy! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace frog
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:51 AM Response to Reply #4 |
20. Haw haw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:06 AM Response to Reply #4 |
22. Faux has always been Tucker's destiny anyway.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
5. Blecch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I think Rosie could develop takes on 'actual news' which would have merit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oceansaway
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
7. TOUCHE !!.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
8. I'd like to see David Shuster get his own show (and use bloggers as guests!) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #8 |
36. YES!! David Shuster is very shrewd interviewer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
45. Yes and no on that. He's brilliant and tough, but he's also hungry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AspenRose
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
9. Bringing Donahue back on might not be a bad idea either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alphafemale
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:29 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Seconded nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusEarl
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:45 AM Response to Reply #9 |
17. I second Donahue, i would watch his show! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
10. I would not want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
74. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightZone
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
11. I sometimes think that Tucker's entire audience is on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:27 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I wait to see if Shuster is sitting in; if it's Tucker, I turn. And I agree, he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #11 |
46. I've considered that too. Same with Rush--if those who report Rush's latest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
57. Same with Fox Noise -- It's easy for me not to watch it at all; I could care less what they say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flarney
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
14. With as much crap as Tucker has talked about Rosie, how hilarious would it be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JitterbugPerfume
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
15. Rachel Maddow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:41 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. She would be a much smarter choice. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sallyseven
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #15 |
28. I love Rachel Maddow. I also like Allison Stewart.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
58. I love Rosie, but Rachel is sharp as a tack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
18. Here's someone who REALLY hearts Rosie...(pic) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
19. WTF...Fucker is in dangered of being cancelled? Fucker should'have been cancelled already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KiraBS
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
21. I am sure he will get a job and a pundit on Fox |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
23. That's ok his new show is already in production... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #23 |
37. "Cause of who is father is".. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberalynn
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
24. Way to GO MSNBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kermitt Gribble
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
25. I'd love to see Tucker get the boot!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
26. Please MSNBC, not Rosie! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 06:37 PM Response to Reply #26 |
72. With Rosie they "win" twice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
27. I love Rosie but she would be a disaster. She isn't informed enough and has a hard time expressing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I'd love to see Rachael Maddow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #29 |
38. Not only persuasive, she's articulate, incredibly informed and Brilliant. She really does have it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maine_raptor
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. THAT'S IT, What a brilliant idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. I've seen her take Buchanan on and it is a thing of beauty! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:10 PM Response to Reply #42 |
52. Did you see her and Buchanan last night on the Dan Abrams program? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #42 |
59. Yep, she is terrific |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
30. Lest there be no doubt..tucker is sympathetic to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
31. imo Tucker's show will be canceled because it just sucks, if he was a democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madamesilverspurs
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
32. "Perspective" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
34. Bring out the tiny violins!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maine_raptor
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
39. Tucker has been on the outs for a while now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VenusRising
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
41. The only issue I take with this article is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. you are so right! -- bashing not necessary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
44. Tucker's time has come... welcome to the trash heap of Repub Apologists Pundits! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
47. Maybe team up Rosie with Linda Ellerbee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
90-percent
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:05 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Ellerbee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
53. Someone please tell Scarborough that MSNBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark414
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
54. less blowhards and more journalists please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mad_Dem_X
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
56. I could take or leave Rosie, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blayne
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
60. Finally! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lugnut
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
61. Rachel Maddow needs a show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
62. Why Rosie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
65. How on earth the little rich shit-for-talent, Tucker survives disgraces NBC and MSNBC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boxerfan
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
66. To bad KommieCast has ISOLATED MSNBC to the upper tier PPV area... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 06:30 PM Response to Reply #66 |
71. Not universally true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC